denunciatory

简明释义

英[dɪˌnʌnsiˈeɪtəri]美[dɪˈnʌnsɪəˌtori]

adj. 指责的；攻击的；非难的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It's in this period that Milton increasingly begins to adopt, or assume, Saint Peter's confident and denunciatory rhetoric.

就是在这段时间弥尔顿越来越接受，去采用，圣彼得的有信心的责难似的语言。

2.It's in this period that Milton increasingly begins to adopt, or assume, Saint Peter's confident and denunciatory rhetoric.

就是在这段时间弥尔顿越来越接受，去采用，圣彼得的有信心的责难似的语言。

3.Denunciatory or abusive language; vituperation.

辱骂谴责的或谩骂的语言；

4.The article took a denunciatory tone towards the environmental policies of the previous administration.

这篇文章对前任政府的环境政策采取了谴责性的语气。

5.His denunciatory comments during the debate sparked a heated discussion among the audience.

他在辩论中的谴责性评论引发了观众之间的激烈讨论。

6.The film included several denunciatory scenes that criticized social injustice.

这部电影包含了几幕谴责性的场景，批评社会不公。

7.In her denunciatory letter, she outlined the unethical practices of the company.

在她的谴责性信中，她概述了该公司的不道德行为。

8.The politician's speech was filled with denunciatory remarks against corruption in the government.

这位政治家的演讲充满了对政府腐败的谴责性的言论。

作文

In today's society, the power of language cannot be underestimated. Words have the ability to inspire, motivate, and unite people, but they can also divide and condemn. One particular type of language that stands out in its capacity to criticize is what we refer to as denunciatory language. This form of expression serves to denounce or condemn actions, behaviors, or ideologies that are deemed unacceptable or harmful. Understanding the implications of denunciatory language is crucial, especially in a world where social justice and accountability are increasingly at the forefront of public discourse.To illustrate the impact of denunciatory language, consider the various movements that have emerged in recent years advocating for change. Activists often employ denunciatory rhetoric to highlight injustices and mobilize support against oppressive systems. For instance, during the Black Lives Matter movement, many speeches and writings included denunciatory statements aimed at police brutality and systemic racism. These powerful words not only shed light on critical issues but also galvanized communities to take action and demand justice.However, while denunciatory language can be a powerful tool for social change, it also has the potential to create division. When used excessively or without nuance, denunciatory rhetoric can alienate individuals who may feel attacked rather than encouraged to engage in constructive dialogue. It is essential to strike a balance between expressing discontent and fostering an environment where open conversations can occur. The challenge lies in using denunciatory language effectively without resorting to hostility or aggression.Moreover, the context in which denunciatory language is employed plays a significant role in its reception. In some cases, it may be necessary to call out harmful behaviors directly, especially when those in power refuse to acknowledge their wrongdoings. For example, whistleblowers often use denunciatory statements to expose corruption or unethical practices within organizations. Their courage to speak out can lead to significant changes and accountability.On the other hand, there are instances where denunciatory language can backfire, leading to defensiveness rather than understanding. In political discourse, for example, leaders may use denunciatory language to attack opponents, which can further polarize audiences and hinder productive discussions. This highlights the importance of considering the audience and the potential outcomes of using such language.In conclusion, denunciatory language is a powerful means of expressing discontent and advocating for change. It has the potential to unite individuals around a common cause and bring attention to pressing social issues. However, it is essential to wield this power responsibly, recognizing that words can either build bridges or create chasms. As we navigate complex conversations about justice and accountability, we must be mindful of how we use denunciatory language to ensure that our messages resonate positively and inspire meaningful action. Ultimately, the goal should be to foster understanding and collaboration while still holding individuals and systems accountable for their actions.

在当今社会，语言的力量不可小觑。言辞能够激励、鼓舞和团结人们，但它们也能分裂和谴责。我们所称之为denunciatory的语言类型在批评的能力上尤为突出。这种表达形式旨在谴责或指责那些被认为不可接受或有害的行为、举动或意识形态。理解denunciatory语言的含义至关重要，尤其是在社会正义和问责制日益成为公众话语中心的时代。为了说明denunciatory语言的影响，考虑近年来出现的各种倡导变革的运动。活动家们常常使用denunciatory修辞来强调不公正现象，并动员支持反对压迫制度。例如，在“黑人的命也是命”运动期间，许多演讲和著作中包含了针对警察暴行和系统性种族主义的denunciatory声明。这些强有力的言辞不仅揭示了关键问题，还激励社区采取行动，要求公正。然而，尽管denunciatory语言可以作为社会变革的强大工具，但它也有可能造成分裂。当过度或缺乏细致入微地使用时，denunciatory修辞可能会使那些感到被攻击的人疏远，而不是鼓励他们参与建设性的对话。在表达不满与营造开放对话环境之间找到平衡至关重要。挑战在于有效地使用denunciatory语言，而不诉诸敌意或攻击。此外，使用denunciatory语言的背景在其接受程度中起着重要作用。在某些情况下，直接呼吁有害行为是必要的，尤其是当掌权者拒绝承认其错误时。例如，揭发者通常使用denunciatory声明来揭露组织内部的腐败或不道德行为。他们勇敢发声的行为可以导致重大变化和问责。另一方面，有些情况下，denunciatory语言可能会适得其反，导致防御而非理解。在政治话语中，例如，领导者可能使用denunciatory语言来攻击对手，这可能进一步使听众极化并阻碍富有成效的讨论。这突显出考虑受众及使用这种语言的潜在结果的重要性。总之，denunciatory语言是表达不满和倡导变革的强大手段。它有可能将个人团结在共同事业周围，并引起对紧迫社会问题的关注。然而，负责任地使用这种力量至关重要，认识到言辞可以建立桥梁或制造鸿沟。当我们在复杂的正义和问责对话中航行时，我们必须注意如何使用denunciatory语言，以确保我们的信息积极共鸣并激发有意义的行动。最终，目标应是促进理解与合作，同时仍然对个人和系统的行为负责。