sceptics
简明释义
n. 怀疑论者(sceptic 的复数);持怀疑态度的人
英英释义
People who doubt or question the validity or authenticity of something. | 怀疑或质疑某事的有效性或真实性的人。 |
单词用法
气候变化怀疑论者 | |
科学怀疑论者 | |
怀疑论者质疑 | |
怀疑论者争辩 |
同义词
怀疑者 | 许多怀疑者对提出的证据仍然不信服。 | ||
不信者 | 不信者认为证据不足。 | ||
质疑者 | 质疑者常常挑战既定信念。 | ||
批评者 | 该理论的批评者提出了几个有效的观点。 | ||
愤世嫉俗者 | 愤世嫉俗者往往将乐观的看法视为不切实际。 |
反义词
信徒 | Many believers in science advocate for climate change action. | 许多科学信徒倡导气候变化行动。 | |
支持者 | Supporters of the new policy argue it will benefit the community. | 新政策的支持者辩称这将使社区受益。 | |
倡导者 | 该项目的倡导者相信它将创造就业机会。 |
例句
1.What do sceptics think of Danielle Steel's work schedule claims?
持怀疑态度的人对丹尼尔·斯蒂尔的工作时间表声明有何看法?
2.The sceptics should not be silenced.
质疑者不应该被迫保持缄默。
3.But the sceptics might be right.
但怀疑者可能是对的。
4.But sceptics could point to counter-examples.
但持怀疑态度者也能举出反例。
5.Sceptics had warned that Texas would be last into the recession but last out.
怀疑论者曾警告德克萨斯州的经济已经持续衰退但是依然可以支撑。
6.Sceptics have plenty of ammunition.
怀疑者有大量的可以用来攻击的炮弹。
7.Many climate change sceptics 怀疑论者 argue that the data is exaggerated.
许多气候变化sceptics 怀疑论者认为数据被夸大了。
8.Despite the evidence, sceptics 怀疑论者 continue to question the effectiveness of renewable energy.
尽管有证据,sceptics 怀疑论者仍然质疑可再生能源的有效性。
9.Some financial sceptics 怀疑论者 believe that cryptocurrency is just a bubble waiting to burst.
一些金融sceptics 怀疑论者认为加密货币只是一个等待破裂的泡沫。
10.The new vaccine has been met with resistance from some sceptics 怀疑论者 in the community.
该新疫苗在社区中遭到了一些sceptics 怀疑论者的抵制。
11.The scientist presented her findings to a group of sceptics 怀疑论者 who remained unconvinced.
这位科学家向一群sceptics 怀疑论者展示了她的研究结果,但他们仍然没有信服。
作文
In today's rapidly changing world, the role of sceptics (怀疑者) has become increasingly significant. With the advent of new technologies and scientific discoveries, it is essential to question and critically analyze the information that we encounter daily. While some may view sceptics (怀疑者) as negative forces that hinder progress, they actually serve a vital purpose in ensuring that our beliefs and practices are based on sound evidence rather than mere speculation or popular opinion.For instance, consider the ongoing debates surrounding climate change. There are many sceptics (怀疑者) who challenge the prevailing narratives about human-induced global warming. They argue that the data supporting these claims may be flawed or misinterpreted. While some may dismiss these individuals as contrarians, their inquiries can lead to more rigorous scientific investigations. By questioning established norms, sceptics (怀疑者) push researchers to refine their methodologies and strengthen their arguments, ultimately benefiting the scientific community as a whole.Moreover, the rise of misinformation in the digital age highlights the importance of sceptics (怀疑者) in society. Social media platforms are rife with unverified claims and conspiracy theories. In such an environment, sceptics (怀疑者) play a crucial role in promoting critical thinking and discernment among the public. They encourage individuals to seek out credible sources, evaluate the evidence presented, and make informed decisions. This process is vital for fostering a well-informed citizenry capable of navigating complex issues.However, it is important to recognize that not all sceptics (怀疑者) are created equal. Some may hold onto their doubts due to personal biases or ideological beliefs rather than a commitment to truth. This type of scepticism (怀疑主义) can be detrimental, as it may lead to the rejection of well-established facts and hinder progress. Therefore, it is essential to distinguish between constructive scepticism (怀疑主义) and destructive doubt.In conclusion, while the presence of sceptics (怀疑者) in society can sometimes be uncomfortable, their contributions are invaluable. They challenge us to think critically, question assumptions, and seek evidence before forming conclusions. In a world where information is abundant yet often misleading, the voice of the sceptic (怀疑者) serves as a necessary counterbalance. Embracing healthy scepticism (怀疑主义) can lead to greater understanding and innovation, ultimately paving the way for a more informed and rational society.
在当今快速变化的世界中,sceptics(怀疑者)的角色变得越来越重要。随着新技术和科学发现的出现,质疑和批判性分析我们每天遇到的信息是至关重要的。虽然有些人可能将sceptics(怀疑者)视为阻碍进步的负面力量,但他们实际上在确保我们的信仰和实践建立在可靠证据而非单纯推测或流行观点的基础上发挥着重要作用。例如,考虑一下围绕气候变化的持续辩论。有许多sceptics(怀疑者)挑战关于人类引起全球变暖的主流叙事。他们认为支持这些主张的数据可能存在缺陷或被误解。虽然一些人可能会将这些个体视为反对者,但他们的质疑可以导致更严格的科学调查。通过质疑既定规范,sceptics(怀疑者)促使研究人员完善他们的方法并加强他们的论点,最终使整个科学界受益。此外,数字时代虚假信息的兴起凸显了sceptics(怀疑者)在社会中的重要性。社交媒体平台充斥着未经验证的主张和阴谋论。在这样的环境中,sceptics(怀疑者)在促进公众的批判性思维和辨别能力方面发挥着关键作用。他们鼓励个人寻找可信来源,评估所呈现的证据,并做出明智的决定。这一过程对于培养能够应对复杂问题的知识渊博的公民至关重要。然而,重要的是要认识到并非所有的sceptics(怀疑者)都是平等的。有些人可能由于个人偏见或意识形态信仰而坚持自己的怀疑,而不是对真相的承诺。这种类型的scepticism(怀疑主义)可能是有害的,因为它可能导致对已建立事实的拒绝并阻碍进步。因此,区分建设性的scepticism(怀疑主义)和破坏性的怀疑至关重要。总之,尽管社会中存在sceptics(怀疑者)的存在有时可能令人不安,但他们的贡献是无价的。他们挑战我们进行批判性思考,质疑假设,并在形成结论之前寻求证据。在信息丰富但常常具有误导性的世界中,sceptic(怀疑者)的声音作为必要的制衡。拥抱健康的scepticism(怀疑主义)可以导致更大的理解和创新,最终为一个更加知识渊博和理性的社会铺平道路。