tautologizing

简明释义

英[tɔːˈtɒlədʒaɪz]美[tɔˈtɑləˌdʒaɪz]

vi. 重复使用同义字；赘述

第 三 人 称 单 数 t a u t o l o g i z e s

现 在 分 词 t a u t o l o g i z i n g

过 去 式 t a u t o l o g i z e d

过 去 分 词 t a u t o l o g i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In academic writing, tautologizing 重复表述 can weaken your argument.

在学术写作中，tautologizing 重复表述可能会削弱你的论点。

2.In his speech, he kept tautologizing 重复表述 the same point without adding any new information.

在他的演讲中，他不断tautologizing 重复表述同一个观点，没有增加任何新信息。

3.The report was criticized for tautologizing 重复表述 key findings, making it less impactful.

该报告因tautologizing 重复表述关键发现而受到批评，使其影响力降低。

4.His tendency to tautologize 重复表述 made the conversation feel redundant.

他倾向于tautologize 重复表述使对话显得多余。

5.Avoid tautologizing 重复表述 in your writing to keep it concise and clear.

在写作中避免tautologizing 重复表述，以保持简洁明了。

作文

In the world of language and communication, clarity is paramount. However, as we delve into the intricacies of rhetoric and discourse, we often encounter the phenomenon known as tautologizing. This term refers to the unnecessary repetition of an idea or concept, often using different words that convey the same meaning. While it may seem harmless or even stylistically appealing at times, tautologizing can lead to confusion and ambiguity in communication. For instance, consider the phrase "free gift." The word 'gift' inherently implies that it is free; therefore, the addition of the adjective 'free' is redundant. Such expressions not only clutter our language but also dilute the impact of our messages. When we engage in tautologizing, we risk losing the attention of our audience, as they may become frustrated with the lack of precision in our words.Moreover, tautologizing is prevalent in various forms of writing, including academic papers, speeches, and everyday conversations. In academic writing, for example, a scholar might state, "The reason why this study is important is due to the fact that it provides valuable insights." Here, the phrase 'the reason why' could be simplified to 'this study is important because it provides valuable insights.' By eliminating tautologizing, the writer enhances the clarity and conciseness of their argument.In speeches, politicians often fall into the trap of tautologizing as they attempt to emphasize their points. Phrases like "I personally believe" are redundant, as the act of stating a belief already implies a personal connection. Instead, simply saying "I believe" would suffice and convey the message more effectively. This practice can diminish the speaker's credibility, as audiences may perceive them as lacking confidence in their statements.On a broader scale, tautologizing can also affect how we process information. When we encounter repetitive phrases, our brains may struggle to differentiate between key ideas and filler content. This can lead to cognitive overload, making it difficult for listeners or readers to retain important information. As communicators, it is our responsibility to present our ideas in a clear and engaging manner, avoiding unnecessary repetition that could hinder understanding.To combat tautologizing, one effective strategy is to revise our writing and speech for redundancy. By critically evaluating our language choices, we can identify and eliminate phrases that do not add value to our communication. Additionally, seeking feedback from peers can provide fresh perspectives and help us recognize patterns of tautologizing that we may overlook.In conclusion, while tautologizing may seem like a minor issue, its implications for effective communication are significant. By striving for clarity and precision in our language, we can enhance our ability to convey ideas and connect with our audience. Ultimately, avoiding tautologizing allows us to communicate more effectively, fostering understanding and engagement in our conversations and writings.

在语言和交流的世界中，清晰性至关重要。然而，当我们深入探讨修辞和话语的复杂性时，常常会遇到一种现象，称为同义反复。这个术语指的是对一个想法或概念的不必要重复，通常使用不同的词语来表达相同的意思。虽然有时这似乎无害甚至具有某种风格吸引力，但同义反复可能导致沟通中的混淆和模糊。例如，考虑短语“免费礼物”。“礼物”这个词本身就意味着它是免费的；因此，形容词“免费”的添加是多余的。这种表达不仅使我们的语言变得冗杂，而且还稀释了我们信息的影响力。当我们参与同义反复时，我们冒着失去观众注意力的风险，因为他们可能会因我们言辞的不精确而感到沮丧。此外，同义反复在各种写作形式中普遍存在，包括学术论文、演讲和日常对话。例如，在学术写作中，学者可能会说：“这项研究之所以重要，是因为它提供了宝贵的见解。”在这里，“之所以”这个短语可以简化为“这项研究重要，因为它提供了宝贵的见解”。通过消除同义反复，作者增强了论点的清晰性和简洁性。在演讲中，政治家们经常陷入同义反复的陷阱，因为他们试图强调自己的观点。像“我个人认为”这样的短语是多余的，因为陈述信念的行为本身就暗示了个人的联系。相反，简单地说“我认为”就足够了，并且更有效地传达了信息。这种做法可能会削弱演讲者的可信度，因为观众可能会认为他们对自己的陈述缺乏信心。从更广泛的角度来看，同义反复也会影响我们处理信息的方式。当我们遇到重复的短语时，我们的大脑可能会难以区分关键思想和填充内容。这可能导致认知过载，使听众或读者难以保留重要信息。作为沟通者，我们有责任以清晰和吸引人的方式呈现我们的想法，避免不必要的重复，这可能会妨碍理解。为了抵制同义反复，一个有效的策略是修订我们的写作和演讲，以消除冗余。通过批判性地评估我们的语言选择，我们可以识别并消除那些没有为我们的沟通增值的短语。此外，寻求同行的反馈可以提供新的视角，帮助我们识别我们可能忽视的同义反复模式。总之，虽然同义反复看似是一个小问题，但它对有效沟通的影响却是显著的。通过追求我们语言的清晰性和精确性，我们可以增强传达思想和与观众建立联系的能力。最终，避免同义反复使我们能够更有效地沟通，促进我们对话和写作中的理解和参与。