boycott

简明释义

英[ˈbɔɪkɒt]美[ˈbɔɪkɑːt]

v. 抵制，拒绝参加

n. 抵制行动

【名】 （Boycott）博伊科特（人名）

复 数 b o y c o t t s

第 三 人 称 单 数 b o y c o t t s

现 在 分 词 b o y c o t t i n g

过 去 式 b o y c o t t e d

过 去 分 词 b o y c o t t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Thousands of netizens have said they will join the boycott.

成千上万的网民表示他们将加入抵制活动。

2.There were even sporadic calls to boycott Confucius.

到现在仍有一些人呼吁抵制《孔子》。

3.Some called for a boycott of French goods.

一些人呼吁抵制法国货。

4.Some people even said they would boycott the airline.

有些人甚至说他们要抵制这家航空公司。

5.Some boring people tried to boycott his action.

一些讨厌的人试图联合抵制他的行为。

6.T. H. Breen argued that the consumer boycott was a brilliantly original American invention.

T.H.Breen认为，消费者抵制运动是美国的一项杰出发明。

7.If that happens, passionate consumers would try to persuade others to boycott products, putting the reputation of the target company at risk.

如果发生这种情况，激情澎湃的消费者会试图说服其他人共同抵制产品，从而使目标公司的声誉面临风险。

8.In response to the company's labor practices, activists called for a boycott of its products.

为了响应该公司的劳动实践，活动人士呼吁对其产品进行抵制。

9.Many fans chose to boycott the concert after the artist made controversial statements.

许多粉丝选择对这场音乐会进行抵制，因为艺术家发表了有争议的言论。

10.To protest against animal testing, the organization urged people to boycott brands that use such practices.

为了抗议动物实验，该组织呼吁人们对使用这种做法的品牌进行抵制。

11.The students organized a boycott of the cafeteria due to unsatisfactory food quality.

由于餐厅食物质量不佳，学生们组织了一次抵制。

12.The community decided to boycott the local store after it raised its prices unfairly.

社区决定对这家当地商店进行抵制，因为它不公平地提高了价格。

作文

The concept of a boycott has been a powerful tool for social change throughout history. A boycott is the act of abstaining from using, buying, or dealing with a person, organization, or country as a form of protest. This method has been used by various groups to express their dissatisfaction and to push for change in policies or practices they find unjust. For example, during the American Civil Rights Movement, activists organized a boycott of segregated bus services in Montgomery, Alabama. This boycott lasted for over a year and ultimately led to a Supreme Court ruling that declared segregation on public buses unconstitutional.The effectiveness of a boycott lies in its ability to draw attention to a cause and to apply economic pressure on the targeted entity. When consumers withdraw their support, it can lead to significant financial losses for businesses or governments, compelling them to reconsider their actions. A modern example of this is the boycott of companies that do not adhere to ethical labor practices. Consumers are becoming increasingly aware of where their products come from and the conditions under which they are made. By choosing not to purchase goods from companies that exploit workers, they are effectively using a boycott to advocate for better treatment of employees worldwide.However, boycotts can also be controversial. Critics argue that they may harm innocent parties, such as employees of a company who are not responsible for the decisions made by management. Additionally, some believe that boycotts can polarize communities and create further divisions rather than fostering dialogue and understanding. It is essential for those considering a boycott to weigh the potential consequences carefully and to ensure that their actions align with their values and goals.In recent years, social media has transformed the landscape of boycotts. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow for rapid dissemination of information and mobilization of support. Hashtags such as #BoycottXYZ can quickly gain traction, leading to widespread awareness and participation. This digital age has made it easier for individuals to join forces and amplify their voices, making boycotts more effective than ever before.Ultimately, a boycott is more than just a refusal to buy; it is a statement of values and a call to action. It reflects the collective power of individuals to influence change and hold corporations and governments accountable. While there are challenges and criticisms associated with boycotts, their historical significance and ability to effect change cannot be overlooked. As society continues to evolve, so too will the methods of protest, but the core principle of a boycott remains the same: standing up for what is right and demanding justice through collective action.

抵制的概念在历史上一直是社会变革的强大工具。抵制是指以抗议的形式，拒绝使用、购买或与某个人、组织或国家打交道的行为。这种方法被各种群体用来表达不满，并推动他们认为不公正的政策或做法的改变。例如，在美国民权运动期间，活动家组织了对阿拉巴马州蒙哥马利市种族隔离公交服务的抵制。这场抵制持续了超过一年，最终导致最高法院裁定公共汽车上的种族隔离违宪。抵制的有效性在于其能够引起对某一原因的关注，并对目标实体施加经济压力。当消费者撤回支持时，这可能会给企业或政府带来重大经济损失，迫使他们重新考虑自己的行为。现代的一个例子是对不遵循伦理劳动实践的公司的抵制。消费者越来越意识到他们的产品来自何处以及它们是如何制造的。通过选择不购买那些剥削工人的公司的商品，他们实际上是在利用抵制来倡导全球员工的更好待遇。然而，抵制也可能是有争议的。批评者认为，它可能会伤害无辜的各方，例如那些对管理层决策不负责任的公司的员工。此外，一些人认为抵制可能会使社区极化，造成进一步的分裂，而不是促进对话和理解。考虑抵制的人必须仔细权衡潜在后果，并确保他们的行动与他们的价值观和目标一致。近年来，社交媒体改变了抵制的格局。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台允许信息迅速传播，动员支持。标签如#BoycottXYZ可以迅速获得关注，导致广泛的意识和参与。这种数字时代使个人更容易联合起来，放大他们的声音，使得抵制比以往任何时候都更有效。最终，抵制不仅仅是拒绝购买；它是价值观的声明和行动的呼吁。它反映了个人影响变革和追究企业及政府责任的集体力量。尽管抵制存在挑战和批评，但其历史意义和影响变革的能力不容忽视。随着社会的不断发展，抗议的方法也将不断演变，但抵制这一核心原则始终不变：为正确的事情站出来，通过集体行动要求正义。