perjurer

简明释义

英[ˈpɜːdʒərə(r)]美[ˈpɜːrdʒərər]

n. 伪证者；[法] 作伪证者；伪誓者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mem. -- During the rest of the campaign this paper never referred to me in any other way than as "the infamous perjurer Twain."

〔备忘——在这场竞选运动中，这家报纸以后但凡提到我时，必称“臭名昭著的伪证犯吐温”。

2.Gentile subscribed it reluctantly, but in the upshot he was condemned and imprisoned as a perjurer.

詹蒂莱订阅它不情愿，但结果他谴责和监禁的作伪证者。

3.Mem. -- During the rest of the campaign this paper never referred to me in any other way than as "the infamous perjurer Twain."

〔备忘——在这场竞选运动中，这家报纸以后但凡提到我时，必称“臭名昭著的伪证犯吐温”。

4.Look upon the Infamous Perjurer!

看看这位声名狼藉的伪证犯！

5.The lawyer warned the witness that if they lied under oath, they could be charged as a perjurer.

律师警告证人，如果他们在宣誓下撒谎，可能会被控为伪证者。

6.The prosecution presented evidence that proved the defendant was a perjurer.

控方提供了证据，证明被告是一个伪证者。

7.The detective uncovered that the witness had previously been a perjurer in another case.

侦探发现该证人在另一起案件中曾经是伪证者。

8.A conviction of being a perjurer can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment.

被判为伪证者可能会导致严重的惩罚，包括监禁。

9.In court, the judge sternly reminded the perjurer that honesty is crucial in the pursuit of justice.

在法庭上，法官严厉提醒伪证者诚实在追求正义中至关重要。

作文

In a world where truth and integrity hold immense value, the role of a perjurer cannot be understated. A perjurer is someone who deliberately lies under oath, often in a court of law, betraying the trust placed in them by society. This act not only undermines the legal system but also erodes the very foundation of justice that we strive to uphold. The consequences of perjury can be far-reaching, affecting not just the immediate parties involved but also the broader community. Consider a scenario where a witness takes the stand in a court case. This person has been called upon to provide testimony that could sway the outcome of a trial. If this individual chooses to lie, becoming a perjurer, they are not merely committing an act of dishonesty; they are potentially ruining lives. The defendant may be wrongly convicted, or an innocent person may suffer due to false accusations. The ripple effect of such deceit can lead to a loss of faith in the judicial system, causing people to question the reliability of testimonies and the very principles of justice. The motivations behind why someone would choose to become a perjurer can vary widely. Some may be driven by fear, coercion, or the desire to protect someone they love. Others might be tempted by financial gain or the prospect of avoiding punishment for their actions. Regardless of the reasons, the choice to lie under oath reflects a profound moral failing. It signifies a willingness to prioritize personal interests over ethical obligations. Moreover, the repercussions for being a perjurer are severe. In many jurisdictions, perjury is considered a felony, carrying significant penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This legal framework serves as a deterrent, emphasizing the importance of honesty in legal proceedings. Yet, despite these consequences, instances of perjury continue to occur, highlighting the ongoing struggle between truth and deception. Education plays a crucial role in combating perjury. By instilling values of honesty and integrity from a young age, we can foster a culture where individuals understand the weight of their words and the importance of truthfulness. Schools and community organizations should emphasize the significance of ethical behavior, particularly in situations where one’s testimony can have serious implications. Furthermore, the legal system itself must continually evolve to address the challenges posed by perjury. This includes implementing stricter penalties for those found guilty of lying under oath and ensuring that witnesses are adequately informed about the ramifications of their actions. Additionally, the introduction of technology, such as video testimonies and other forms of evidence, can help corroborate statements made in court, reducing the chances of perjury going unchecked. In conclusion, the term perjurer embodies a grave violation of trust that can have devastating consequences for individuals and society as a whole. It is a reminder of the delicate balance between truth and falsehood that exists within our legal system. As we navigate through life, let us strive to uphold the values of honesty and integrity, recognizing that the truth is not just a legal obligation but a moral imperative. Only then can we work towards a society where justice prevails, and the role of the perjurer becomes a relic of the past.

在一个真相和诚信具有巨大价值的世界里，伪证者的角色不可小觑。伪证者是指在宣誓下故意撒谎的人，通常是在法庭上，背叛了社会赋予他们的信任。这一行为不仅破坏了法律体系，还侵蚀了我们努力维护的正义基础。伪证的后果可能是深远的，不仅影响直接相关的当事人，也影响更广泛的社区。想象一下，一个证人在法庭案件中作证的场景。这个人被召唤提供可能影响审判结果的证词。如果这个人选择撒谎，成为伪证者，他们不仅仅是在进行一次不诚实的行为；他们可能正在毁掉他人的生活。被告可能会被错误定罪，或者无辜的人可能因虚假指控而遭受苦难。这种欺骗的涟漪效应可能导致人们对司法系统失去信心，使人们质疑证词的可靠性和正义的基本原则。选择成为伪证者的动机可能各不相同。有些人可能出于恐惧、胁迫或想保护他们所爱的人而做出这样的选择。其他人可能会因财务利益或避免自己行为的惩罚而受到诱惑。无论原因如何，选择在宣誓下撒谎反映出深刻的道德缺失。这意味着一个人愿意将个人利益置于道德义务之上。此外，成为伪证者的后果是严重的。在许多法域中，伪证被视为重罪，面临重大处罚，包括监禁和罚款。这一法律框架作为威慑，强调了在法律程序中诚实的重要性。然而，尽管有这些后果，伪证的案例仍然不断出现，突显了真相与欺骗之间持续的斗争。教育在打击伪证方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过从小就灌输诚实和诚信的价值观，我们可以培养一种文化，使个人理解他们言辞的分量和诚实的重要性。学校和社区组织应强调道德行为的重要性，特别是在一个人的证词可能产生严重影响的情况下。此外，法律系统本身也必须不断发展，以应对伪证带来的挑战。这包括对那些被判撒谎的人实施更严格的惩罚，并确保证人充分了解其行为的后果。此外，引入技术，例如视频证词和其他证据形式，可以帮助证实法庭上所作的陈述，减少伪证未被发现的可能性。总之，伪证者这个词体现了一种严重的信任违反，可能对个人和整个社会产生毁灭性的后果。它提醒我们在法律系统中存在的真相与虚假之间的微妙平衡。在我们生活的旅程中，让我们努力维护诚实和诚信的价值观，认识到真相不仅仅是法律义务，更是道德责任。只有这样，我们才能朝着一个正义得以实现的社会迈进，而伪证者的角色将成为过去的遗物。