prejudication

简明释义

英[ˌprɛdʒʊdɪˈkeɪʃən]美[ˌprɛdʒʊdɪˈkeɪʃən]

n. 判例；预断裁决

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Disregard of corporate personality system originated in the States, and it is acknowledged by more and more countries as prejudication or legislation with the improvement of corporate personality.

公司法人人格否认制度起源于美国，随着公司法人人格否认法理和制度的不断完善，越来越多国家以判例或立法的形式认可了公司法人人格否认。

2.Germany Court had to use prejudication based on Contract Liability Theory in order to protect injured third party.

德国法院不得不通过判例以合同责任理论作为解释的基础，扩张合同效力来保护受损害的第三人。

3.It is necessary to cite the legal theory on emergency to avoid an immediate danger, but waits for the direction of the policy and the support of the prejudication in the practices.

认为院前急救中的特殊情形是符合紧急避险的构件要求的，但在实践中还有待政策上的指导和法律上的判例支持。

4.The beginning of the teaching method of cases in law can be traced back to the teaching method of prejudication founded by Landor of the law Institute of Harvard University in 1870.

法学案例教学之发端可以溯至1870年哈佛大学法学院朗道尔所创立的判例教学法。

5.Disregard of corporate personality system originated in the States, and it is acknowledged by more and more countries as prejudication or legislation with the improvement of corporate personality.

公司法人人格否认制度起源于美国，随着公司法人人格否认法理和制度的不断完善，越来越多国家以判例或立法的形式认可了公司法人人格否认。

6.In order to improve the quality of report forms, the artificial prejudication needs to be reinforced.

为使报表质量达到要求，需加强人工预审工作。

7.The attorney warned against prejudication 预先裁决 as it could lead to an unjust outcome.

律师警告不要出现prejudication 预先裁决，因为这可能导致不公正的结果。

8.In legal contexts, prejudication 预先裁决 refers to a decision made before all evidence is presented.

在法律背景下，prejudication 预先裁决 指的是在所有证据提出之前做出的决定。

9.The judge emphasized that any form of prejudication 预先裁决 could compromise the fairness of the trial.

法官强调，任何形式的prejudication 预先裁决 都可能影响审判的公正性。

10.The concept of prejudication 预先裁决 is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

在维持司法过程的完整性方面，prejudication 预先裁决 的概念至关重要。

11.A jury must avoid prejudication 预先裁决 to ensure an impartial verdict.

陪审团必须避免prejudication 预先裁决，以确保公正的裁决。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the term prejudication refers to a judgment or decision made before all evidence has been presented or without a complete understanding of the situation at hand. This concept can often lead to unfair outcomes, as it implies that a conclusion has been reached prematurely. The implications of prejudication extend beyond the courtroom; they resonate in various aspects of life, including personal relationships, workplace dynamics, and societal interactions. To illustrate this point, consider a scenario in which an employer hastily judges an employee's performance based on a single incident rather than evaluating their overall contributions. This prejudication can result in demotivation for the employee, who may feel misunderstood and undervalued. It highlights the importance of thorough assessment and open communication in professional environments. When decisions are made without full consideration, the consequences can be detrimental not only to individuals but also to organizational culture. Similarly, in personal relationships, prejudication can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. For instance, if friends form opinions about each other based on hearsay or isolated incidents, it can create rifts that are difficult to mend. Trust is fundamental in any relationship, and when judgments are made prematurely, it undermines that trust. Therefore, fostering an environment where open dialogue is encouraged can help mitigate the risks associated with prejudication. On a societal level, prejudication can manifest in various forms of discrimination and bias. When groups of people are judged based on stereotypes or preconceived notions, it perpetuates a cycle of injustice and inequality. For example, racial profiling by law enforcement is a stark representation of how prejudication can lead to systemic issues within society. It is crucial for communities to work towards breaking down these biases through education and awareness, promoting a more equitable society where individuals are judged based on their actions and character rather than assumptions. Moreover, the legal system itself must strive to minimize prejudication to uphold the principles of justice. Judges and juries are expected to remain impartial and base their decisions on the evidence presented during a trial. However, the reality is that biases can seep into the judicial process, affecting the outcomes of cases. It is essential for legal professionals to recognize their own potential for prejudication and work diligently to ensure that their judgments are fair and just. In conclusion, the concept of prejudication serves as a reminder of the importance of patience, thoroughness, and open-mindedness in our judgments. Whether in legal matters, personal relationships, or societal interactions, taking the time to gather all relevant information before forming an opinion can lead to more just and equitable outcomes. By acknowledging the dangers of prejudication, we can foster environments that prioritize understanding and fairness, ultimately benefiting ourselves and those around us.

在法律和正义的领域中，术语prejudication指的是在所有证据尚未呈现或对情况缺乏全面理解的情况下做出的判断或决定。这个概念往往会导致不公平的结果，因为它暗示着结论是在过早达成的。prejudication的影响超越了法庭，它在生活的各个方面都有共鸣，包括个人关系、职场动态和社会互动。为了说明这一点，考虑一个情境：雇主匆忙根据单一事件判断员工的表现，而不是评估他们的整体贡献。这种prejudication可能导致员工的失去动力，他们可能感到被误解和不被重视。这突显了在专业环境中进行全面评估和开放沟通的重要性。当没有充分考虑就做出决定时，后果可能对个人以及组织文化都是有害的。同样，在个人关系中，prejudication可能导致误解和冲突。例如，如果朋友们根据传闻或孤立事件形成对彼此的看法，这可能会造成难以修复的裂痕。信任是任何关系的基础，当提前做出判断时，就会破坏这种信任。因此，促进一个鼓励开放对话的环境可以帮助减轻与prejudication相关的风险。在社会层面上，prejudication可以以各种形式的歧视和偏见表现出来。当人们群体基于刻板印象或先入之见被判断时，它助长了不公正和不平等的循环。例如，执法机构的种族定性就是prejudication如何导致社会内部系统性问题的明显表现。社区必须努力通过教育和意识来打破这些偏见，促进一个更公平的社会，在这个社会中，个人是根据他们的行为和品格而不是假设来被判断的。此外，法律系统本身必须努力最小化prejudication以维护正义原则。法官和陪审团应保持公正，并根据审判中提出的证据做出决定。然而，现实是，偏见可能渗透到司法过程中，影响案件的结果。法律专业人士必须认识到自己可能存在的prejudication，并努力确保他们的判断是公平和公正的。总之，prejudication的概念提醒我们在判断中耐心、全面和开放思维的重要性。无论是在法律事务、个人关系还是社会互动中，在形成意见之前花时间收集所有相关信息都可以导致更公正和平等的结果。通过承认prejudication的危险，我们可以营造出优先考虑理解和公平的环境，最终使我们自己和周围的人受益。