partisanship

简明释义

英[ˈpɑːtɪzænʃɪp]美[ˈpɑːrtəznʃɪp]

n. 党派性；党派偏见；对党派的忠诚

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Their hypothesis is that crowd size and partisanship impose pressures on referees.

他们的假设是观众的规模和倾向性会给裁判施加压力。

2.Let's put aside the partisanship for awhile and work together for small businesses, for employees, and the communities that depend on them across this great country.

让我们暂时抛开党派，一起为小企业，为他们的雇员，为遍布这个伟大的国家的社区努力。

3.The partisanship implicit in these failures is most often excused by the originality of the author's perspective on the subject or a passionate commitment to do good.

潜伏在这些失败行为里面的偏见常常被一种观念原谅——作者对客观事物看法的初衷是怀有积极意义的。

4.Our purpose is not to enumerate the ethical failures of sports reporting, nor is it to catalog all its suspect practices of commercialism, partisanship, and covert collaboration.

我们的目的不是列举体育报道的道德缺陷，也不是列举所有可疑的商业、党派和秘密合作。

5.Against the common charge of partisanship, Mr Griffin offers what could be the slogan of the cable news industry: “We’re not trying to be all things to all pee.”

摒弃了党派之间的相互指责，格里芬先生道出了这个有线电视新闻产业共同的标语：“我们目的不是为了迎合所有人。”

6.The negative one was that they would elevate the moral tone and end bitter partisanship in Washington.

消极的论点是提高道德水准，结束华盛顿激烈的两党之争。

7.Efforts to reduce partisanship 党派之争 have been met with resistance from both sides.

减少党派之争的努力遭到了双方的抵制。

8.In a time of high partisanship 党派之争, finding common ground is essential for progress.

在高度的党派之争时期，找到共同点对于进步至关重要。

9.Many voters are frustrated by the partisanship 党派之争 that prevents meaningful dialogue.

许多选民对阻碍有意义对话的党派之争感到沮丧。

10.The news coverage often reflects the partisanship 党派之争 of the media outlets themselves.

新闻报道往往反映了媒体自身的党派之争。

11.The recent election highlighted the deepening partisanship 党派之争 in our political system.

最近的选举突显了我们政治体系中日益加深的党派之争。

作文

Partisanship is a term that describes the strong allegiance to a particular political party or ideology, often leading to a lack of cooperation with those outside one's own group. In recent years, the level of partisanship has escalated dramatically in many countries, particularly in the United States. This phenomenon can be observed in various aspects of politics, from legislative processes to public discourse. The consequences of heightened partisanship are profound and far-reaching, affecting not only governance but also the social fabric of society.One of the most evident impacts of partisanship is the polarization of political opinions. When individuals identify strongly with their political party, they may become less open to alternative viewpoints. This is exacerbated by social media, where algorithms often promote content that aligns with users' existing beliefs, creating echo chambers. As a result, discussions around important issues such as healthcare, education, and climate change become increasingly contentious, with little room for compromise or understanding.Moreover, the rise of partisanship has led to gridlock in legislative bodies. When lawmakers prioritize party loyalty over the common good, it becomes challenging to pass essential legislation. For instance, budget negotiations can stall for months as parties refuse to budge on key issues. This not only frustrates constituents but also undermines the effectiveness of government. Citizens expect their representatives to work together for the benefit of all, but excessive partisanship often leads to disappointment and disillusionment with the political process.Another critical aspect of partisanship is its influence on voter behavior. Many voters align themselves with a party based on identity rather than policy. This alignment can lead to a lack of informed decision-making, as individuals may vote for candidates solely because they belong to the same party, regardless of their qualifications or stances on issues. This phenomenon can perpetuate a cycle of partisanship, as elected officials feel pressured to adhere strictly to party lines to maintain support.The implications of partisanship extend beyond politics into everyday life. Friendships and family relationships can become strained when differing political views emerge. People may find themselves avoiding discussions about politics altogether, fearing conflict or alienation. This social fragmentation can diminish community cohesion and foster an environment of mistrust and hostility.To combat the negative effects of partisanship, it is crucial to promote dialogue and understanding across party lines. Initiatives that encourage bipartisan cooperation can help bridge divides and foster a sense of shared purpose. Additionally, educating citizens about the importance of critical thinking and open-mindedness can empower them to engage with diverse perspectives.In conclusion, partisanship poses significant challenges to modern governance and societal harmony. Its detrimental effects, including political polarization, legislative gridlock, and social discord, call for urgent attention. By fostering a culture of collaboration and understanding, we can work towards a more unified and effective political landscape. Addressing the roots of partisanship will ultimately lead to a healthier democracy and a more cohesive society.

党派主义是一个描述对特定政治党派或意识形态强烈忠诚的术语，通常导致与自己群体之外的人缺乏合作。近年来，在许多国家，尤其是美国，党派主义的程度急剧上升。这种现象可以在政治的各个方面观察到，从立法过程到公共话语。高度的党派主义的后果深远而广泛，影响不仅是治理，还有社会的结构。党派主义最明显的影响之一是政治意见的两极化。当个人强烈认同自己的政党时，他们可能会变得不太愿意接受其他观点。这种情况因社交媒体而加剧，算法往往会推广与用户现有信念一致的内容，形成回音室。因此，围绕医疗保健、教育和气候变化等重要问题的讨论变得越来越 contentious，几乎没有妥协或理解的空间。此外，党派主义的上升导致立法机构的僵局。当立法者优先考虑党派忠诚而非公共利益时，推动重要立法变得困难。例如，预算谈判可能会拖延数月，因为各党拒绝在关键问题上让步。这不仅使选民感到沮丧，还削弱了政府的有效性。公民希望他们的代表为所有人共同努力，但过度的党派主义往往导致对政治过程的失望和幻灭。党派主义的另一个关键方面是其对选民行为的影响。许多选民基于身份而非政策与某个政党保持一致。这种一致性可能导致缺乏知情决策，因为个人可能仅仅因为候选人属于同一政党而投票，而不管他们的资格或对问题的立场。这种现象可能会延续党派主义的循环，因为当选官员感受到严格遵循党派路线的压力时。党派主义的影响超越了政治，渗透到日常生活中。当不同的政治观点出现时，友谊和家庭关系可能会变得紧张。人们可能发现自己完全避免谈论政治，担心冲突或被孤立。这种社会的分裂可能会削弱社区的凝聚力，并培养一种不信任和敌意的环境。为了应对党派主义的负面影响，促进跨党派的对话和理解至关重要。鼓励两党合作的倡议可以帮助弥合分歧，培养共同目标的感觉。此外，教育公民关于批判性思维和开放心态的重要性，可以使他们能够与不同的观点进行互动。总之，党派主义对现代治理和社会和谐构成重大挑战。其有害影响，包括政治两极化、立法僵局和社会分裂，呼唤紧急关注。通过培养合作和理解的文化，我们可以朝着更统一和有效的政治格局迈进。解决党派主义的根源最终将导致一个更健康的民主和一个更加团结的社会。