mercs

简明释义

英[mɜːks]美[mɜrks]

n. 外国雇佣兵（merc 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.2: Episodes: Sean and Beverly are guests at an elegant dinner party at Mercs house, where Sean is flattered by a silver-tongued Matt.

第2集：情节：肖恩和贝弗利在他们的房子在一个优雅的宴会上的客人，而肖恩是让一个能说会道的马特。

2.The Mercs hail from a town in southern Germany called Affalterbach, where Mercedes’s AMG performance division is based.

奔驰车厂来自德国南方一个叫阿法尔特巴赫的小镇，它的AMG高性能分部也驻扎在那。

3.The Lance are the best-armed mercs out there. You need something better!

赤矛们有着最强力的装备，你也需要好好武装一下！

4.Dialogs with own mercs in foreign castles, just in case and for 3.6 games - should never happen with the new 3.61 fixes.

新对话：与自己的佣兵团在其他国家城堡的对话。这是针对3.6版本的存档。3.61版本不会发生该情况。

5.The Mercs hail from a town in southern Germany called Affalterbach.

奔驰车厂位于德国南方一个叫阿法尔特巴赫的小镇。

6.2: Episodes: Sean and Beverly are guests at an elegant dinner party at Mercs house, where Sean is flattered by a silver-tongued Matt.

第2集：情节：肖恩和贝弗利在他们的房子在一个优雅的宴会上的客人，而肖恩是让一个能说会道的马特。

7.The company hired a team of mercs to secure the area during the conflict.

公司雇佣了一支雇佣兵团队在冲突期间保障该地区的安全。

8.After the government collapsed, many mercs flooded into the country for profit.

政府崩溃后，许多雇佣兵涌入该国以谋取利益。

9.In the video game, players can recruit mercs to help them complete missions.

在这款视频游戏中，玩家可以招募雇佣兵来帮助他们完成任务。

10.They used mercs for their military operations instead of regular soldiers.

他们在军事行动中使用了雇佣兵而不是常规士兵。

11.The presence of mercs in the region raised concerns about human rights violations.

该地区出现雇佣兵引发了对人权侵犯的担忧。

作文

In today's world, the concept of private military contractors has gained significant attention. These individuals or groups, often referred to as mercs (雇佣兵), operate outside the traditional military framework. They provide various services, including security, logistics, and even combat support in conflict zones. The rise of mercs (雇佣兵) can be attributed to several factors, including the privatization of military services and the increasing complexity of modern warfare. One of the most notable examples of mercs (雇佣兵) in recent history is the involvement of companies like Blackwater during the Iraq War. These organizations were contracted by governments to carry out missions that were deemed too dangerous for regular military personnel. While they provided essential services, their actions also raised ethical questions about accountability and the rules of engagement. The use of mercs (雇佣兵) has sparked a heated debate regarding the implications of outsourcing military operations. On one hand, proponents argue that mercs (雇佣兵) offer flexibility and expertise that can enhance the effectiveness of military missions. They can be deployed quickly and are often more cost-effective than maintaining a standing army. Additionally, mercs (雇佣兵) can operate in environments where traditional forces may face restrictions or limitations. On the other hand, critics highlight the potential dangers associated with employing mercs (雇佣兵). The lack of oversight and regulation can lead to abuses of power and violations of human rights. Incidents involving mercs (雇佣兵) have sometimes resulted in civilian casualties, leading to public outrage and calls for stricter regulations. This raises important questions about who is responsible for the actions of these contractors and how they are held accountable. Furthermore, the presence of mercs (雇佣兵) can complicate diplomatic relations. When private contractors are involved in military operations, it blurs the lines between state and non-state actors. This can create challenges for international law, as mercs (雇佣兵) may not be subject to the same legal frameworks as regular soldiers. The lack of clarity regarding their status can lead to conflicts over jurisdiction and accountability. As we move forward, it is crucial to address the role of mercs (雇佣兵) in modern warfare. Establishing clear guidelines and regulations for their use can help mitigate some of the risks associated with their employment. This includes ensuring that mercs (雇佣兵) adhere to international humanitarian law and are held accountable for their actions. In conclusion, the phenomenon of mercs (雇佣兵) represents a complex and evolving aspect of contemporary conflict. While they can provide valuable services in challenging environments, the ethical and legal implications of their use cannot be overlooked. As societies grapple with the realities of modern warfare, it is essential to strike a balance between utilizing mercs (雇佣兵) effectively and ensuring that their presence does not undermine accountability and justice in conflict situations.

在当今世界，私人军事承包商的概念引起了人们的广泛关注。这些个人或团体，通常被称为mercs（雇佣兵），在传统军队框架之外运作。他们提供各种服务，包括安全、后勤，甚至在冲突地区的战斗支持。mercs（雇佣兵）的兴起可以归因于多个因素，包括军事服务的私有化和现代战争日益复杂化。最近历史上最著名的mercs（雇佣兵）例子之一是黑水公司在伊拉克战争中的参与。这些组织被政府雇佣来执行被认为对常规军人过于危险的任务。虽然他们提供了必要的服务，但他们的行为也引发了关于问责制和交战规则的伦理问题。使用mercs（雇佣兵）引发了关于外包军事行动影响的激烈辩论。一方面，支持者认为mercs（雇佣兵）提供的灵活性和专业知识可以增强军事任务的有效性。他们可以迅速部署，并且通常比维持常备军更具成本效益。此外，在传统部队可能面临限制或局限的环境中，mercs（雇佣兵）可以运作。另一方面，批评者强调雇佣mercs（雇佣兵）相关的潜在危险。缺乏监督和监管可能导致滥用权力和侵犯人权的行为。涉及mercs（雇佣兵）的事件有时会导致平民伤亡，引发公众愤怒并呼吁更严格的监管。这引发了关于这些承包商的行为由谁负责以及如何追究责任的重要问题。此外，mercs（雇佣兵）的存在可能会使外交关系复杂化。当私人承包商参与军事行动时，它模糊了国家与非国家行为者之间的界限。这可能给国际法带来挑战，因为mercs（雇佣兵）可能不受与常规士兵相同的法律框架的约束。关于他们地位的缺乏清晰度可能导致管辖权和问责制的冲突。展望未来，必须解决mercs（雇佣兵）在现代战争中的角色。建立明确的指导方针和使用规定可以帮助减轻与其雇佣相关的一些风险。这包括确保mercs（雇佣兵）遵守国际人道法，并对他们的行为承担责任。总之，mercs（雇佣兵）现象代表了当代冲突的复杂而不断发展的一个方面。虽然他们可以在具有挑战性的环境中提供有价值的服务，但他们使用的伦理和法律影响不容忽视。当社会应对现代战争的现实时，必须在有效利用mercs（雇佣兵）与确保他们的存在不会破坏冲突情况下的问责制和正义之间取得平衡。