simplistic

简明释义

英[sɪmˈplɪstɪk]美[sɪmˈplɪstɪk]

adj. 过分简单化的；过分单纯化的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.No doubt our modeling of exoplanet atmospheres is simplistic.

我们对外星大气层的模型无疑是最简单的。

2.It is too simplistic, however, to dismiss the culture as brainwashing.

不过，将谷歌的公司文化贬为洗脑可就过于简单化了。

3.Figure 1 provides a simplistic overview of the CEI.

图1提供了CEI的简单概述。

4.That is too simplistic.

这未免太简单化了。

5.That way of putting it assumes a simplistic nature-nurture dichotomy.

这种看法假定了一种简单的先天-后天两分法。

6.As you can imagine, Figure 1 is too simplistic.

可以想象，图1过于简单。

7.Of course, this solution is rather simplistic.

当然，这种解决办法是相当简单的。

8.The advertisement presented a simplistic 简单化的 portrayal of the product, making it seem too good to be true.

广告对产品的<顺便提及>简单化的描绘，使其看起来好得令人难以置信。

9.His simplistic 简单粗暴的 solution to the problem ignored its complexities.

他对问题的<顺便提及>简单粗暴的解决方案忽视了其复杂性。

10.Her simplistic 简单化的 explanation failed to capture the nuances of the situation.

她的<顺便提及>简单化的解释未能捕捉到情况的细微差别。

11.The teacher warned against a simplistic 过于简单化的 view of history, urging students to consider multiple perspectives.

老师警告不要对历史持有<顺便提及>过于简单化的观点，鼓励学生考虑多个视角。

12.Many critics found the movie's ending to be simplistic 过于简单的 and unrealistic.

许多评论家发现这部电影的结局<顺便提及>过于简单的且不切实际。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, we are often bombarded with information from various sources. This constant influx can lead to a tendency to oversimplify complex issues. Many individuals fall into the trap of having a simplistic view of the world, where they believe that problems can be solved with straightforward solutions. However, this approach can be misleading and potentially harmful. To illustrate this point, consider the issue of climate change. Some people argue that simply reducing carbon emissions is enough to combat global warming. While this action is undoubtedly important, the reality is much more complicated. Climate change is influenced by numerous factors, including deforestation, industrial pollution, and economic policies. A simplistic understanding of the problem may lead to ineffective solutions that fail to address the root causes of the issue.Moreover, political discussions often suffer from simplistic interpretations. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates may present their policies in a way that suggests they have easy answers to complex societal challenges. Voters might be drawn to these simplistic narratives, believing that one policy can solve issues such as poverty, education, or healthcare. However, the reality is that these problems require multifaceted approaches and long-term commitment.In our personal lives, we also encounter simplistic thinking. When faced with a difficult decision, it is tempting to look for quick fixes or black-and-white answers. For example, if someone is struggling with stress at work, they might think that quitting their job is the only solution. This simplistic mindset overlooks other possibilities, such as seeking support, improving time management skills, or addressing underlying issues related to workplace culture.The danger of simplistic thinking lies in its potential to foster misunderstanding and conflict. When we reduce complex issues to mere slogans or sound bites, we risk alienating those who hold different views. This can create an environment where constructive dialogue is stifled, and polarization increases. To counteract this trend, it is essential to embrace complexity and nuance in our discussions.One effective way to challenge simplistic thinking is through education. By fostering critical thinking skills, we can encourage individuals to analyze situations from multiple perspectives. This approach not only enriches our understanding but also promotes empathy and collaboration. Engaging in thoughtful discussions, reading diverse viewpoints, and questioning our assumptions can help us move beyond simplistic conclusions.In conclusion, while it may be tempting to adopt a simplistic perspective on various issues, doing so can lead to misunderstandings and ineffective solutions. Whether discussing global challenges like climate change, navigating political landscapes, or making personal decisions, it is crucial to recognize the complexity of the situations we face. By embracing a more nuanced approach, we can foster better understanding, promote informed decision-making, and work towards more effective solutions to the challenges that confront us today. Ultimately, moving away from simplistic thinking allows us to engage with the world in a more meaningful and impactful way.

在当今快节奏的世界中，我们常常会受到来自各种来源的信息轰炸。这种不断涌入的信息可能导致人们倾向于过于简单化复杂问题。许多人陷入了对世界持有一种简单化的看法，他们认为问题可以通过简单的解决方案来解决。然而，这种方法可能会误导并可能造成伤害。为了说明这一点，考虑一下气候变化的问题。有些人认为，仅仅减少碳排放就足以应对全球变暖。虽然这一行动无疑是重要的，但现实要复杂得多。气候变化受许多因素的影响，包括森林砍伐、工业污染和经济政策。对问题的简单化的理解可能导致无效的解决方案，无法解决问题的根本原因。此外，政治讨论往往也受到简单化的解释的影响。例如，在选举活动期间，候选人可能会以一种方式呈现他们的政策，暗示他们对复杂的社会挑战有简单的答案。选民可能会被这些简单化的叙述所吸引，认为一项政策可以解决贫困、教育或医疗等问题。然而，现实是，这些问题需要多方面的方法和长期的承诺。在我们的个人生活中，我们也会遇到简单化的思维。当面临困难决定时，寻找快速解决方案或非黑即白的答案是很诱人的。例如，如果有人在工作中感到压力，他们可能会认为辞掉工作是唯一的解决办法。这种简单化的心态忽略了其他可能性，例如寻求支持、改善时间管理技能或解决与工作场所文化相关的潜在问题。简单化的思维的危险在于它可能助长误解和冲突。当我们将复杂问题简化为口号或标语时，我们冒着疏远持不同观点的人的风险。这可能创造一个建设性对话被压制、两极分化加剧的环境。为了抵消这种趋势，接受复杂性和细微差别至关重要。挑战简单化的思维的一种有效方式是通过教育。通过培养批判性思维能力，我们可以鼓励个人从多个角度分析情况。这种方法不仅丰富了我们的理解，还促进了同理心和合作。参与深思熟虑的讨论、阅读多种观点以及质疑我们的假设，可以帮助我们超越简单化的结论。总之，虽然采用简单化的视角看待各种问题可能很诱人，但这样做可能导致误解和无效的解决方案。无论是讨论气候变化等全球挑战、驾驭政治格局，还是做出个人决策，认识到我们所面临情况的复杂性至关重要。通过采用更细致的方法，我们可以促进更好的理解，推动明智的决策，并朝着更有效的解决方案迈进，以应对当今面临的挑战。最终，摆脱简单化的思维使我们能够以更有意义和影响力的方式与世界互动。