jesuitry

简明释义

英[ˈdʒɛz.jʊ.ɪ.tri]美[ˈdʒɛz.juˌɪ.tri]

n. 狡猾；阴险；耶稣会教义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The politician's speech was criticized for its jesuitry, as it seemed to twist facts to fit his agenda.

这位政治家的演讲因其耶稣会的诡辩而受到批评，因为它似乎扭曲了事实以符合他的议程。

2.His arguments were filled with jesuitry, making it difficult to discern the truth.

他的论点充满了耶稣会的诡辩，让人难以辨别真相。

3.The lawyer’s jesuitry impressed the jury, even if it lacked moral clarity.

律师的耶稣会的诡辩给陪审团留下了深刻印象，即使缺乏道德清晰度。

4.Her response was a perfect example of jesuitry, cleverly avoiding the main issue.

她的回答是耶稣会的诡辩的完美例子，巧妙地避开了主要问题。

5.In debates, some people resort to jesuitry instead of presenting solid evidence.

在辩论中，有些人诉诸于耶稣会的诡辩，而不是提供确凿的证据。

作文

In the realm of philosophical discourse, the term jesuitry refers to the cunning and often deceptive reasoning associated with the Jesuits, a religious order known for their intellectual rigor and strategic thinking. This concept is particularly relevant in discussions about ethics and morality, where the ends are sometimes seen as justifying the means. The Jesuits, founded in the 16th century, were not only missionaries but also scholars who engaged deeply with the cultural and intellectual currents of their time. Their ability to navigate complex moral landscapes has led to the perception of jesuitry as a form of sophisticated argumentation that can sometimes obscure the truth.To illustrate this point, consider the complexities involved in political debates. Politicians often employ jesuitry to persuade the public or to justify controversial decisions. They may present arguments that appear logical on the surface but are designed to manipulate perceptions rather than convey genuine truths. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates might use jesuitry to frame their opponents' policies in a negative light, highlighting flaws while downplaying their own shortcomings. This strategic maneuvering can confuse voters and lead to decisions based on misinterpretations of facts.Moreover, jesuitry can be observed in everyday situations, such as negotiations in business or personal relationships. Individuals may resort to this form of reasoning to gain an advantage, using clever language and persuasive tactics to achieve their goals. While some might argue that such tactics are merely part of effective communication, others see them as ethically questionable, raising concerns about honesty and integrity. The balance between persuasion and deception is a delicate one, and the line can often become blurred when jesuitry is employed.The implications of jesuitry extend beyond individual interactions; they can shape societal norms and expectations. In cultures where manipulation is normalized, trust can erode, leading to a general skepticism towards communication. People may become wary of engaging in discussions, fearing that they will be subjected to jesuitry that obscures the truth. This trend can stifle open dialogue and inhibit the exchange of ideas, ultimately undermining the democratic process.In conclusion, understanding jesuitry is crucial for navigating the complexities of contemporary discourse. It serves as a reminder to critically evaluate the arguments presented to us, recognizing that not all reasoning is straightforward or honest. By being aware of the potential for jesuitry in various contexts, we can cultivate a more discerning approach to communication, fostering a culture of transparency and integrity. As we engage with the world around us, let us strive to uphold the values of honesty and clarity, resisting the allure of jesuitry in our own reasoning and interactions.

耶稣会的策略在哲学讨论领域中，指的是与耶稣会相关的狡猾和通常具有欺骗性的推理，这个宗教团体以其智力严谨和战略思维而闻名。这个概念在关于伦理和道德的讨论中尤为重要，在这些讨论中，手段有时被视为可以为目的辩护。耶稣会成立于16世纪，他们不仅是传教士，也是深入参与当时文化和智力潮流的学者。他们在复杂的道德环境中游刃有余，使得耶稣会的策略被视为一种复杂的论证形式，有时可能会掩盖真相。为了说明这一点，考虑一下政治辩论中涉及的复杂性。政治家们常常使用耶稣会的策略来说服公众或为有争议的决定辩护。他们可能会提出表面上看似合乎逻辑的论点，但这些论点旨在操纵感知，而不是传达真实的真相。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能会使用耶稣会的策略来将对手的政策框架化为负面，突出缺陷，同时淡化自己的缺点。这种战略性操作可能会混淆选民，导致基于对事实的误解而做出的决定。此外，耶稣会的策略还可以在日常情境中观察到，例如商业或人际关系中的谈判。个人可能会诉诸这种推理形式以获得优势，使用巧妙的语言和说服策略来实现他们的目标。虽然一些人可能会争辩说，这种策略仅仅是有效沟通的一部分，但其他人则认为它在伦理上值得怀疑，引发了对诚实和完整性的关注。在说服和欺骗之间保持平衡是一个微妙的过程，当使用耶稣会的策略时，这条界限往往会变得模糊。耶稣会的策略的影响超越了个人互动；它们可以塑造社会规范和期望。在操控被正常化的文化中，信任可能会侵蚀，导致人们普遍对沟通产生怀疑。人们可能会变得不愿意参与讨论，担心自己会被迫接受耶稣会的策略，从而掩盖真相。这一趋势可能会抑制开放的对话，并阻碍思想的交流，最终削弱民主进程。总之，理解耶稣会的策略对驾驭当代话语的复杂性至关重要。它提醒我们批判性地评估呈现给我们的论点，认识到并非所有的推理都是直接或诚实的。通过意识到在各种背景下存在耶稣会的策略的潜力，我们可以培养一种更具洞察力的沟通方式，促进透明度和完整性的文化。当我们与周围的世界互动时，让我们努力维护诚实和清晰的价值观，抵制在我们自己的推理和互动中使用耶稣会的策略的诱惑。