refutability

简明释义

英[ˌrefjʊtəˈbɪlətɪ]美[rɪˌfjʊtəˈbɪləti]

n. 可反驳性

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.An XML signature generated from the private key of the sender and affixed to the XML ensures the non-refutability of the sender.

由发送者的私钥生成的附在xml上的XML签名保证了发送者的不可驳性。

2.An XML signature generated from the private key of the sender and affixed to the XML ensures the non-refutability of the sender.

由发送者的私钥生成的附在xml上的XML签名保证了发送者的不可驳性。

3.The scientific method is built on the principle of refutability, which means that a hypothesis must be testable and capable of being proven false.

科学方法建立在可反驳性的原则上，这意味着一个假设必须是可测试的，并且能够被证明是错误的。

4.The refutability of claims made by proponents of alternative medicine is often questioned by the scientific community.

替代医学倡导者所提出的主张的可反驳性常常受到科学界的质疑。

5.A good scientific theory should possess refutability to ensure that it can withstand scrutiny.

一个好的科学理论应该具备可反驳性，以确保它能够经受住审查。

6.Karl Popper emphasized the importance of refutability in distinguishing scientific theories from non-scientific ones.

卡尔·波普尔强调了可反驳性在区分科学理论与非科学理论中的重要性。

7.In philosophy, the refutability of a theory is crucial for its acceptance in the academic community.

在哲学中，一个理论的可反驳性对于其在学术界的接受至关重要。

作文

In the realm of scientific inquiry, one crucial concept that often surfaces is the idea of refutability. This term refers to the ability of a hypothesis or theory to be proven false through observation or experimentation. The importance of refutability cannot be overstated, as it serves as a foundational principle in the scientific method. A claim that cannot be tested or potentially disproven falls outside the boundaries of scientific investigation. For instance, if a scientist proposes that a particular substance has healing properties, this claim must be refutable through rigorous testing and analysis. If there are no conditions under which the claim could be shown to be false, it lacks scientific merit.The philosopher Karl Popper famously emphasized the significance of refutability in his discussions about demarcation—the process of distinguishing between science and non-science. According to Popper, a theory should be considered scientific only if it is refutable. This perspective challenges scientists and researchers to formulate hypotheses that can withstand scrutiny and potential falsification. For example, the theory of gravity is refutable because it can be tested in various scenarios; if an object were to float indefinitely without any force acting upon it, the theory would need to be revised.Moreover, the concept of refutability extends beyond the natural sciences into social sciences and humanities. In political science, for instance, theories about human behavior or societal trends must also possess refutability. If a political theory claims that economic prosperity leads to increased happiness, it should be possible to find data or case studies that contradict this assertion. The ability to challenge and potentially disprove a theory fosters a more robust understanding of complex issues.However, the notion of refutability is not without its challenges. Some critics argue that certain theories, particularly in fields like psychology or sociology, may be difficult to refute due to the complexity of human behavior and the multitude of influencing factors. This raises the question of how we can effectively apply the principle of refutability in such contexts. It suggests that while refutability is a vital aspect of scientific inquiry, researchers must also be adaptable in their approaches, finding ways to test their theories even when direct refutation seems elusive.In conclusion, refutability plays a pivotal role in the advancement of knowledge across various disciplines. It ensures that theories are not merely accepted on faith but are subjected to critical examination and testing. By embracing the principle of refutability, we cultivate a culture of inquiry that values evidence and skepticism, ultimately leading to a deeper understanding of the world around us. As we continue to explore new ideas and concepts, let us remember the importance of crafting hypotheses that can be challenged and tested, thereby contributing to the ongoing dialogue of knowledge and discovery.

在科学研究的领域中，一个经常出现的重要概念是可反驳性。这个术语指的是假设或理论通过观察或实验被证明为假的能力。可反驳性的重要性不容小觑，因为它作为科学方法的基础原则。一个无法被测试或潜在地被推翻的主张超出了科学调查的范围。例如，如果一位科学家提出某种物质具有治疗特性，这一主张必须通过严格的测试和分析来进行反驳。如果没有任何条件可以显示该主张是错误的，那么它就缺乏科学价值。哲学家卡尔·波普尔在讨论划分科学与非科学时，强调了可反驳性的重要性。根据波普尔的观点，只有当一个理论是可反驳的时，它才应被视为科学。这一观点挑战科学家和研究人员制定能够经受审查和潜在伪证的假设。例如，重力理论是可反驳的，因为它可以在各种情境中进行测试；如果一个物体在没有任何力量作用下无限期悬浮，该理论将需要修正。此外，可反驳性的概念不仅限于自然科学，还扩展到社会科学和人文学科。在政治学中，例如，有关人类行为或社会趋势的理论也必须具有可反驳性。如果一个政治理论声称经济繁荣会导致幸福感增加，那么应该可以找到数据或案例研究来反驳这一主张。挑战并可能推翻一个理论的能力促进了对复杂问题更为扎实的理解。然而，可反驳性的概念并非没有挑战。一些批评者认为，尤其是在心理学或社会学等领域，某些理论可能由于人类行为的复杂性和多种影响因素而难以反驳。这引发了我们如何有效地在此类背景下应用可反驳性原则的问题。这表明，尽管可反驳性是科学探究的重要方面，但研究人员在其方法上也必须灵活，寻找即使在直接反驳似乎难以实现的情况下也能测试其理论的方法。总之，可反驳性在各个学科知识的进步中发挥着关键作用。它确保理论不是仅凭信仰被接受，而是经过严谨的审查和测试。通过拥抱可反驳性原则，我们培养了一种重视证据和怀疑精神的探究文化，从而最终加深了对周围世界的理解。随着我们继续探索新的思想和概念，让我们铭记制定可以被挑战和测试的假设的重要性，从而为知识和发现的持续对话做出贡献。