meritocracy

简明释义

英[ˌmerɪˈtɒkrəsi]美[ˌmerɪˈtɑːkrəsi]

n. 精英领导体制，精英管理的社会；精英领导阶级

复 数 m e r i t o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It is, in many ways, a pure meritocracy.

从许多方面来看，这都是纯粹的实力主义。

2.Our faith in meritocracy is deeply held and hardly questioned.

我们对精英制度的信仰是根深蒂固的和不可质疑的。

3.Nor is there any doubt that in many cases low female representation also reflects a broader lack of meritocracy in corporate culture.

女董事比例小也反映出企业文化缺少精英领导。在多数情况下毋庸置疑。

4.It would be a grave mistake to abandon old-fashioned meritocracy just at the time when it is turning to women's advantage.

传统的精英管理制度对女性越来越有利，现在抛弃它真是大错特错了。

5.'should that mix be 50% or 60%? We should always remain fundamentally a meritocracy,' he said.

他说，这个比例应该是50%还是60% ？

6.There's a major difference between the US aristocracy and the meritocracy though.

但是美国的贵族治理跟精英治理两种模式之间还是有一个巨大的差别的。

7.Many believe that education is the key to achieving a meritocracy in society.

许多人相信教育是实现社会优才制的关键。

8.The company's promotion policy is designed to create a meritocracy where hard work is recognized.

公司的晋升政策旨在创造一个承认努力工作的优才制。

9.In a true meritocracy, individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and achievements.

在一个真正的优才制中，个人根据其能力和成就获得奖励。

10.Critics argue that the current system does not reflect a true meritocracy due to systemic biases.

批评者认为，由于系统性偏见，目前的制度并未反映出真正的优才制。

11.In a meritocracy, people from all backgrounds have an equal opportunity to succeed.

在一个优才制中，所有背景的人都有平等的成功机会。

作文

In contemporary society, the concept of meritocracy has gained significant attention and discussion. Defined as a system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement, meritocracy suggests that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed based on their talents and efforts. This idea resonates with many, as it promotes fairness and justice in social and professional environments.However, the reality of meritocracy is often more complex than its idealistic definition. In theory, a meritocracy allows individuals from various backgrounds to rise through the ranks based solely on their skills and contributions. For instance, in an educational setting, students who work hard and demonstrate their capabilities should be rewarded with scholarships and opportunities for further education. Similarly, in the workplace, promotions and recognitions should ideally be awarded to those who excel in their roles, regardless of their personal backgrounds.Yet, numerous factors can hinder the true implementation of a meritocracy. Socioeconomic status, access to quality education, and even systemic biases can create barriers that prevent individuals from fully realizing their potential. For example, children from affluent families often have access to better educational resources, extracurricular activities, and networking opportunities, which can give them a significant advantage over their less privileged peers. This disparity raises questions about whether our societies truly operate under a meritocracy or if they are merely cloaked in the guise of fairness.Moreover, the emphasis on meritocracy can sometimes lead to a toxic culture of competition. When society values individual achievement above all else, it can foster an environment where collaboration and support are undervalued. People may feel pressured to constantly outperform their peers, leading to stress, anxiety, and a lack of genuine connection among individuals. In such a competitive landscape, the original intent of a meritocracy—to promote fairness and reward hard work—can become distorted.Additionally, the notion of meritocracy can also inadvertently perpetuate inequality. If success is solely attributed to individual effort, it can obscure the structural inequalities that exist within society. This perspective may lead to the belief that those who fail to succeed simply did not work hard enough, ignoring the systemic obstacles they face. Therefore, while meritocracy aims to celebrate talent and hard work, it is essential to recognize and address the broader societal issues that impact individuals’ abilities to thrive.In conclusion, while the idea of meritocracy presents an appealing vision of a fair and just society, we must critically examine its practical implications. It is crucial to acknowledge the various factors that influence success and to strive for a system that not only rewards individual merit but also addresses the underlying inequalities that can hinder true achievement. By fostering a more inclusive approach that values collaboration and provides equitable opportunities, we can work towards a society that genuinely embodies the principles of meritocracy while ensuring that all individuals have the chance to succeed based on their abilities and efforts.

在当代社会，meritocracy（精英主义）的概念引起了广泛关注和讨论。它被定义为一种基于个人能力或成就进行晋升的制度，meritocracy意味着每个人都有平等的机会根据自己的才能和努力取得成功。这一理念与许多人产生共鸣，因为它在社会和职业环境中促进了公平和正义。然而，meritocracy的现实往往比其理想化的定义更为复杂。在理论上，meritocracy允许来自不同背景的个人仅凭其技能和贡献而晋升。例如，在教育环境中，努力学习并展示能力的学生应获得奖学金和进一步教育的机会。同样，在工作场所，晋升和表彰理应授予那些在岗位上表现出色的人，而不论他们的个人背景。然而，许多因素可能会阻碍meritocracy的真正实施。社会经济地位、优质教育的获取，甚至系统性偏见都可能形成障碍，阻止个人充分发挥潜力。例如，来自富裕家庭的孩子通常可以获得更好的教育资源、课外活动和人际网络，这使他们相比于不那么特权的同龄人具有显著优势。这种差距引发了一个问题，即我们的社会是否真的在meritocracy的框架下运作，还是仅仅披上了公平的外衣。此外，对meritocracy的强调有时也会导致竞争文化的毒害。当社会将个人成就置于一切之上时，可能会滋生一种忽视协作和支持的环境。人们可能会感到必须不断超越同龄人，从而导致压力、焦虑以及人与人之间缺乏真正的联系。在这样一个竞争激烈的环境中，meritocracy的初衷——促进公平和奖励努力——可能会变得扭曲。此外，meritocracy的观念也可能无意中延续不平等。如果成功完全归因于个人努力，可能会掩盖社会中存在的结构性不平等。这种观点可能导致对未能成功的人产生这样的信念：他们不过是没有足够努力，而忽视了他们面临的系统性障碍。因此，虽然meritocracy旨在庆祝才能和努力，但至关重要的是要认识到并解决影响个人蓬勃发展的更广泛社会问题。总之，尽管meritocracy的理念呈现出一个公平公正社会的迷人愿景，但我们必须批判性地审视其实际影响。承认影响成功的各种因素，并努力建立一个不仅奖励个人才能，还解决根本不平等问题的制度至关重要。通过培养一种更具包容性的方法，重视合作并提供公平的机会，我们可以朝着一个真正体现meritocracy原则的社会迈进，同时确保所有人都有机会根据自己的能力和努力取得成功。