delocalise

简明释义

英[ˌdiːˈloʊkəlaɪz]美[ˌdiːˈloʊkəlaɪz]

v. 使…….离开原位；使……不受位置限制（等于 delocalize）

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e l o c a l i s e s

现 在 分 词 d e l o c a l i s i n g

过 去 式 d e l o c a l i s e d

过 去 分 词 d e l o c a l i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The trend to delocalise jobs has led to significant economic changes.

工作去本地化的趋势导致了重大的经济变化。

2.Many businesses are looking to delocalise their operations to tap into new markets.

许多企业希望去本地化他们的运营，以进入新市场。

3.The company decided to delocalise its manufacturing to reduce costs.

公司决定去本地化其生产以降低成本。

4.To stay competitive, firms may need to delocalise some of their services.

为了保持竞争力，公司可能需要去本地化一些服务。

5.In an effort to improve efficiency, the team will delocalise certain processes.

为了提高效率，团队将去本地化某些流程。

作文

In today's globalized world, many companies are choosing to delocalise their operations. This means that they move their production facilities from one country to another, often in search of lower labor costs and more favorable economic conditions. The trend to delocalise has significant implications for both the economies of the countries involved and the workers who are affected by these decisions.One of the primary reasons companies opt to delocalise is to reduce operating costs. For instance, a manufacturer based in a developed country may find that labor costs are significantly lower in a developing country. By moving production overseas, the company can save money on wages, which can then be reinvested into other areas of the business or passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices. However, this practice can lead to job losses in the original country, creating economic challenges for local communities.Moreover, delocalisation can also impact the quality of products. Some critics argue that moving production to countries with less stringent regulations can lead to inferior quality control. Companies may prioritize cost savings over maintaining high standards, which can ultimately affect consumer trust and brand reputation.Another aspect of delocalisation is its effect on the workforce. Employees in the home country may face layoffs as jobs are moved abroad. This not only affects individuals but can also have a ripple effect on the local economy, leading to decreased spending and increased unemployment rates. Conversely, in the host country where the production is relocated, new job opportunities may arise, potentially improving the economic situation there. However, these jobs may not always provide the same level of stability or benefits as those that were lost.In addition to economic factors, delocalisation can also raise ethical questions. Companies must navigate the balance between profit maximization and social responsibility. Consumers are becoming increasingly aware of where and how products are made, leading to a demand for transparency in supply chains. Brands that are perceived as exploiting cheap labor in developing countries may face backlash from consumers who prefer to support ethical businesses.Furthermore, the environmental impact of delocalisation cannot be overlooked. Moving production to countries with looser environmental regulations can lead to increased pollution and resource depletion. As companies seek to reduce costs, they may inadvertently contribute to environmental degradation, prompting calls for more sustainable practices in manufacturing.In conclusion, while delocalisation presents opportunities for cost savings and market expansion, it also poses significant challenges and ethical dilemmas. Companies must carefully consider the implications of relocating their operations, not only for their bottom line but also for the communities they leave behind and the environments they impact. As globalization continues to shape the business landscape, understanding the complexities of delocalisation will be essential for both businesses and consumers alike, fostering a more informed approach to global trade and production practices.

在当今全球化的世界中，许多公司选择去地方化他们的运营。这意味着他们将生产设施从一个国家转移到另一个国家，通常是为了寻找更低的劳动力成本和更有利的经济条件。去地方化的趋势对涉及国家的经济以及受这些决策影响的工人有重大影响。公司选择去地方化的主要原因之一是降低运营成本。例如，一家总部位于发达国家的制造商可能会发现，发展中国家的劳动力成本显著较低。通过将生产迁往海外，公司可以节省工资支出，这些资金可以重新投资于业务的其他领域，或以更低的价格传递给消费者。然而，这种做法可能导致原国家的失业，使当地社区面临经济挑战。此外，去地方化也可能影响产品质量。一些批评者认为，将生产转移到监管不那么严格的国家可能导致质量控制不佳。公司可能会优先考虑节省成本而不是保持高标准，这最终会影响消费者信任和品牌声誉。去地方化的另一个方面是对劳动力的影响。母国的员工可能会因工作转移而面临裁员。这不仅影响个人，还可能对当地经济产生连锁反应，导致消费减少和失业率上升。相反，在生产迁移的东道国，可能会出现新的就业机会，改善当地的经济状况。然而，这些工作可能并不总能提供与失去的工作相同的稳定性或福利。除了经济因素，去地方化还引发了伦理问题。公司必须在利润最大化和社会责任之间找到平衡。消费者越来越关注产品的生产地点和方式，导致对供应链透明度的需求。那些被认为在发展中国家剥削廉价劳动力的品牌可能会面临来自消费者的抵制，因为他们更愿意支持道德企业。此外，去地方化的环境影响也不容忽视。将生产迁移到环境法规较松的国家可能导致污染和资源枯竭的增加。随着公司寻求降低成本，他们可能无意中导致环境退化，从而促使人们呼吁在制造中采取更可持续的做法。总之，虽然去地方化为节省成本和市场扩展提供了机会，但它也带来了重大挑战和伦理困境。公司必须仔细考虑迁移运营的影响，不仅要考虑自身的利润，还要考虑他们所离开的社区和所影响的环境。随着全球化继续塑造商业格局，理解去地方化的复杂性对于企业和消费者来说都将至关重要，从而促进对全球贸易和生产实践的更明智的看法。