inquisitional

简明释义

英[ˌɪnkwɪˈzɪʃən(ə)l]美[ˌɪnkwɪˈzɪʃənl]

adj. 调查的；宗教裁判所的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Chinese e-government obtained a great development in the last few years, however, no matter reflected by society public or domestic and international inquisitional data, it hasn't an ideal effect.

中国的电子政务建设在近几年取得了骄人的成绩，然而无论是从社会公众的反映还是从国内外的调查资料来看，其实际的应用效果不如人意。

2.Chinese e-government obtained a great development in the last few years, however, no matter reflected by society public or domestic and international inquisitional data, it hasn't an ideal effect.

中国的电子政务建设在近几年取得了骄人的成绩，然而无论是从社会公众的反映还是从国内外的调查资料来看，其实际的应用效果不如人意。

3.His inquisitional methods were effective in uncovering hidden information during the investigation.

他审问的方法在调查中有效地揭露了隐藏的信息。

4.During the meeting, her inquisitional style made everyone feel uncomfortable as she pressed for details.

在会议期间，她的审问的风格让每个人都感到不安，因为她追问细节。

5.The inquisitional nature of the interview left the candidate feeling overwhelmed and anxious.

面试的审问的性质让候选人感到不知所措和焦虑。

6.The detective's approach was almost inquisitional, leaving no stone unturned in his search for the truth.

侦探的调查方式几乎是审问的，在寻找真相时毫不放过任何线索。

7.The documentary took an inquisitional approach to exploring controversial topics.

这部纪录片采用了审问的方式来探讨有争议的话题。

作文

In the realm of justice and law, the term inquisitional refers to a system or process that involves an active investigation by a judge or tribunal. This contrasts sharply with the adversarial system commonly found in many Western countries, where two parties present their cases before an impartial judge or jury. The inquisitional approach is often associated with historical contexts, particularly during the times of the Inquisition, where the church sought to root out heresy through rigorous questioning and investigation. While the concept may seem archaic, its implications resonate in modern legal systems, especially in jurisdictions that still employ elements of this method.The inquisitional system is characterized by a more proactive role of the judge, who not only oversees the proceedings but also actively participates in gathering evidence and questioning witnesses. This can lead to a more thorough examination of the facts, as the judge seeks to uncover the truth rather than merely adjudicate between opposing arguments. However, this system is not without its criticisms. Detractors argue that the inquisitional method can lead to abuses of power, as the judge's dual role as investigator and adjudicator may compromise impartiality. The potential for bias is a significant concern, as the judge may develop preconceived notions based on the evidence they have gathered.Moreover, the inquisitional process can be seen as less transparent than its adversarial counterpart. In an adversarial system, both parties have equal opportunity to present their case, and the proceedings are typically more public. In contrast, the inquisitional model may involve closed-door sessions and secretive investigations, which can undermine public trust in the judicial process. The lack of transparency can also hinder the accused's ability to defend themselves effectively, as they may not have access to all the evidence being considered against them.Despite these challenges, there are certain contexts where the inquisitional approach may be beneficial. For instance, in complex cases involving intricate details or specialized knowledge, having a judge take an active role in investigating the facts can lead to a more informed outcome. Additionally, in situations where the stakes are high, such as cases involving national security or serious crimes, a more thorough investigation may be warranted to ensure justice is served.In conclusion, the term inquisitional encapsulates a unique judicial approach that emphasizes investigation and truth-seeking over adversarial debate. While it has its roots in historical practices, its relevance in contemporary legal systems cannot be overlooked. As societies continue to grapple with issues of justice, fairness, and transparency, the balance between inquisitional and adversarial methods will remain a topic of significant discourse among legal scholars and practitioners alike. Understanding the nuances of the inquisitional system is crucial for anyone interested in the evolution of law and its impact on society. The challenges and benefits it presents must be carefully weighed to foster a judicial system that upholds justice while protecting the rights of individuals.

在法律和司法的领域中，术语inquisitional指的是一种涉及法官或法庭积极调查的系统或过程。这与许多西方国家普遍采用的对抗性系统形成鲜明对比，在这种系统中，双方在公正的法官或陪审团面前陈述各自的案件。inquisitional的方法通常与历史背景相关，特别是在宗教裁判所时期，教会试图通过严格的质询和调查来根除异端。尽管这一概念看似陈旧，但其影响在现代法律系统中仍然引起共鸣，尤其是在仍然采用该方法某些元素的司法管辖区。inquisitional系统的特点是法官在程序中的更主动角色，他不仅监督诉讼，还积极参与收集证据和质询证人。这可能导致对事实的更全面审查，因为法官寻求揭示真相，而不仅仅是在对立的论点之间进行裁决。然而，该系统并非没有批评者。反对者认为，inquisitional方法可能导致权力滥用，因为法官作为调查者和裁决者的双重角色可能妨碍公正。偏见的潜在可能性是一个重大担忧，因为法官可能根据他们收集的证据形成先入之见。此外，inquisitional过程可能被视为比对抗性同行更不透明。在对抗性系统中，双方都有平等的机会呈现其案件，程序通常更加公开。相比之下，inquisitional模型可能涉及闭门会议和秘密调查，这可能削弱公众对司法过程的信任。不透明性也可能妨碍被告有效辩护，因为他们可能无法获取针对他们的所有证据。尽管面临这些挑战，但在某些情况下，inquisitional方法可能是有益的。例如，在涉及复杂细节或专业知识的复杂案件中，让法官积极参与调查事实可能导致更明智的结果。此外，在涉及国家安全或严重犯罪等高风险情况下，更彻底的调查可能是合理的，以确保公正得到实现。总之，术语inquisitional概括了一种独特的司法方法，强调调查和寻求真相，而不是对抗性的辩论。尽管它根植于历史实践，但其在当代法律系统中的相关性不容忽视。随着社会继续应对正义、公平和透明性的问题，inquisitional和对抗性方法之间的平衡将始终是法律学者和从业者之间重要讨论的话题。理解inquisitional系统的细微差别对于任何对法律演变及其对社会影响感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。必须仔细权衡其所提出的挑战和好处，以促进一个既维护正义又保护个人权利的司法系统。