retribution

简明释义

英[ˌretrɪˈbjuːʃ(ə)n]美[ˌretrɪˈbjuːʃn]

n. 报应；惩罚；报答；报偿

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She is the goddess of righteous anger; divine retribution and vengeance, but only where vengeance is actually fair in balance.

她是愤怒女神，天惩女神，复仇女神，但仅限于公正的复仇。

2.And what other group could we taunt without fear of retribution?

还有哪些人我们可以嘲笑戏弄，不用害怕遭到报应？

3.He has promised not to impose a policy of retribution.

他也保证不会强加惩罚政策。

4."They tend to threaten desecrators with divine retribution by the council of the gods, " Ikram said.

“他们往往会以众神之神的报应来威胁亵渎者，”埃克拉姆说。

5.This is a time for reflection, not retribution.

这是一个反思而不是惩罚的时刻。

6.Happiness and courage, retribution or justice are secondary ends for them.

幸福和勇气，报应或正义都是次要他们的目的。

7.She is the goddess of righteous anger; divine retribution and vengeance, but only where vengeance is actually fair in balance.

她是愤怒女神，天惩女神，复仇女神，但仅限于公正的复仇。

8.Employees must be able to express their concerns-truthfully and completely-without fear of retribution.

雇员必须能够真实、完全地表达他们的忧虑，不会被报复。

9.The judge decided that the criminal deserved harsh retribution 报应 for his actions.

法官决定这个罪犯因其行为应受到严厉的报应。

10.The concept of retribution 报应 is often debated in discussions about justice.

在关于正义的讨论中，报应的概念常常被辩论。

11.Some people argue that retribution 报应 is necessary to maintain order in society.

一些人认为报应对于维护社会秩序是必要的。

12.In ancient times, many cultures believed in divine retribution 报应 for wrongdoing.

在古代，许多文化相信对不当行为的神圣报应。

13.He feared that his actions would lead to retribution 报应 from those he had wronged.

他担心自己的行为会导致被他伤害的人进行报应。

作文

Retribution is a concept that has permeated various aspects of human society, from literature to law, and even to personal relationships. At its core, retribution refers to the idea of punishment or vengeance for wrongdoing. It embodies the belief that individuals who commit offenses should face consequences that are proportionate to their actions. This notion is deeply rooted in moral philosophy and often raises questions about justice, fairness, and the nature of human behavior.In many cultures, retribution serves as a foundational principle of justice systems. The idea is that when someone commits a crime, they should be held accountable for their actions. This accountability is not merely for the sake of punishment but also serves to deter others from committing similar offenses. For instance, in criminal law, the imposition of sentences aims to provide retribution while also promoting social order and safety.However, the application of retribution can be complex. While some argue that it is a necessary aspect of justice, others believe that it can lead to a cycle of violence and revenge. For example, in cases of violent crime, the desire for retribution can sometimes overshadow the need for rehabilitation and forgiveness. This raises important ethical questions: Is it just to seek revenge? Does retribution truly serve justice, or does it perpetuate suffering?Literature often explores the theme of retribution through characters and narratives that emphasize the consequences of actions. Classic works such as Shakespeare's "Hamlet" delve into the psychological ramifications of seeking retribution. The protagonist's quest for vengeance leads to a tragic chain of events, ultimately questioning the morality of his actions. Such stories illustrate that while retribution may provide a sense of closure, it can also lead to unforeseen consequences that affect not only the wrongdoer but also innocent parties.In personal relationships, the concept of retribution can manifest in various ways. When someone feels wronged, the instinct for retribution may arise, leading to feelings of anger and resentment. However, this approach can often damage relationships further, creating a toxic cycle of blame and retaliation. Instead, many advocate for forgiveness and understanding as healthier alternatives that promote healing rather than harm.In conclusion, retribution is a multifaceted concept that plays a significant role in our understanding of justice, morality, and human interaction. While it serves as a crucial element in the pursuit of justice, it also invites reflection on the potential consequences of seeking vengeance. Balancing the need for accountability with compassion and understanding remains a challenge in both societal and personal contexts. Ultimately, the discourse surrounding retribution encourages us to consider how we respond to wrongdoing and the values we prioritize in our quest for justice and resolution.

报应是一个渗透到人类社会各个方面的概念，从文学到法律，甚至到个人关系。在其核心，报应指的是对错误行为的惩罚或复仇的理念。它体现了这样一种信念：那些犯下罪行的人应该面对与其行为成比例的后果。这个概念深深植根于道德哲学中，并常常引发关于正义、公平和人类行为本质的问题。在许多文化中，报应作为司法体系的基础原则。其思想是，当有人犯罪时，他们应该为自己的行为负责。这种责任不仅仅是为了惩罚，还旨在阻止其他人犯下类似的罪行。例如，在刑法中，判处刑罚的目的是提供报应，同时促进社会秩序和安全。然而，报应的应用可能很复杂。虽然一些人认为这是正义的必要方面，但另一些人则认为这可能导致暴力和复仇的循环。例如，在暴力犯罪的案件中，寻求报应的愿望有时可能掩盖了康复和宽恕的需要。这提出了重要的伦理问题：寻求复仇是否公正？报应真的能实现正义，还是会延续痛苦？文学作品常常通过强调角色和叙述的方式探讨报应这一主题。经典作品如莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》深入探讨了寻求报应的心理影响。主人公对复仇的追求导致了一系列悲惨的事件，最终质疑了他行为的道德性。这些故事说明，尽管报应可能带来一种结束感，但也可能导致无法预见的后果，影响到不仅仅是违法者，还有无辜的一方。在个人关系中，报应的概念可以以各种方式表现出来。当某人感到受委屈时，报应的本能可能会出现，导致愤怒和怨恨的情绪。然而，这种方式往往会进一步破坏关系，形成指责和报复的有毒循环。相反，许多人主张宽恕和理解作为更健康的替代方案，以促进治愈而非伤害。总之，报应是一个多面向的概念，在我们理解正义、道德和人际互动方面发挥着重要作用。尽管它在追求正义中是一个关键元素，但它也引发了对寻求复仇潜在后果的反思。在社会和个人背景中，平衡问责制与同情心和理解的需要仍然是一个挑战。最终，围绕报应的讨论促使我们考虑如何回应错误行为以及在追求正义和解决问题时优先考虑的价值观。