totalizing

简明释义

英[ˈtəʊtəlaɪzɪŋ]美[ˈtotlˌaɪz]

adj. 使联合成整体的

v. 使联合成整体；总计；累加（totalize的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Large (. 25" high), easy to read 6-digit non-resettable totalizing counter. Provides precise indication of current consumed. Ideal for metal thickness control monitoring."

我们公司生产的安培小时计.25“高，装有读取6位数字的计数器。读数精确，适用于金属厚度控制监控。

2.Firstly, the functions, including flow totalizing, flow display, record, report and networking, of the VX3000 flow totalizing recorder which is designed on above basis are presented emphatically.

重点阐述了在此基础上设计的VX3000流量积算记录仪的流量积算、流量显示、记录、报表和联网功能。

3.Firstly, the functions, including flow totalizing, flow display, record, report and networking, of the VX3000 flow totalizing recorder which is designed on above basis are presented emphatically.

重点阐述了在此基础上设计的VX3000流量积算记录仪的流量积算、流量显示、记录、报表和联网功能。

4.By replacing the analog flow measurement and totalizing instrument with LJ21E programmable flow calculator, the system accuracy will be better than 0. 8%.

以LJ21E可编程流量演算仪取代模拟式流量测量和积算仪表，可使系统精度优于0.8%。

5.An extension of the spindle shaft drives a counter for totalizing discharge.

心轴的延长部分带动一个累计流量的计量器。

6.Wu Chengdian's photography cleverly deconstructs these symbolic structures by refusing to grant them a totalizing presence that transcends discrete perspective.

吴承典的摄影作品巧妙地解构了这些象征性的建筑物，拒绝赋予它们超越不连续视角的完整外观。

7.In literature, a totalizing 整体化的 narrative can sometimes overshadow more nuanced perspectives.

在文学中，一个totalizing 整体化的叙述有时会掩盖更微妙的观点。

8.The documentary aimed to present a totalizing 整体化的 view of climate change impacts worldwide.

这部纪录片旨在呈现气候变化影响的totalizing 整体化的全球视角。

9.Many critics believe that totalizing 整体化的 ideologies can be harmful to social discourse.

许多评论家认为，totalizing 整体化的意识形态可能对社会话语造成伤害。

10.The philosopher argued that the theory was too totalizing 整体化的, ignoring individual experiences.

这位哲学家认为这个理论过于totalizing 整体化的，忽视了个体的经历。

11.Some sociologists warn against totalizing 整体化的 theories that fail to account for cultural diversity.

一些社会学家警告说，要避免那些未能考虑文化多样性的totalizing 整体化的理论。

作文

In today's world, we often encounter various ideologies and perspectives that shape our understanding of society and individual roles within it. One concept that has gained attention is the idea of totalizing (整体化的) narratives, which seek to provide a comprehensive framework for interpreting human experiences. These narratives can be found in politics, religion, and even in the way we consume media. However, while they may offer a sense of clarity, they can also lead to oversimplification and exclusion of diverse viewpoints.The term totalizing (整体化的) refers to any approach or ideology that attempts to explain all aspects of life through a single lens. For instance, a political regime might adopt a totalizing (整体化的) ideology that dictates how citizens should think, behave, and interact with one another. This can create an environment where dissenting opinions are not tolerated, leading to a homogenization of thought. In such contexts, individuals may feel pressured to conform to the dominant narrative, stifling creativity and critical thinking.Moreover, totalizing (整体化的) frameworks can often ignore the complexities of human experience. Take, for example, the realm of social justice. A totalizing (整体化的) perspective might suggest that all issues of inequality stem from a single source, such as capitalism or systemic racism. While these factors undoubtedly play significant roles, they do not account for the myriad of influences that contribute to social disparities. By adopting a more nuanced approach, we can better understand the intricate web of causes and effects that characterize societal issues.In literature and art, totalizing (整体化的) narratives can also be problematic. Authors and artists who embrace a totalizing (整体化的) viewpoint may create works that lack depth and fail to resonate with the diverse experiences of their audiences. For instance, a novel that portrays a singular experience of love or loss may alienate readers who have encountered different forms of these emotions. In contrast, works that embrace complexity and ambiguity tend to foster a richer dialogue and allow for multiple interpretations.Furthermore, the rise of social media has amplified the dangers of totalizing (整体化的) narratives. Online platforms often promote content that aligns with users' existing beliefs, creating echo chambers where alternative perspectives are dismissed. This phenomenon can lead to radicalization, as individuals become increasingly entrenched in their views, viewing opposing opinions as threats rather than opportunities for discussion. To combat this, it is crucial for individuals to engage with a variety of sources and challenge their own beliefs, fostering a culture of open-mindedness.In conclusion, while totalizing (整体化的) narratives may provide a semblance of understanding and order, they often come at the cost of nuance and diversity. It is essential to recognize the limitations of such approaches and strive for a more inclusive understanding of the world around us. By embracing complexity and fostering dialogue, we can cultivate a richer and more meaningful discourse that honors the multifaceted nature of human experience. Ultimately, it is through this engagement with complexity that we can hope to build a more equitable and understanding society.

在今天的世界中，我们经常遇到各种意识形态和观点，这些都塑造了我们对社会和个人角色的理解。一个引起关注的概念是totalizing（整体化的）叙事，它试图提供一个全面的框架来解释人类经历。这些叙事可以在政治、宗教，甚至我们消费媒体的方式中找到。然而，虽然它们可能提供一种清晰感，但也可能导致简化和排除多样化的观点。“totalizing”（整体化的）一词指的是任何试图通过单一视角解释生活各个方面的方法或意识形态。例如，一个政治政权可能会采用一种totalizing（整体化的）意识形态，规定公民应该如何思考、行为和互动。这可能会创造一个不容忍异议的环境，从而导致思想的同质化。在这样的背景下，个人可能会感到被迫顺应主流叙事，压制创造力和批判性思维。此外，totalizing（整体化的）框架往往忽略人类经验的复杂性。以社会正义领域为例，一个totalizing（整体化的）视角可能会暗示所有不平等的问题都源于单一因素，如资本主义或系统性种族主义。虽然这些因素无疑发挥着重要作用，但它们并未考虑到造成社会差距的众多影响。通过采用更细致入微的方法，我们可以更好地理解构成社会问题的错综复杂的因果关系。在文学和艺术中，totalizing（整体化的）叙事也可能是有问题的。那些接受totalizing（整体化的）观点的作者和艺术家可能创作出缺乏深度且无法与观众多样化经历产生共鸣的作品。例如，一部描绘单一爱情或失落经历的小说可能会使经历过不同形式这些情感的读者感到疏离。相反，拥抱复杂性和模糊性的作品通常能促进更丰富的对话，并允许多重解读。此外，社交媒体的兴起放大了totalizing（整体化的）叙事的危险。在线平台通常会推广与用户现有信仰一致的内容，创造出回音室，替代观点被驳斥。这种现象可能导致极端化，因为个人变得越来越固执己见，将对立意见视为威胁而非讨论的机会。为此，个人必须参与多样化的信息来源，挑战自己的信仰，培养开放的文化。总之，虽然totalizing（整体化的）叙事可能提供一种理解和秩序的表象，但往往以细微差别和多样性为代价。认识到这种方法的局限性，并努力追求更具包容性的世界观至关重要。通过拥抱复杂性和促进对话，我们可以培养一种更丰富、更有意义的讨论，尊重人类经历的多面性。最终，正是通过这种对复杂性的参与，我们才能希望建立一个更加公平和理解的社会。