agricultural subsidies

简明释义

农业补贴

英英释义

例句

1.Farmers often depend on agricultural subsidies for their income.

农民通常依赖农业补贴作为他们的收入来源。

2.The EU has a complex system of agricultural subsidies to support its farmers.

欧盟有一个复杂的农业补贴系统来支持其农民。

3.The government has increased its agricultural subsidies to support local farmers during the drought.

政府增加了对当地农民在干旱期间的农业补贴支持。

4.Critics argue that agricultural subsidies distort market competition.

批评者认为农业补贴扭曲了市场竞争。

5.Many countries rely on agricultural subsidies to stabilize food prices.

许多国家依赖农业补贴来稳定食品价格。

作文

Agricultural subsidies, or 农业补贴, play a crucial role in shaping the agricultural landscape of many countries around the world. These financial aids provided by governments are designed to support farmers, stabilize food prices, and ensure a steady supply of agricultural products. As we delve deeper into the implications of 农业补贴, it becomes clear that they have both positive and negative consequences for the economy, the environment, and society at large.One of the primary benefits of 农业补贴 is that they help to maintain the livelihood of farmers. In an industry often plagued by unpredictable weather patterns, fluctuating market prices, and rising production costs, these subsidies provide a safety net for agricultural producers. For instance, during times of drought or flooding, farmers can rely on 农业补贴 to help cover their losses and continue their operations. This stability is essential not only for farmers but also for consumers, as it helps to ensure a consistent supply of food.Moreover, 农业补贴 can promote food security within a nation. By supporting local agriculture, governments can reduce dependence on imported food, which can be subject to price volatility and supply chain disruptions. This is particularly important in times of global crises, such as pandemics or geopolitical tensions, where food supply can be severely impacted. Thus, 农业补贴 can be seen as a strategic investment in a country’s self-sufficiency and resilience.However, the implementation of 农业补贴 is not without its challenges and criticisms. One major concern is that these subsidies can lead to overproduction and environmental degradation. When farmers receive financial incentives to grow certain crops, they may prioritize quantity over quality, resulting in unsustainable farming practices. This can lead to soil depletion, water scarcity, and loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the focus on specific crops can distort market dynamics, leading to a surplus of certain products while neglecting others that may be equally important for a balanced diet.Additionally, 农业补贴 can create an uneven playing field in the agricultural sector. Large agribusinesses often benefit disproportionately from these subsidies, as they have the resources and influence to navigate the bureaucratic processes involved in obtaining them. This can disadvantage small-scale farmers, who may struggle to compete in a market skewed by government intervention. As a result, the very policies intended to support farmers can inadvertently contribute to greater inequality within the agricultural industry.In conclusion, 农业补贴 are a double-edged sword that requires careful consideration and management. While they provide essential support to farmers and contribute to food security, they also pose risks to the environment and can exacerbate inequalities in the agricultural sector. Policymakers must strive to strike a balance between providing necessary assistance to farmers and promoting sustainable practices that protect our natural resources. Only then can 农业补贴 fulfill their intended purpose of fostering a resilient and equitable agricultural system.

农业补贴，即农业补贴，在塑造世界许多国家的农业格局中发挥着至关重要的作用。这些由政府提供的财政援助旨在支持农民，稳定食品价格，并确保农业产品的稳定供应。深入探讨农业补贴的影响后，我们可以清楚地看到，它们对经济、环境和整个社会都有积极和消极的影响。农业补贴的主要好处之一是它们帮助维持农民的生计。在一个常常受到不可预测的天气模式、市场价格波动和生产成本上升困扰的行业中，这些补贴为农业生产者提供了安全网。例如，在干旱或洪水期间，农民可以依靠农业补贴来帮助弥补损失并继续运营。这种稳定性对农民和消费者都至关重要，因为它有助于确保食品的持续供应。此外，农业补贴可以促进国家的食品安全。通过支持本地农业，政府可以减少对进口食品的依赖，而进口食品可能会受到价格波动和供应链中断的影响。这在全球危机时期尤为重要，例如大流行病或地缘政治紧张局势，食品供应可能会受到严重影响。因此，农业补贴可以被视为对国家自给自足和韧性的战略投资。然而，农业补贴的实施并非没有挑战和批评。一个主要的担忧是这些补贴可能导致过度生产和环境退化。当农民获得财政激励以种植特定作物时，他们可能会优先考虑数量而非质量，从而导致不可持续的耕作实践。这可能导致土壤耗竭、水资源短缺和生物多样性丧失。此外，专注于特定作物可能会扭曲市场动态，导致某些产品的过剩，而忽视其他同样重要的产品，这可能对均衡饮食至关重要。此外，农业补贴可能会在农业部门内造成不平等竞争的环境。大型农业企业往往不成比例地受益于这些补贴，因为他们拥有资源和影响力来应对获得补贴所涉及的官僚程序。这可能使小规模农民处于劣势，他们可能难以在受到政府干预影响的市场中竞争。因此，原本旨在支持农民的政策可能无意中加剧农业行业内部的不平等。总之，农业补贴是一把双刃剑，需要谨慎考虑和管理。虽然它们为农民提供必要的支持并促进食品安全，但它们也对环境构成风险，并可能加剧农业部门的不平等。政策制定者必须努力在为农民提供必要援助与促进保护自然资源的可持续实践之间取得平衡。只有这样，农业补贴才能实现其促进韧性和公平农业系统的预期目的。