privity

简明释义

英[ˈprɪvəti]美[prɪvəti]

n. 私下知悉；共同利益关系

复 数 p r i v i t i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Exchanging visits is virtue, support is friendship, resonating is privity!

互访是美德，支持是友情，共鸣是默契！

2.Somehow, Walmart and Carrefour try not to conflict with each other's store globally, but in China, the privity has been broken.

不知有意还是无意，沃尔玛和家乐福在全球布局上都尽量避免着直接冲突。但当两家在中国市场遭遇的时候，这一“默契”被彻底打破。

3.I believe that this is our luck and privity!

我相信这是我们的缘分，我们的默契！

4.A plaintiff was not required to be in direct privity with the defendant bring an action.

原告与被告间是否存在直接利益关系不是原告提起侵权诉讼的必要条件。

5.After the argumentation of jurisprudence authority of the doctrine of privity of contract, the text gives the wide coverage to probes into the exception to privity of contract.

本文在对合同相对性理论的法理依据进行论证之后，用相对当的篇幅探讨了合同相对性的例外现象。

6.The principle of privity of contract will, inevitably cause the parochialism of contract law.

合同相对性原则削足适履的做法，会不可避免地造成契约法的封闭化。

7.The emergence and reconstruction of Chongqing's literary image and its superposition and distance with the city show the relationship of privity and rejection between men and the city in the wartime.

重庆文学形象的浮现和再构，和城市本身的重合和距离，则体现了战时人和城市之间默契和拒绝的关系。

8.As the regulation and the system of contract, the privity of contract have been recognized and respected widely as the fundamental principle in common law and continental law.

合同相对性原则作为合同规则和制度的奠基石，在大陆法系和英美法系均得到普遍遵守。

9.In legal disputes, the concept of privity 私密关系 often determines who can sue for breach of contract.

在法律争议中，私密关系的概念通常决定了谁可以因违反合同而提起诉讼。

10.Without privity 私密关系, a party may not have the right to enforce the terms of the agreement.

没有私密关系，一方可能没有权利强制执行协议的条款。

11.The contract was only binding between the parties involved, as there was no privity 私密关系 with third parties.

该合同仅对参与方具有约束力，因为与第三方没有私密关系。

12.The court ruled that there was no privity 私密关系 between the buyer and the supplier.

法院裁定买方与供应商之间没有私密关系。

13.The doctrine of privity 私密关系 limits the ability of outsiders to claim benefits from a contract.

私密关系原则限制了外部人员从合同中索取利益的能力。

作文

In the realm of contract law, the concept of privity is fundamental to understanding the relationships between parties involved in an agreement. Privity refers to the direct relationship that exists between two parties who have entered into a contract. This legal doctrine dictates that only those who are parties to the contract have the rights and obligations outlined within it. For instance, if a homeowner hires a contractor to renovate their kitchen, there is a privity of contract between the homeowner and the contractor. The homeowner can enforce the terms of the contract against the contractor, and vice versa. However, a third party, such as a neighbor who may be affected by the renovation, does not have any rights under this contract due to the lack of privity. The significance of privity extends beyond mere contractual relationships; it also plays a crucial role in determining liability. In tort law, the absence of privity can limit a party's ability to seek damages for negligence. For example, if a manufacturer produces a faulty product that injures a consumer, the consumer might not have a direct contract with the manufacturer, thus lacking privity. Traditionally, this meant that the consumer could not sue the manufacturer for damages. However, modern legal frameworks have evolved to allow for some exceptions to this rule, recognizing the need to protect consumers even in the absence of privity. Moreover, the principle of privity has implications for the enforceability of contracts. In many jurisdictions, the doctrine of privity prevents third parties from enforcing the terms of a contract unless they fall under specific exceptions, such as those outlined in third-party beneficiary statutes. This means that while a contract may benefit someone who is not a party to it, that individual generally cannot claim any rights unless the contract explicitly states otherwise. This limitation can sometimes lead to unfair situations where individuals or entities that are clearly intended to benefit from a contract find themselves without legal recourse. As a result, some legal systems have developed doctrines that allow for certain third parties to enforce contracts when it is clear that the contracting parties intended to confer a benefit upon them. These exceptions highlight the evolving nature of privity in contract law and the ongoing debate about its relevance in modern commerce. In conclusion, understanding privity is essential for anyone engaged in contractual agreements, whether as a business owner, consumer, or legal professional. It defines the boundaries of rights and obligations within contracts and impacts the ability to seek remedies in cases of breach or negligence. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, so too will the interpretation and application of privity, reflecting the changing dynamics of relationships in both personal and commercial contexts. Recognizing the importance of privity allows individuals to navigate their legal rights more effectively and ensures that they are aware of the limitations that may arise when dealing with contracts.

在合同法领域，privity的概念对于理解参与协议的各方之间的关系至关重要。Privity指的是两个当事人之间存在的直接关系，他们已经签订了合同。这一法律原则规定，只有合同的当事人才拥有合同中列出的权利和义务。例如，如果一个房主聘请承包商来翻新他们的厨房，那么房主和承包商之间就存在privity的合同关系。房主可以对承包商执行合同条款，反之亦然。然而，像邻居这样的第三方，虽然可能受到翻新工程的影响，但由于缺乏privity，他们在这个合同下没有任何权利。Privity的重要性不仅仅局限于合同关系，它在确定责任时也发挥着关键作用。在侵权法中，缺乏privity可能限制一方寻求因过失造成的损害赔偿的能力。例如，如果制造商生产了有缺陷的产品并导致消费者受伤，消费者可能与制造商之间没有直接的合同，因此缺乏privity。传统上，这意味着消费者无法向制造商索赔。然而，现代法律框架已经发展出一些例外规则，承认即使在缺乏privity的情况下，也需要保护消费者。此外，privity原则还对合同的可执行性产生影响。在许多法域中，privity原则阻止第三方在没有特定例外的情况下执行合同条款，例如在第三方受益者法规中列出的那些例外。这意味着，尽管合同可能使非当事人受益，但除非合同明确说明，否则该个人通常不能主张任何权利。这种限制有时会导致不公平的情况，在这些情况下，明显打算从合同中受益的个人或实体发现自己没有法律救济。因此，一些法律体系发展出允许某些第三方在明显表明合同当事人打算给予他们利益时执行合同的原则。这些例外突显了合同法中privity的不断演变以及关于其在现代商业中相关性的持续辩论。总之，理解privity对于任何参与合同协议的人来说都是必不可少的，无论是企业主、消费者还是法律专业人士。它定义了合同中的权利和义务的边界，并影响在违约或过失情况下寻求救济的能力。随着法律环境的不断演变，privity的解释和应用也将不断发展，反映出个人和商业环境中关系的变化动态。认识到privity的重要性使个人能够更有效地处理自己的法律权利，并确保他们意识到在处理合同时可能出现的限制。