refutations

简明释义

英[ˌrɛfjʊˈteɪʃənz]美[ˌrɛfjʊˈteɪʃənz]

n. [计]反驳；反演（refutation 的复数形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I. Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations.

拉卡·托斯，证明和反驳。

2.The work captures an interesting moment during which modernism and its refutations began to coexist.

这项工作捕捉到一个有趣的时刻，现代主义和它的辩驳开始并存。

3.The work captures an interesting moment during which modernism and its refutations began to coexist.

这项工作捕捉到一个有趣的时刻，现代主义和它的辩驳开始并存。

4.Israel and Palestine: Reappraisals, Revisions, Refutations.

以色列和巴勒斯坦：重估、修正、驳斥。

5.The lawyer's refutations were crucial in proving her client's innocence.

律师的反驳对证明她客户的无辜至关重要。

6.His book is filled with refutations of popular myths in nutrition science.

他的书中充满了对营养科学流行神话的反驳。

7.In her debate, she provided strong refutations to counter the opposing arguments.

在辩论中，她提供了有力的反驳来反击对方的论点。

8.The scientist presented several refutations of the outdated theory, demonstrating its flaws.

这位科学家提出了几项反驳过时理论的证据，展示了其缺陷。

9.The article included refutations of common misconceptions about climate change.

这篇文章包含了对气候变化常见误解的反驳。

作文

In the realm of academic writing and critical thinking, the concept of refutations plays a crucial role in the development of logical arguments. A refutation is essentially a counter-argument that disproves or challenges an opposing claim. This process is vital not only in debates but also in essays, research papers, and even everyday discussions. The ability to effectively present refutations can significantly enhance the persuasiveness of one’s argument and demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic at hand.To illustrate the importance of refutations, consider a debate on climate change. One side may argue that human activities are the primary cause of global warming, while the opposing side might claim that natural cycles are responsible. In this scenario, a robust refutation would involve presenting scientific evidence, such as data from climate models or historical climate patterns, that clearly shows the impact of human activities on the environment. By providing a well-structured refutation, the debater not only strengthens their own position but also encourages critical thinking among the audience.Moreover, in academic writing, refutations serve to acknowledge and address potential counterarguments. This approach not only demonstrates the writer's awareness of differing viewpoints but also reinforces their credibility. For instance, if a researcher is arguing for renewable energy sources, they might include a refutation of the claim that such sources are too expensive. By presenting data on the decreasing costs of solar panels and wind turbines, the writer effectively counters the opposing argument, making their case more compelling.The structure of a good refutation typically involves several key components: stating the opposing argument, presenting evidence that contradicts it, and explaining why this evidence is significant. This format not only clarifies the writer's stance but also guides the reader through the reasoning process. It is important to remain respectful and objective when crafting refutations, as this fosters a constructive dialogue rather than a confrontational exchange.Furthermore, the skill of formulating refutations is not limited to formal writing or debates; it is equally applicable in everyday conversations. For example, during a discussion about health and nutrition, one might encounter the assertion that a high-carb diet is unhealthy. A well-articulated refutation could involve citing studies that highlight the benefits of carbohydrates for energy and overall health, thereby enriching the conversation and providing a more nuanced understanding of the topic.In conclusion, mastering the art of refutations is essential for anyone engaged in critical discourse. Whether in academic settings, professional environments, or casual conversations, the ability to challenge opposing views with well-reasoned arguments not only enhances one’s credibility but also contributes to a more informed and balanced dialogue. As we continue to navigate complex issues in society, the practice of formulating effective refutations will undoubtedly remain a valuable skill for fostering understanding and promoting intellectual growth.

在学术写作和批判性思维的领域中，反驳这一概念在逻辑论证的发展中发挥着至关重要的作用。反驳本质上是一个反对论点的反驳或挑战。这一过程不仅在辩论中至关重要，也在论文、研究报告甚至日常讨论中扮演着重要角色。有效地提出反驳可以显著增强论点的说服力，并展示对所讨论主题的深入理解。为了说明反驳的重要性，我们可以考虑一个关于气候变化的辩论。一方可能会争辩说，人类活动是全球变暖的主要原因，而对方则可能声称自然周期是罪魁祸首。在这种情况下，一个有力的反驳将涉及提供科学证据，例如气候模型的数据或历史气候模式，清楚地表明人类活动对环境的影响。通过提供结构良好的反驳，辩论者不仅强化了自己的立场，还鼓励听众进行批判性思考。此外，在学术写作中，反驳的作用是承认并应对潜在的反对意见。这种方法不仅展示了作者对不同观点的认识，还增强了他们的可信度。例如，如果一位研究人员主张可再生能源，他可能会包括对可再生能源过于昂贵这一说法的反驳。通过提供关于太阳能电池板和风力涡轮机成本下降的数据，作者有效地反驳了对立论点，使他们的论据更具说服力。一个好的反驳的结构通常涉及几个关键组成部分：陈述对立论点，提供与之矛盾的证据，以及解释这些证据的重要性。这种格式不仅澄清了作者的立场，还引导读者理解推理过程。在撰写反驳时，保持尊重和客观是很重要的，因为这有助于促进建设性的对话，而不是对抗性的交流。此外，形成反驳的技能不仅限于正式写作或辩论；它同样适用于日常对话。例如，在关于健康与营养的讨论中，可能会遇到高碳水化合物饮食不健康的说法。一个合理的反驳可能涉及引用强调碳水化合物对能量和整体健康益处的研究，从而丰富讨论内容，并提供对主题的更细致理解。总之，掌握反驳艺术对任何参与批判性讨论的人来说都是必不可少的。无论是在学术环境、专业场合还是休闲对话中，能够用经过深思熟虑的论据挑战对立观点不仅增强了个人的可信度，也为更全面和平衡的对话做出了贡献。在我们继续应对社会中的复杂问题时，形成有效的反驳的实践无疑将是一项宝贵的技能，有助于促进理解和推动智力成长。