nuclear superiority

简明释义

核优势

英英释义

Nuclear superiority refers to the condition in which a state possesses a greater quantity or more advanced nuclear weapons than its adversaries, allowing it to deter threats or achieve strategic objectives.

核优势指一个国家拥有比其对手更多或更先进的核武器,从而能够威慑威胁或实现战略目标的状态。

例句

1.The country's strategy is heavily based on achieving nuclear superiority 核优势 over its rivals.

该国的战略严重依赖于实现对其竞争对手的核优势 核优势

2.Achieving nuclear superiority 核优势 is often seen as a key factor in national security policies.

实现核优势 核优势通常被视为国家安全政策的关键因素。

3.During the Cold War, both superpowers sought nuclear superiority 核优势 to deter each other from launching an attack.

在冷战期间,两大超级大国都寻求核优势 核优势以阻止对方发动攻击。

4.Some analysts argue that nuclear superiority 核优势 leads to a more stable balance of power.

一些分析人士认为,核优势 核优势会导致更稳定的权力平衡。

5.The debate surrounding nuclear superiority 核优势 continues to be a contentious issue in international relations.

围绕核优势 核优势的辩论仍然是国际关系中的一个有争议的问题。

作文

The concept of nuclear superiority refers to the ability of one state to possess a greater number or more advanced nuclear weapons compared to another state. This notion has been a significant factor in international relations and military strategy since the advent of nuclear weapons. The pursuit of nuclear superiority can lead to an arms race, where nations continuously seek to outdo each other in terms of their nuclear capabilities. This competition often escalates tensions and can create a precarious balance of power, where the threat of nuclear conflict looms large.Historically, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a fierce competition for nuclear superiority during the Cold War. Both nations invested heavily in developing their nuclear arsenals, leading to the accumulation of thousands of warheads. This period was characterized by the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which posited that if both sides possessed enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other, neither would initiate a conflict. However, this delicate balance was maintained through the pursuit of nuclear superiority, as each side sought to ensure that they had the upper hand in any potential confrontation.In contemporary times, the issue of nuclear superiority remains relevant, particularly with the rise of new nuclear powers such as North Korea and the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan. These countries are also engaged in their own quests for nuclear superiority, which can destabilize regional security and provoke further conflicts. The proliferation of nuclear weapons complicates global efforts to maintain peace and security, as more states acquire these capabilities and seek to assert their dominance.Moreover, the concept of nuclear superiority raises ethical questions about the morality of possessing such destructive power. Critics argue that the existence of nuclear weapons poses an existential threat to humanity, and that efforts should be made to eliminate them altogether. In contrast, proponents of nuclear superiority contend that nuclear arsenals serve as a deterrent against aggression and can help maintain stability in an anarchic international system.Ultimately, the pursuit of nuclear superiority is a complex and contentious issue that requires careful consideration. While it may provide a sense of security for some states, it also contributes to global instability and the potential for catastrophic conflict. As nations navigate the challenges of the 21st century, the implications of nuclear superiority must be addressed through diplomatic dialogue, arms control agreements, and a commitment to non-proliferation. Only through cooperative efforts can the world hope to mitigate the risks associated with nuclear weapons and move towards a safer future.In conclusion, nuclear superiority is not merely a military concept; it embodies the intricate interplay of power, security, and ethics in international relations. As we reflect on the history and current state of nuclear arms, it is imperative to recognize the consequences of this pursuit and strive for a world where peace prevails over the threat of annihilation.

“核优势”这一概念指的是一个国家相较于另一个国家拥有更多或更先进的核武器的能力。自核武器问世以来,这一观念便成为国际关系和军事战略中的一个重要因素。追求核优势可能导致军备竞赛,各国不断寻求在核能力上超越对方。这种竞争往往加剧紧张局势,可能造成脆弱的权力平衡,核冲突的威胁时刻存在。历史上,美国和苏联在冷战期间为争夺核优势展开了激烈的竞争。两国在发展核武器方面投入巨资,导致积累了数千枚核弹头。这一时期以相互确保毁灭(MAD)学说为特征,该学说认为如果双方都拥有足够的核武器来摧毁对方,那么就不会发起冲突。然而,这种微妙的平衡是通过追求核优势来维持的,因为每一方都试图确保在任何潜在对抗中占据上风。在当代,核优势的问题依然相关,尤其是在朝鲜等新兴核大国崛起以及印度与巴基斯坦之间持续的紧张关系中。这些国家也在追求自己的核优势,这可能会破坏地区安全并引发进一步冲突。核武器的扩散使全球维持和平与安全的努力变得复杂,因为越来越多的国家获得这些能力并寻求主导地位。此外,核优势的概念还引发了关于拥有如此毁灭性力量的道德问题。批评者认为,核武器的存在对人类构成生存威胁,应该采取措施彻底消除它们。相反,支持核优势的人则认为,核武器作为对侵略的威慑,可以帮助在无政府国际体系中维持稳定。最终,追求核优势是一个复杂而有争议的问题,需要谨慎考虑。虽然这可能为某些国家提供安全感,但也会导致全球不稳定和潜在的灾难性冲突。随着各国应对21世纪的挑战,必须通过外交对话、军控协议和对不扩散的承诺来解决核优势的影响。只有通过合作努力,世界才能希望减轻与核武器相关的风险,迈向一个更安全的未来。总之,核优势不仅仅是一个军事概念;它体现了国际关系中权力、安全和伦理的复杂交织。当我们反思核武器的历史和现状时,必须认识到追求这一目标的后果,并努力创造一个和平胜过毁灭威胁的世界。

相关单词

nuclear

nuclear详解:怎么读、什么意思、用法

superiority

superiority详解:怎么读、什么意思、用法