confiscatory

简明释义

英[kənˈfɪskətəri]美[kənˈfɪskəˌtɔːri]

adj. 充公的；没收的；征用的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Contested issues have included supposedly confiscatory taxes, a law that threatens media freedom and central-bank independence.

极具争议性的议题可能包括一项关于税收将被充公的法律，此法会危及媒体自由和中央银行独立性的法律。

2.One hedge-fund manager who, before the election, was terrified Mr. Obama would usher in “confiscatory” tax policies breathed a sigh of relief.

大选之前,某对冲基金经理曾担心奥巴马会开创”充公性”的税收政策,如今,他长舒了一口气.

3.I got many responses from readers, with a common theme being that this was silly, that even confiscatory taxes on the wealthy couldn't possibly raise enough money to matter.

文章得到许多读者的响应，有一个共同的主题，即认为这种做法属于愚蠢之举，对富人甚至征收充公般的税收也不可能筹集有足够分量的金钱。

4.In its ruling, the council said that its rejection was made without examining "other grievances" against the tax, such as its possible "confiscatory character".

委员会说道在裁定拒绝这个方案时，没有衡量其他违背税收的因素，比如税收可能有充公的因素。

5.I got many responses from readers, with a common theme being that this was silly, that even confiscatory taxes on the wealthy couldn't possibly raise enough money to matter.

文章得到许多读者的响应，有一个共同的主题，即认为这种做法属于愚蠢之举，对富人甚至征收充公般的税收也不可能筹集有足够分量的金钱。

6.The government implemented a confiscatory policy to seize assets from those involved in illegal activities.

政府实施了一项没收性的政策，以没收那些参与非法活动的人的资产。

7.In times of crisis, governments may resort to confiscatory actions to stabilize the economy.

在危机时期，政府可能会采取没收性行动来稳定经济。

8.The new tax law was criticized for being too confiscatory, burdening the middle class.

新税法因过于没收性而受到批评，给中产阶级带来了负担。

9.The confiscatory nature of the law raised concerns about property rights.

法律的没收性特征引发了对财产权的担忧。

10.Many citizens protested against the confiscatory measures that were seen as unfair and excessive.

许多公民抗议这些被视为不公正和过度的没收性措施。

作文

In modern societies, the concept of taxation often stirs up intense debates among citizens and policymakers alike. One term that frequently comes into play in these discussions is confiscatory. This adjective describes actions or policies that involve seizing property or wealth, typically by a government, in a manner that is deemed excessive or unjust. The implications of confiscatory measures can be profound, affecting not only individual livelihoods but also the broader economic landscape.When a government implements confiscatory tax policies, it often aims to redistribute wealth in order to address social inequalities. For instance, progressive taxation, where higher income earners pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes, can be seen as a response to the growing gap between the rich and the poor. However, critics argue that when these taxes become too high, they can be labeled as confiscatory, leading to disincentives for hard work and innovation. The concern is that if individuals feel that their earnings will be excessively taxed, they may be less motivated to pursue ambitious projects or entrepreneurial ventures.Moreover, the term confiscatory can also apply to government policies that seize property under the guise of public interest. For example, eminent domain laws allow governments to take private land for public use, such as building roads or schools. While this can be justified in certain circumstances, if the compensation offered to property owners is inadequate, the action may be perceived as confiscatory. This perception can lead to public outcry and legal battles, as individuals fight to protect their rights and property.The debate over confiscatory taxation and policies often centers on the balance between the need for government revenue and the protection of individual rights. Proponents of higher taxes argue that they are essential for funding public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which ultimately benefit society as a whole. They contend that without sufficient funding, these vital services would deteriorate, leading to a decline in quality of life.On the other hand, opponents of confiscatory measures stress the importance of personal freedom and economic autonomy. They believe that individuals should have the right to keep what they earn and that excessive taxation undermines the principles of capitalism and personal responsibility. This tension between collective welfare and individual rights is at the heart of many political ideologies and shapes the policies of various governments around the world.In conclusion, the term confiscatory encapsulates a contentious issue that resonates deeply within society. Whether through taxation or property seizure, the implications of confiscatory actions can have lasting effects on individuals and communities. As societies continue to grapple with issues of wealth distribution and government intervention, understanding the nuances of confiscatory policies will be essential for fostering informed discussions about the role of government in our lives. Ultimately, finding a fair balance between the needs of society and the rights of individuals remains a complex challenge that requires careful consideration and ongoing dialogue.

在现代社会，税收的概念常常在公民和政策制定者之间引发激烈的辩论。一个经常在这些讨论中出现的术语是没收性的。这个形容词描述了政府以过度或不公正的方式没收财产或财富的行为或政策。没收性的措施的影响可能是深远的，不仅影响个人生计，还影响更广泛的经济格局。当政府实施没收性的税收政策时，通常旨在通过重新分配财富来解决社会不平等问题。例如，累进税制，即高收入者支付更高比例的税款，可以被视为对日益增长的贫富差距的回应。然而，批评者认为，当这些税收变得过高时，它们可能被标记为没收性的，从而导致人们缺乏努力工作和创新的动力。人们担心，如果个人觉得他们的收入将被过度征税，他们可能会对追求雄心勃勃的项目或创业活动失去动力。此外，术语没收性的也可以适用于政府在公共利益的名义下没收财产的政策。例如，土地征用法允许政府为了公共用途（例如修建道路或学校）而征用私人土地。虽然在某些情况下可以合理化这种做法，但如果给予财产所有者的补偿不足，这一行为可能会被视为没收性的。这种看法可能导致公众抗议和法律斗争，因为个人争取保护自己的权利和财产。关于没收性税收和政策的辩论通常集中在政府收入需求与个人权利保护之间的平衡上。支持提高税收的人认为，这对于资助教育、医疗和基础设施等公共服务至关重要，而这些服务最终惠及整个社会。他们主张，如果没有足够的资金，这些重要服务将恶化，导致生活质量下降。另一方面，反对没收性的措施的人强调个人自由和经济自主的重要性。他们认为，个人应该有权保留自己所赚取的财富，过度征税破坏了资本主义和个人责任的原则。这种集体福利与个人权利之间的紧张关系是许多政治意识形态的核心，并塑造了世界各国政府的政策。总之，术语没收性的概括了一个在社会中引起深刻共鸣的争议问题。无论是通过税收还是财产征收，没收性的行动的影响都可能对个人和社区产生持久的影响。随着社会继续努力解决财富分配和政府干预的问题，理解没收性的政策的细微差别对于促进有关政府在我们生活中角色的知情讨论至关重要。最终，在社会需求与个人权利之间找到公平的平衡仍然是一个复杂的挑战，需要仔细考虑和持续对话。