centralist

简明释义

英[ˈsentrəlɪst]美[ˈsentrəlɪst]

adj. 中央集权制的，拥护中央集权的

n. 中央集权主义者

复 数 c e n t r a l i s t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Carrying out the system of accountant's centralist accounting is important measure to refrom and improve on the public financial systems in China.

实行会计集中核算制度是建立和完善我国公共财政体系的一项重要措施。

2.Carrying out the system of accountant's centralist accounting is important measure to refrom and improve on the public financial systems in China.

实行会计集中核算制度是建立和完善我国公共财政体系的一项重要措施。

3.In debates about state rights, the centralist view often argues for a stronger federal authority.

在关于州权的辩论中，中央集权的观点通常主张加强联邦权威。

4.The centralist policies implemented by the administration were met with significant opposition from local leaders.

行政部门实施的中央集权政策遭到了地方领导人的强烈反对。

5.The government adopted a more centralist approach to ensure uniform policies across the nation.

政府采取了更为中央集权的方法，以确保全国政策的一致性。

6.The centralist ideology promotes the idea that centralized decision-making is essential for national unity.

这种中央集权意识形态提倡集中决策对于国家团结的重要性。

7.Many believe that a centralist system can lead to inefficiencies and lack of responsiveness to local needs.

许多人认为，中央集权制度可能导致效率低下，并且对地方需求缺乏响应。

作文

In the realm of political theory, the term centralist refers to an ideology that emphasizes the centralization of power within a governing body. This concept has been pivotal in shaping various forms of government throughout history. A centralist approach often advocates for a strong national government that holds the majority of decision-making authority, as opposed to distributing power among local or regional entities. This essay will explore the implications of centralist governance, its historical context, and its relevance in today's political landscape.Historically, many nations have adopted centralist policies to maintain unity and stability. For example, during the formation of the United States, the Federalists championed a centralist framework. They believed that a robust federal government was essential for managing the diverse interests of the states and ensuring the nation's survival. This perspective was particularly significant in the aftermath of the Articles of Confederation, which had created a weak central authority unable to address pressing national issues.However, the centralist model is not without its critics. Opponents argue that concentrating power in a central authority can lead to tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties. They advocate for a decentralized approach that allows local governments greater autonomy to address the unique needs of their communities. This debate between centralist and decentralist ideologies continues to be a defining feature of political discourse worldwide.In contemporary politics, the rise of global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and economic inequality has prompted some to reconsider the merits of centralist governance. Proponents argue that these complex issues require coordinated responses that only a centralized authority can effectively provide. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries with centralist systems were able to implement nationwide health measures swiftly and uniformly, potentially saving lives.Conversely, the pandemic also highlighted the limitations of centralist approaches. In some cases, central authorities struggled to address local needs, leading to frustration and resistance at the community level. This has sparked renewed interest in federalism and other decentralized models that empower local governments to tailor their responses to specific circumstances.The balance between centralist and decentralized governance is a delicate one. While centralization can facilitate efficient decision-making and implementation of policies, it can also stifle innovation and responsiveness to local issues. Therefore, finding a middle ground that combines the strengths of both approaches may be the key to effective governance in the 21st century.In conclusion, the concept of centralist governance plays a crucial role in shaping political systems and addressing societal challenges. As we navigate an increasingly interconnected world, the dialogue surrounding centralist versus decentralized governance will remain vital. Understanding the implications of these ideologies can help us create more effective and equitable political structures that serve the needs of all citizens. Whether one leans towards a centralist view or advocates for decentralization, the ultimate goal should be to foster a government that is responsive, accountable, and capable of addressing the complexities of modern life.

在政治理论领域，术语centralist指的是一种强调权力集中于治理机构内的意识形态。这个概念在历史上塑造了各种形式的政府，具有重要意义。centralist方法通常主张强大的国家政府应掌握大部分决策权，而不是将权力分散到地方或区域实体。这篇文章将探讨centralist治理的影响、其历史背景及其在当今政治格局中的相关性。历史上，许多国家采用centralist政策以维护统一和稳定。例如，在美国成立期间，联邦主义者倡导一种centralist框架。他们认为，强大的联邦政府对管理各州的多样利益和确保国家生存至关重要。这种观点在《联邦条款》之后尤为重要，因为它造成了一个无法解决紧迫国家问题的弱中央权威。然而，centralist模式并非没有批评者。反对者认为，将权力集中在中央权威中可能导致暴政和个人自由的侵蚀。他们倡导一种分散的方法，使地方政府拥有更大的自主权，以满足其社区的独特需求。这种centralist与分散主义意识形态之间的辩论继续成为全球政治话语的一个决定性特征。在当代政治中，气候变化、流行病和经济不平等等全球性挑战的上升促使一些人重新考虑centralist治理的优点。支持者认为，这些复杂问题需要协调响应，而只有集中权威才能有效提供。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，许多拥有centralist体系的国家能够迅速和统一地实施全国性的健康措施，可能挽救了生命。相反，大流行也突显了centralist方法的局限性。在某些情况下，中央权威难以满足地方需求，导致社区层面的挫败感和抵制。这引发了对联邦制和其他分散模型的新兴趣，这些模型赋予地方政府根据具体情况量身定制其响应的能力。在centralist与分散治理之间找到平衡是微妙的。虽然集中化可以促进高效的决策和政策实施，但也可能抑制创新和对地方问题的响应。因此，找到一种结合两种方法优势的中间道路，可能是21世纪有效治理的关键。总之，centralist治理的概念在塑造政治体系和应对社会挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。随着我们在日益互联的世界中航行，围绕centralist与分散治理的对话将保持重要性。理解这些意识形态的含义可以帮助我们创建更加有效和公平的政治结构，以满足所有公民的需求。无论一个人倾向于centralist观点还是倡导分散化，最终目标都应该是促进一个响应、负责并能够应对现代生活复杂性的政府。