unappealable
简明释义
英[ʌnəˈpiːləb(ə)l]美[ˈʌnəˈpiləbl]
adj. 不可上诉的
英英释义
不可上诉的;最终的,确定的。 |
单词用法
不可上诉的决定 | |
不可上诉的判决 | |
作出不可上诉的裁决 | |
被认为不可上诉的 |
同义词
反义词
可上诉的 | 法院的决定在30天内是可上诉的。 | ||
可修订的 | 她的合同可以根据绩效评估进行修订。 |
例句
1.Their decisions on whether to indict someone have mostly been unappealable.
他们是否起诉犯罪嫌疑人的决定大部分情况下都是不可上诉的。
2.The judges' ruling in the Supreme court is unappealable.
不能对最高法院的法官的裁决提出上诉。
3.The disclosure is aimed to execute a ruling of an unappealable court or an arbitration award.
执行不可上诉的法院判决裁定以及仲裁裁决。
4.The disclosure is aimed to execute a ruling of an unappealable court or an arbitration award.
执行不可上诉的法院判决裁定以及仲裁裁决。
5.Her promotion was based on an unappealable decision made by the board of directors.
她的晋升基于董事会做出的一个不可上诉的决定。
6.Once the ruling is unappealable, all parties must comply with the judgment.
一旦裁决是不可上诉的,所有相关方必须遵守判决。
7.The court's decision was deemed unappealable, meaning it could not be challenged in a higher court.
法庭的裁决被认为是不可上诉的,意味着不能在更高的法院进行挑战。
8.In some jurisdictions, certain administrative decisions are unappealable under specific conditions.
在某些法域内,特定条件下某些行政决定是不可上诉的。
9.The final verdict in this case is unappealable, leaving no room for further legal action.
此案的最终裁决是不可上诉的,没有进一步法律行动的余地。
作文
In the realm of law and justice, certain decisions are marked as unappealable, meaning that they cannot be challenged or contested in a higher court. This concept is crucial for maintaining the integrity and finality of judicial decisions. When a ruling is deemed unappealable, it signifies that the legal process has reached its conclusion, and the parties involved must accept the outcome without the possibility of further legal recourse. This can occur in various scenarios, such as administrative rulings or specific types of arbitration outcomes where the parties have agreed to limit their options for appeal.The implications of an unappealable decision can be profound. For instance, individuals or entities affected by such a ruling must come to terms with the consequences, which may include financial penalties, loss of rights, or other significant impacts. The finality of unappealable decisions serves to promote stability in the legal system, ensuring that once a matter has been adjudicated, it does not linger indefinitely in the courts.However, the concept of unappealable decisions can also raise concerns regarding fairness and justice. Critics argue that if a decision is irreversible, it places immense pressure on the initial adjudication process to be thorough and just. In some cases, errors made in the original trial or hearing may go uncorrected due to the unappealable nature of the ruling. This highlights the need for a robust legal framework that minimizes the chances of wrongful judgments and ensures that all parties receive a fair hearing.Moreover, the existence of unappealable decisions can lead to a sense of resignation among those who feel wronged. Knowing that there is no avenue for appeal can be disheartening, especially in cases where the stakes are high. It emphasizes the importance of having competent legal representation during initial proceedings to mitigate the risk of unfavorable outcomes that cannot be challenged later.In many jurisdictions, the law provides for certain exceptions where unappealable decisions might still be subject to review under extraordinary circumstances, such as new evidence coming to light or instances of blatant procedural errors. These exceptions serve as a safeguard against the potential rigidity of unappealable rulings, ensuring that justice can still be pursued in rare situations where the integrity of the legal process is called into question.Ultimately, while the notion of unappealable decisions plays a vital role in the legal system by providing closure and preventing endless litigation, it also necessitates a careful balance between finality and fairness. Legal professionals, lawmakers, and society at large must continually assess how best to navigate the complexities of unappealable rulings to uphold the principles of justice while also respecting the need for definitive conclusions in legal matters. As we strive for a more equitable legal system, understanding the implications of unappealable decisions will remain a key focus for all stakeholders involved in the pursuit of justice.
在法律和司法的领域中,某些决定被标记为不可上诉,这意味着它们无法在更高的法院中受到挑战或质疑。这个概念对于维护司法决定的完整性和最终性至关重要。当一个裁决被认为是不可上诉时,这标志着法律程序已经达到了结论,相关各方必须接受结果,而没有进一步法律追索的可能性。这种情况可能发生在各种场景中,例如行政裁决或特定类型的仲裁结果,在这些情况下,各方已同意限制其上诉选择。不可上诉决定的影响可能是深远的。例如,受到此类裁决影响的个人或实体必须接受后果,这可能包括财务处罚、权利丧失或其他重大影响。不可上诉裁决的最终性有助于促进法律系统的稳定,确保一旦问题得到裁决,就不会在法院中无休止地拖延。然而,不可上诉决定的概念也可能引发关于公平和正义的担忧。批评者认为,如果一个决定是不可逆转的,那么这就对初步裁决过程施加了巨大的压力,要求其必须全面和公正。在某些情况下,原审或听证中所犯的错误可能因裁决的不可上诉性质而无法得到纠正。这突显出需要一个健全的法律框架,以最小化错误判决的机会,并确保所有各方都能获得公正的听证。此外,不可上诉决定的存在可能导致那些感到受委屈的人产生一种绝望感。知道没有上诉途径可能令人沮丧,尤其是在利益高昂的案件中。这强调了在初步程序中拥有合格法律代表的重要性,以降低无法挑战的不利结果的风险。在许多司法管辖区,法律规定在特殊情况下某些不可上诉的决定仍可能在非常规情况下受到审查,例如新证据浮出水面或明显程序错误的实例。这些例外作为一种保障,防止不可上诉裁决的潜在僵化,确保在法律程序的完整性受到质疑的罕见情况下仍能够追求正义。最终,尽管不可上诉决定的概念在法律系统中发挥着至关重要的作用,通过提供结论并防止无尽的诉讼,但它也需要在最终性和公平之间进行仔细平衡。法律专业人士、立法者以及整个社会必须不断评估如何最好地应对不可上诉裁决的复杂性,以维护正义原则,同时尊重法律事务中明确结论的必要性。在我们努力实现更公平的法律系统的过程中,理解不可上诉决定的影响将始终是所有参与者在追求正义时的关键焦点。