reviewers

简明释义

[rɪˈvjuːəz][rɪˈvjuˌɚz]

n. 评论者(reviewer 的复数);评审员

英英释义

Individuals who evaluate or assess something, such as a product, service, or piece of work, often providing feedback and opinions.

评估或评价某物(如产品、服务或作品)的人,通常提供反馈和意见。

单词用法

peer reviewers

同行评审者

anonymous reviewers

匿名审稿人

review process

审稿过程

reviewers' comments

审稿人的评论

feedback from reviewers

来自审稿人的反馈

select reviewers

选择审稿人

同义词

critics

评论家

The critics praised the film for its innovative storytelling.

评论家对这部电影的创新叙事给予了赞扬。

evaluators

评估者

Evaluators will assess the program's effectiveness based on various criteria.

评估者将根据各种标准评估该项目的有效性。

assessors

评审者

The assessors provided valuable feedback on the project proposal.

评审者对项目提案提供了宝贵的反馈。

judges

裁判

Judges will determine the winner of the competition after careful consideration.

裁判将在仔细考虑后决定比赛的获胜者。

analysts

分析师

Analysts have conducted a thorough review of the market trends.

分析师对市场趋势进行了全面审查。

反义词

creators

创作者

The creators of the film received high praise for their innovative ideas.

电影的创作者因其创新的想法而受到高度赞扬。

producers

制作人

The producers worked hard to ensure the project was completed on time.

制作人努力确保项目按时完成。

例句

1.Many reviewers were bored by "My Life.

许多评论家都觉得《我的生活》非常无聊。

2.Many reviewers were bored by "My Life."

许多评论家都觉得《我的生活》非常无聊。

3.Feedback from reviewers has been taken into account.

来自审核人员的反馈也应该考虑。

4.This list is designed to help reviewers detect defects.

该列表用于帮助检查员检查缺陷。

5.Designers can also see feedback from many reviewers concurrently.

设计人员还能够同时查看多位审核人员的反馈。

6.Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal's internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.

稿件将被标记为需要由期刊的内部编辑、现有的评审编辑委员会或外部同行评审员进行额外审查。

7.Also a reviewer doesn't depend on the results of the other reviewers.

另外,审阅人员并不依赖其他审阅人员的审阅结果。

8.Car and film reviewers have gone.

汽车和电影评论员都离开了。

9.The reviewers 审查者 at the conference provided valuable feedback on the research paper.

会议上的审查者 reviewers 对研究论文提供了宝贵的反馈。

10.The product received mixed reviews from reviewers 评论员 online, with some praising its features and others criticizing its price.

该产品在网上收到了来自评论员 reviewers 的褒贬不一的评价,有些人称赞其功能,而另一些人则批评其价格。

11.Before publishing, the journal sends articles to several reviewers 评审人 for peer review.

在出版之前,期刊会将文章发送给几位评审人 reviewers 进行同行评审。

12.Many reviewers 评论者 noted the film's stunning visuals and compelling performances.

许多评论者 reviewers 指出这部电影的视觉效果惊艳,表演引人入胜。

13.The book was well-received by the reviewers 评论家, who praised its unique storytelling.

这本书得到了评论家 reviewers 的好评,他们赞扬了它独特的叙事风格。

作文

In the world of literature and media, the role of reviewers (评论者) is essential for guiding audiences toward quality content. These individuals dedicate their time to analyzing and critiquing various forms of creative work, including books, movies, music, and even video games. Their insights not only help consumers make informed choices but also provide valuable feedback to creators, fostering a culture of improvement and innovation.One of the primary responsibilities of reviewers (评论者) is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a piece of work. For instance, a book reviewer (评论者) may assess the plot development, character depth, and writing style, while a film reviewer (评论者) might focus on cinematography, direction, and acting performances. By highlighting these aspects, reviewers (评论者) offer a comprehensive understanding of the work, allowing potential readers or viewers to gauge whether it aligns with their preferences.Moreover, reviewers (评论者) often serve as a bridge between the audience and the creator. Their critiques can influence public perception and reception of a work. A positive review (评论) from a reputable reviewer (评论者) can propel a book to bestseller status or make a film a box office hit. Conversely, a negative critique can deter audiences and impact sales significantly. This power highlights the responsibility that comes with being a reviewer (评论者); they must strive for objectivity and fairness in their assessments.In recent years, the rise of social media and online platforms has transformed the landscape for reviewers (评论者). Traditional print media are no longer the only avenues for critiques. Now, anyone with an internet connection can share their thoughts on a movie or a book through blogs, vlogs, and social media posts. While this democratization of reviewing (评论) allows for diverse opinions, it also raises concerns about the credibility and expertise of some reviewers (评论者). Audiences must navigate this vast sea of information, discerning which voices to trust.Despite these challenges, the core function of reviewers (评论者) remains unchanged: to guide and inform. Many established reviewers (评论者) have built reputations based on their knowledge and experience, making them reliable sources for recommendations. They often provide context and background information that enrich the audience's understanding of the work, enhancing the overall experience.Additionally, reviewers (评论者) contribute to the discourse surrounding art and culture. Through their critiques, they spark conversations about themes, societal issues, and artistic choices that resonate with audiences. This dialogue is vital for cultural growth, as it encourages both creators and consumers to reflect on the impact of their work and its relevance in society.In conclusion, reviewers (评论者) play a crucial role in the ecosystem of literature and media. They not only help audiences navigate their choices but also foster a culture of dialogue and improvement within the creative community. As the landscape of reviewing (评论) continues to evolve, the importance of thoughtful and responsible reviewers (评论者) will remain paramount, ensuring that quality art and media thrive in our society.

在文学和媒体的世界中,评论者reviewers)的角色对于指导观众选择优质内容至关重要。这些人致力于分析和批评各种形式的创作作品,包括书籍、电影、音乐甚至视频游戏。他们的见解不仅帮助消费者做出明智的选择,还为创作者提供了宝贵的反馈,促进了改进和创新的文化。评论者reviewers)的主要职责之一是评估作品的优缺点。例如,一位书籍评论者(reviewer)可能会评估情节发展、角色深度和写作风格,而一位电影评论者(reviewer)则可能专注于摄影、导演和表演。通过突出这些方面,评论者reviewers)提供了对作品的全面理解,使潜在的读者或观众能够判断它是否符合他们的偏好。此外,评论者reviewers)通常充当观众与创作者之间的桥梁。他们的批评可以影响公众对作品的看法和接受度。一位知名评论者(reviewer)的积极评价可以使一本书跃升为畅销书,或使一部电影成为票房热门。相反,消极的批评可能会阻止观众观看,并显著影响销售。这种权力突显了作为评论者reviewers)所承担的责任;他们必须在评估中追求客观和公正。近年来,社交媒体和在线平台的兴起改变了评论者reviewers)的格局。传统的印刷媒体不再是唯一的批评渠道。现在,任何有互联网连接的人都可以通过博客、视频博客和社交媒体帖子分享他们对电影或书籍的看法。虽然这种评论(reviewing)的民主化允许多样化的观点,但也引发了对一些评论者reviewers)可信度和专业性的担忧。观众必须在这片信息的海洋中航行,辨别哪些声音值得信赖。尽管面临这些挑战,评论者reviewers)的核心职能保持不变:指导和告知。许多资深的评论者reviewers)凭借其知识和经验建立了声誉,使他们成为可靠的推荐来源。他们通常提供背景信息和上下文,丰富观众对作品的理解,提升整体体验。此外,评论者reviewers)还为艺术和文化的讨论做出贡献。通过他们的批评,他们激发了关于主题、社会问题和艺术选择的对话,这些都与观众产生共鸣。这种对话对于文化的成长至关重要,因为它鼓励创作者和消费者反思他们的作品及其在社会中的相关性。总之,评论者reviewers)在文学和媒体生态系统中扮演着至关重要的角色。他们不仅帮助观众导航选择,还促进了创意社区内对话和改进的文化。随着评论(reviewing)格局的不断演变,深思熟虑和负责任的评论者reviewers)的重要性将始终存在,确保优质的艺术和媒体在我们的社会中蓬勃发展。