cheapest

简明释义

英[tʃi:pɪst]美[ˈtʃiːpɪst]

adj. 最便宜的（cheap 的最高级形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Slow as the mail is, it is the cheapest means of communication.

尽管慢，但这是最便宜的通信方式。

2.It's the cheapest form of entertainment anyway.

无论怎么说这都是最划算的娱乐方式。

3.The report concluded (that) the cheapest option was to close the laboratory.

这份报告认为代价最低廉的选择是关闭实验室。

4.The hard drive or flash drive is the cheapest and easiest.

硬盘或闪存是最便宜和最简单的。

5.Slow as the mail is, it is the cheapest means of communication.

尽管慢，但这是最便宜的通信方式。

6.China's currency is the cheapest.

中国的货币是最便宜的。

7.Cheapest Item: 1,000 yuan (shirt).

最便宜单品：1000元(衬衫)。

8.We need to find the cheapest 最便宜的 hotel for our vacation.

我们需要找到一个最便宜的酒店来度假。

9.I want to buy the cheapest 最便宜的 phone available.

我想买一部最便宜的手机。

10.She always looks for the cheapest 最便宜的 option when shopping.

她购物时总是寻找最便宜的选择。

11.This store offers the cheapest 最便宜的 groceries in town.

这家商店提供镇上最便宜的杂货。

12.I found the cheapest 最便宜的 flight to Paris online.

我在网上找到了去巴黎的最便宜的航班。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, finding the best deals is more important than ever. Many consumers are constantly on the lookout for the *cheapest* options available, whether it be for groceries, clothing, or electronics. The desire to save money drives people to compare prices and search for discounts. However, it is crucial to understand that the *cheapest* product is not always the best choice. When shopping, one might come across several items that are labeled as the *cheapest* in their category. For instance, a pair of shoes may be priced lower than others, but this does not necessarily mean they are of good quality. Often, the *cheapest* option may lead to disappointment due to poor craftsmanship or lack of durability. As a result, consumers might end up spending more money in the long run if they have to replace the item sooner than expected.Moreover, the concept of the *cheapest* product can vary depending on the context. For example, while a fast-food meal might be the *cheapest* option for a quick lunch, it might not be the healthiest choice. In contrast, investing in a more expensive, nutritious meal can provide better health benefits and satisfaction. Therefore, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons when considering the *cheapest* alternatives.Another aspect to consider is the impact of marketing strategies on consumer perceptions of value. Retailers often advertise their products as the *cheapest* to attract buyers. However, they may use various tactics, such as reducing the size of the product or increasing the price before discounting it, which can mislead consumers. This manipulation can create a false sense of savings, making the *cheapest* option seem more appealing than it truly is.Additionally, the *cheapest* option may not always align with ethical considerations. For instance, some companies that offer the *cheapest* products may engage in unethical practices, such as exploiting workers or harming the environment. Consumers who prioritize ethical consumption may choose to pay more for products that are produced sustainably and ethically, rather than opting for the *cheapest* alternative.In conclusion, while seeking the *cheapest* options can be a smart way to save money, it is vital to approach this strategy with caution. Quality, health, ethical considerations, and long-term value should all play a role in decision-making. By being mindful of these factors, consumers can make informed choices that go beyond just finding the *cheapest* price. Ultimately, investing in quality products may lead to greater satisfaction and savings over time, proving that sometimes, the *cheapest* option is not the best option at all.

在当今快节奏的世界中，寻找最佳交易比以往任何时候都重要。许多消费者不断寻找可用的*最便宜的*选项，无论是食品杂货、服装还是电子产品。节省金钱的愿望驱使人们比较价格并寻找折扣。然而，必须理解的是，*最便宜的*产品并不总是最佳选择。购物时，人们可能会发现几件被标记为其类别中*最便宜的*商品。例如，一双鞋子的价格可能低于其他鞋子，但这并不一定意味着它们的质量很好。通常，*最便宜的*选项可能因工艺差或耐用性差而导致失望。因此，如果消费者不得不比预期更早更换物品，他们可能会最终花更多的钱。此外，*最便宜的*产品的概念可能因上下文而异。例如，虽然快餐可能是快速午餐的*最便宜的*选择，但它可能不是最健康的选择。相反，投资于更昂贵的营养餐可以提供更好的健康益处和满足感。因此，在考虑*最便宜的*替代品时，权衡利弊至关重要。另一个需要考虑的方面是营销策略对消费者价值观的影响。零售商通常将他们的产品宣传为*最便宜的*以吸引买家。然而，他们可能会使用各种策略，例如减少产品的大小或在打折前提高价格，这可能会误导消费者。这种操控可能会造成虚假的节省感，使得*最便宜的*选项看起来比实际更具吸引力。此外，*最便宜的*选项可能并不总是与伦理考量一致。例如，一些提供*最便宜的*产品的公司可能会从事不道德的做法，例如剥削工人或危害环境。优先考虑伦理消费的消费者可能会选择支付更多的钱以购买可持续和伦理生产的产品，而不是选择*最便宜的*替代品。总之，虽然寻找*最便宜的*选项可以是节省金钱的聪明方法，但以谨慎的态度看待这一策略至关重要。质量、健康、伦理考量和长期价值都应在决策中发挥作用。通过关注这些因素，消费者可以做出超越单纯寻找*最便宜的*价格的明智选择。最终，投资于优质产品可能会带来更大的满意度和长期节省，证明有时*最便宜的*选项并不是最佳选择。