anthropophagy
简明释义
英[ˈænθrəpɒfədʒi]美[ˌænθrəˈpɑːfədʒi;ˌænθroʊˈpɑːf
n. 食人
英英释义
Anthropophagy refers to the practice of eating human flesh; cannibalism. | 人食指的是吃人肉的行为;即食人肉或食人族。 |
单词用法
文学中的人食现象 | |
人食的实践 | |
文化人食现象 | |
仪式性人食 |
同义词
反义词
人食人 | 人食人在恐怖电影中经常被描绘。 | ||
人道主义 | 人道主义旨在减轻人类的痛苦。 |
例句
1.Another, less popular term is anthropophagy , Greek for ‘the eating of humans’.
关于“食人”的另一较少用的词汇是希腊语的“anthropophagy”,意思是“吃人的行为”。
2.Another, less popular term is anthropophagy , Greek for ‘the eating of humans’.
关于“食人”的另一较少用的词汇是希腊语的“anthropophagy”,意思是“吃人的行为”。
3.In literature, anthropophagy (人食) is often used to symbolize extreme survival instincts.
在文学中,人食常常用来象征极端的生存本能。
4.Some researchers argue that anthropophagy (人食) was a survival tactic during prehistoric times.
一些研究人员认为,在史前时期,人食是一种生存策略。
5.The documentary explored the history of anthropophagy (人食) in different cultures around the world.
这部纪录片探讨了世界各地不同文化中人食的历史。
6.The horror film depicted anthropophagy (人食) in a chilling and graphic manner.
这部恐怖电影以令人毛骨悚然和生动的方式描绘了人食。
7.The ancient tribe practiced anthropophagy (人食) as part of their rituals.
这个古老的部落在他们的仪式中实践了人食。
作文
Throughout history, the concept of anthropophagy has sparked both fascination and horror. The term refers to the practice of eating human flesh, often associated with various cultural rituals, survival situations, or criminal acts. While most societies today view anthropophagy as taboo, there are instances in history where it was practiced for reasons ranging from survival to religious beliefs. In ancient cultures, some tribes engaged in anthropophagy as a means of honoring their deceased or to absorb their strength and wisdom. Such practices were often deeply rooted in the spiritual beliefs of these communities.In literature and folklore, anthropophagy has frequently been used as a motif to explore themes of civilization versus savagery. For instance, in William Golding's "Lord of the Flies," the descent into chaos among a group of boys stranded on an island reflects the primal instincts that lie beneath the veneer of civilized society. The idea that humans could resort to anthropophagy serves as a chilling reminder of the thin line that separates order from chaos.Moreover, anthropophagy has also been depicted in modern media, often sensationalized to evoke shock and horror. Films and books that feature cannibalism tend to focus on the psychological aspects of the characters involved, delving into what drives a person to commit such acts. This portrayal raises questions about morality, ethics, and the nature of humanity itself. Are those who engage in anthropophagy merely products of their environment, or do they possess an inherent darkness within them?In contemporary discussions, anthropophagy is often linked to issues of mental health and societal breakdown. Cases of cannibalism in modern times are typically associated with severe psychological disorders, leading to debates about the responsibilities of society in preventing such tragedies. The stigma surrounding anthropophagy can also complicate the understanding of these cases, as they often lead to sensationalist media coverage that overlooks the underlying issues.Furthermore, the ethical implications of anthropophagy extend to discussions about body autonomy and consent. In extreme scenarios, such as consensual cannibalism, where individuals agree to partake in the act, the moral landscape becomes murky. These discussions challenge our perceptions of ownership over one’s body and the limits of personal freedom.Overall, anthropophagy remains a complex and multifaceted topic that encompasses historical, cultural, psychological, and ethical dimensions. By examining this practice through various lenses, we gain insights into the darker aspects of human nature and the societal factors that can lead individuals to such extremes. As we continue to grapple with these themes, it is crucial to approach the subject with sensitivity and an understanding of the broader context in which anthropophagy exists. Only then can we hope to comprehend the myriad reasons behind this unsettling aspect of humanity, while acknowledging the profound implications it holds for our understanding of civilization itself.
在历史上,人肉食的概念引发了人们的迷恋与恐惧。这个术语指的是吃人肉的行为,通常与各种文化仪式、生存情境或犯罪行为相关联。虽然今天大多数社会将人肉食视为禁忌,但历史上确实存在一些出于生存或宗教信仰等原因而进行的实例。在古代文化中,一些部落进行人肉食是为了纪念死者,或者吸收他们的力量和智慧。这种做法往往深深植根于这些社区的精神信仰之中。在文学和民间故事中,人肉食常常被用作探索文明与野蛮主题的动机。例如,在威廉·戈尔丁的《蝇王》中,一群男孩在岛上迷失后逐渐陷入混乱,反映了文明社会表面下潜藏的原始本能。人类可能会诉诸于人肉食的想法,是对秩序与混乱之间微薄界限的可怕提醒。此外,人肉食在现代媒体中也经常被描绘,通常被夸大以引发震惊和恐惧。涉及食人行为的电影和书籍往往关注角色的心理方面,深入探讨是什么驱使一个人去做出这样的行为。这种描绘引发了关于道德、伦理和人性本质的问题。那些参与人肉食的人只是环境的产物,还是他们内心深处有一种固有的黑暗?在当代讨论中,人肉食通常与心理健康和社会崩溃问题相关联。现代社会中的食人案件通常与严重的心理障碍有关,导致关于社会在预防此类悲剧中的责任的辩论。围绕人肉食的污名化也可能使理解这些案例变得复杂,因为这些案例通常会引发耸人听闻的媒体报道,而忽视了潜在的问题。此外,人肉食的伦理含义还延伸到身体自主权和同意的讨论。在极端情况下,例如自愿食人,其中个人同意参与这一行为,道德领域变得模糊。这些讨论挑战了我们对身体所有权的看法以及个人自由的界限。总体而言,人肉食仍然是一个复杂而多面的主题,涵盖了历史、文化、心理和伦理维度。通过不同的视角审视这一实践,我们可以洞察人性阴暗面的深层次因素,以及导致个体走向极端的社会因素。当我们继续努力应对这些主题时,重要的是以敏感性和对人肉食存在的更广泛背景的理解来接近这一主题。只有这样,我们才能希望理解这一令人不安的人性方面背后的多种原因,同时承认它对我们对文明本身的理解所具有的深远影响。