lobotomizes
简明释义
vt. 为……施行脑叶切开术;使迟钝
vi. 施行脑叶切断术
第 三 人 称 单 数 l o b o t o m i z e s
现 在 分 词 l o b o t o m i z i n g
过 去 式 l o b o t o m i z e d
过 去 分 词 l o b o t o m i z e d
英英释义
单词用法
对患者进行脑叶切除 | |
使思维变得简单化 | |
麻木情感 | |
外科手术切除 | |
在心理上切除 | |
通过手术进行脑叶切除 |
同义词
反义词
增强 | 这个新程序增强了认知能力。 | ||
刺激 | 锻炼刺激大脑功能。 | ||
赋权 | 教育赋予个人批判性思维的能力。 |
例句
1.Some argue that standardized testing lobotomizes students' critical thinking skills.
有人认为标准化考试削弱了学生的批判性思维能力。
2.The new policy effectively lobotomizes creativity in the workplace.
这项新政策有效地削弱了工作场所的创造力。
3.Excessive regulations lobotomize innovation in the tech industry.
过多的法规削弱了科技行业的创新能力。
4.The repetitive tasks lobotomize employees, making them feel disengaged.
重复的任务削弱了员工的参与感。
5.When art becomes too commercialized, it lobotomizes its original intent.
当艺术过于商业化时,它会削弱其原本的意图。
作文
In the realm of psychology and mental health, the term lobotomizes refers to a controversial surgical procedure that was once used to treat various mental disorders. This procedure involves severing connections in the brain's prefrontal cortex, which is believed to be responsible for complex behaviors and emotions. Although it was once hailed as a breakthrough in psychiatric treatment during the mid-20th century, the practice of lobotomizes has since been widely discredited due to its severe side effects and ethical implications.The history of lobotomy can be traced back to the 1930s when Portuguese neurologist António Egas Moniz first performed the procedure. Moniz believed that by disrupting the neural pathways in the frontal lobe, he could alleviate symptoms of mental illness, such as depression and anxiety. His work earned him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1949, and lobotomy quickly gained popularity in psychiatric hospitals around the world.However, the reality of lobotomizes was far from the idealistic vision presented by its proponents. Patients who underwent the procedure often experienced drastic personality changes, loss of cognitive functions, and emotional numbness. Many were left unable to care for themselves or engage in meaningful relationships. The procedure was particularly notorious for its irreversible effects, leading to a significant outcry from mental health advocates and the general public.As the understanding of mental health evolved, so did the approach to treatment. Psychotropic medications and psychotherapy emerged as more humane and effective alternatives to lobotomizes. These methods allowed patients to manage their symptoms without permanently altering their brains. The shift away from lobotomy marked a significant turning point in the field of psychiatry, emphasizing the importance of patient autonomy and informed consent.In contemporary discussions about mental health, the legacy of lobotomizes serves as a cautionary tale. It reminds us of the potential dangers of medical interventions that prioritize quick fixes over holistic care. The ethical implications of lobotomy highlight the necessity of thorough research, respect for patient rights, and the pursuit of treatments that prioritize the well-being of individuals.Furthermore, the term lobotomizes has transcended its medical origins and is often used metaphorically in modern discourse. For example, one might say that certain societal pressures or technological advancements can 'lobotomize' our ability to think critically or feel deeply. This figurative use underscores the broader implications of the original procedure, suggesting that something can be stripped away from our humanity without physical alteration.In conclusion, the term lobotomizes encapsulates a complex history of psychiatric treatment that raises important questions about ethics, effectiveness, and the nature of mental health care. As we continue to advance in our understanding of the human mind, it is crucial to remember the lessons learned from the past. Ensuring that mental health treatments are compassionate, respectful, and evidence-based will help prevent the mistakes of history from repeating themselves. The story of lobotomizes serves as a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge must always be tempered with a commitment to humanity and ethical responsibility.
在心理学和心理健康领域,术语lobotomizes指的是一种曾经用于治疗各种精神障碍的有争议的外科手术。这种手术涉及切断大脑前额皮层中的连接,据信该区域负责复杂行为和情感。尽管在20世纪中叶,该手术曾被誉为精神病治疗的突破,但由于其严重的副作用和伦理影响,lobotomizes的做法已经被广泛否定。脑叶切除术的历史可以追溯到1930年代,当时葡萄牙神经学家安东尼奥·埃加斯·莫尼兹首次进行该手术。莫尼兹相信,通过破坏额叶中的神经通路,可以缓解抑郁症和焦虑症等精神疾病的症状。他的工作使他获得了1949年的诺贝尔生理或医学奖,脑叶切除术迅速在全球的精神病医院中流行开来。然而,lobotomizes的现实远非其倡导者所描绘的理想化愿景。接受该手术的患者常常经历剧烈的人格变化、认知功能丧失和情感麻木。许多人被留下无法照顾自己或参与有意义的关系。该手术因其不可逆转的影响而臭名昭著,引发了心理健康倡导者和公众的强烈抗议。随着对心理健康的理解不断发展,治疗方法也随之改变。精神药物和心理治疗作为更人道和有效的替代方案出现,取代了lobotomizes。这些方法使患者能够在不永久改变大脑的情况下管理他们的症状。对脑叶切除术的转变标志着精神病学领域的重要转折点,强调了患者自主权和知情同意的重要性。在当代关于心理健康的讨论中,lobotomizes的遗产充当了警示故事。它提醒我们注意那些优先考虑快速解决方案而非整体护理的医疗干预的潜在危险。脑叶切除术的伦理影响突显了彻底研究、尊重患者权利以及追求以个人福祉为重心的治疗的重要性。此外,术语lobotomizes已经超越了其医学起源,常常在现代话语中被比喻使用。例如,有人可能会说某些社会压力或技术进步可以“脑叶切除”我们的批判性思维能力或深刻感受能力。这种比喻用法强调了原始手术的更广泛影响,表明某些东西可以在没有身体改变的情况下剥夺我们的人性。总之,术语lobotomizes概括了精神病治疗的复杂历史,提出了有关伦理、有效性和心理健康护理性质的重要问题。随着我们在理解人类思维方面的不断进步,回顾过去所吸取的教训至关重要。确保心理健康治疗是富有同情心、尊重且基于证据的,将有助于防止历史错误的重演。lobotomizes的故事提醒我们,追求知识必须始终与对人性和伦理责任的承诺相结合。