forced quotation

简明释义

欺行霸市价格

英英释义

例句

1.The article included a forced quotation that seemed out of context, raising questions about its validity.

这篇文章包含了一句强制引用，似乎脱离了上下文，引发了对其有效性的质疑。

2.In her presentation, she included a forced quotation that didn't quite fit her overall message.

在她的演示中，她引用了一句与整体信息不太契合的强制引用。

3.In academic writing, a forced quotation is often used to support an argument, even if it doesn't perfectly align with the author's viewpoint.

在学术写作中，强制引用通常用于支持论点，即使它与作者的观点并不完全一致。

4.During the debate, she relied on a forced quotation from a famous philosopher to make her point seem stronger.

在辩论中，她依赖于一位著名哲学家的强制引用来使她的观点显得更有力。

5.Using a forced quotation can sometimes mislead readers into thinking the author supports a certain idea.

使用强制引用有时会误导读者，让他们认为作者支持某个观点。

作文

In the realm of academic writing and literature, the concept of a forced quotation often emerges as a contentious issue. A forced quotation refers to the practice of inserting a quote into a piece of writing in a way that feels unnatural or obligatory, rather than organic. This can happen when a writer feels compelled to include a citation to meet a certain word count, adhere to academic standards, or simply to sound more authoritative. However, the use of forced quotations can detract from the overall quality of the work, making it seem disjointed or lacking in genuine engagement with the material.When writers resort to forced quotations, they often do so without fully considering the relevance of the quote to their argument or narrative. This can lead to a situation where the quote does not seamlessly integrate into the text, leaving readers confused about its purpose. For instance, if an author is discussing the impact of climate change on polar bears and suddenly inserts a quote about the economic implications of fossil fuel extraction, the transition might feel jarring. Readers may question why this particular quote was included and how it relates to the topic at hand.Moreover, forced quotations can undermine the credibility of the writer. When quotes are used merely for the sake of inclusion, it suggests a lack of original thought or analysis. This is particularly problematic in academic environments, where critical thinking and the ability to synthesize information are highly valued. Instead of enhancing the argument, forced quotations can make it appear as though the writer is trying to mask their own ideas with the words of others, which can be perceived as intellectual dishonesty.To avoid falling into the trap of forced quotations, writers should strive for authenticity in their work. This means carefully selecting quotes that genuinely enhance their arguments or provide necessary context. It is essential to ensure that every quote serves a clear purpose and is relevant to the discussion. For example, if a writer is examining the effects of deforestation on biodiversity, including a quote from a leading environmentalist about the importance of forests would naturally fit into the narrative and strengthen the overall message.Additionally, writers should consider paraphrasing or summarizing ideas instead of relying heavily on direct quotes. This approach allows for greater flexibility in integrating ideas while maintaining the original meaning. It also encourages writers to engage more deeply with the source material, fostering a better understanding of the subject matter.In conclusion, while quotations can be powerful tools in writing, the practice of using forced quotations can be detrimental to the clarity and integrity of a piece. Writers should aim for thoughtful integration of quotes that enhance their arguments and reflect their unique voice. By doing so, they can produce more compelling and authentic work that resonates with readers. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a seamless blend of original thought and supporting evidence, rather than relying on forced quotations that detract from the overall quality of the writing.

在学术写作和文学领域，“强制引用”这一概念往往成为一个有争议的话题。“强制引用”是指将引用插入到写作中，以一种不自然或强迫的方式，而不是有机的方式。这种情况发生在作者感到必须包含某个引文，以满足特定的字数要求、遵循学术标准，或仅仅是为了听起来更权威。然而，使用强制引用可能会削弱作品的整体质量，使其看起来支离破碎或缺乏对材料的真正参与。当作者诉诸于强制引用时，他们往往没有充分考虑该引用与他们论点或叙述的相关性。这可能导致一种情况，即引用未能无缝地融入文本，使读者对其目的感到困惑。例如，如果一位作者正在讨论气候变化对北极熊的影响，突然插入关于化石燃料开采经济影响的引用，那么这种过渡可能会让人感到突兀。读者可能会质疑为什么这个特定的引用被包括在内，以及它与所讨论主题的关系。此外，强制引用可能会削弱作者的可信度。当引用仅仅是为了包含而使用时，这表明缺乏原创思想或分析。这在学术环境中尤其成问题，因为批判性思维和信息综合能力被高度重视。强制引用不仅不会增强论点，反而可能使作者看起来试图用他人的话掩盖自己的想法，这可能被视为知识不诚实。为了避免陷入强制引用的陷阱，作者应努力在作品中保持真实性。这意味着要仔细选择真正增强其论点或提供必要背景的引用。确保每个引用都有明确的目的，并与讨论相关至关重要。例如，如果作者正在研究森林砍伐对生物多样性的影响，引用一位领先环保主义者关于森林重要性的言论将自然适合叙述并加强整体信息。此外，作者应考虑改写或总结观点，而不是过度依赖直接引用。这种方法允许在整合思想时有更大的灵活性，同时保持原意。它还鼓励作者更深入地参与源材料，从而促进对主题的更好理解。总之，虽然引用在写作中可以是强大的工具，但使用强制引用的做法可能会对作品的清晰度和完整性产生不利影响。作者应旨在深思熟虑地整合引用，以增强其论点并反映其独特的声音。通过这样做，他们可以创作出更具吸引力和真实性的作品，与读者产生共鸣。最终，目标应该是创造原创思想与支持证据的无缝融合，而不是依赖于削弱写作整体质量的强制引用。