lobotomized

简明释义

英[ləˈbɒtəmaɪzd]美[ləˈbɑːtəmaɪzd]

adj. 行尸走肉般的

v. 为……施行脑叶切开术；使迟钝（lobotomize 的过去式和过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Do you want to be lobotomized where that's the only way, at least that we've got so far, to imagine a life that you would enjoy forever.

你们想接受额叶切除术吗,至少那是我们想到的唯一办法，去想象一种永远享受的生活。

2.Do you want to be lobotomized where that's the only way, at least that we've got so far, to imagine a life that you would enjoy forever.

你们想接受额叶切除术吗,至少那是我们想到的唯一办法，去想象一种永远享受的生活。

3.After the controversial procedure, he felt like a completely different person, almost as if he had been lobotomized 脑叶切除.

经过这项有争议的手术后，他感觉自己像是一个完全不同的人，几乎就像被lobotomized 脑叶切除。

4.He described his daily routine as lobotomized 脑叶切除, lacking any excitement or challenge.

他形容自己的日常生活为lobotomized 脑叶切除，缺乏任何兴奋或挑战。

5.Some critics argue that modern education systems leave students feeling lobotomized 脑叶切除 and unprepared for real-world challenges.

一些批评者认为，现代教育体系使学生感到lobotomized 脑叶切除，无法应对现实世界的挑战。

6.After years of monotonous work, she felt lobotomized 脑叶切除 and longed for something more fulfilling.

经过多年的单调工作，她感到lobotomized 脑叶切除，渴望更有成就感的事情。

7.The film depicted a society where creativity was suppressed, leaving its citizens feeling lobotomized 脑叶切除 and devoid of passion.

这部电影描绘了一个创造力被压制的社会，使其公民感到lobotomized 脑叶切除，缺乏激情。

作文

In the realm of psychology and neuroscience, the term lobotomized refers to a surgical procedure that was once believed to alleviate severe mental disorders. The practice involved severing connections in the brain's prefrontal cortex, which was thought to reduce symptoms of conditions such as schizophrenia and severe depression. However, the consequences of being lobotomized were often devastating, leading to significant personality changes, emotional flattening, and a loss of cognitive abilities. This historical context provides a stark reminder of how far we have come in understanding mental health and the ethical implications of treatment methods.The story of lobotomy begins in the early 20th century when mental illness was poorly understood, and patients often faced harsh treatments. In an attempt to find relief for those suffering from debilitating psychiatric conditions, some doctors resorted to radical measures. The first lobotomy was performed by Portuguese neurologist António Egas Moniz in 1935, who believed that cutting certain brain fibers could bring about improvement. Moniz was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1949 for his work, but the acclaim would soon be overshadowed by the negative outcomes associated with the procedure.As lobotomies became more common in the 1940s and 1950s, the medical community began to witness the troubling effects of this intervention. Many patients who underwent the procedure were left in a state of emotional numbness, unable to engage meaningfully with the world around them. Friends and family members often reported that their loved ones had become lobotomized, losing not just their mental anguish but also their personalities and desires. This transformation raised ethical questions about the rights of individuals undergoing such invasive procedures without fully understanding the potential consequences.The decline of lobotomy as a treatment option coincided with the emergence of antipsychotic medications and more humane therapeutic practices. Psychiatrists began to explore alternative approaches that respected the dignity and autonomy of patients. The shift away from lobotomy marked a significant turning point in mental health treatment, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and patient-centered care.Today, the legacy of lobotomy serves as a cautionary tale. It highlights the dangers of dehumanizing medical practices and the necessity for continuous ethical reflection in the field of mental health. The term lobotomized has since entered popular culture as a metaphor for someone who has been rendered passive or incapable of independent thought, reflecting a broader societal concern about conformity and the suppression of individuality.In conclusion, understanding the term lobotomized requires us to look back at a dark chapter in the history of psychiatry. It reminds us of the importance of empathy and ethical responsibility in treating mental illness. As we continue to advance in our understanding of the brain and mental health, we must ensure that our approaches prioritize the well-being and dignity of those we seek to help, never allowing history to repeat itself. The word lobotomized encapsulates not just a medical procedure, but a profound lesson on the complexities of human experience and the need for compassion in healthcare.

在心理学和神经科学领域，术语lobotomized指的是一种曾被认为可以缓解严重精神疾病的外科手术。该手术涉及切断大脑前额皮层中的连接，据信可以减轻如精神分裂症和严重抑郁症等病症的症状。然而，被lobotomized的后果往往是毁灭性的，导致显著的人格变化、情感平坦，以及认知能力的丧失。这一历史背景提醒我们，在理解心理健康和治疗方法的伦理意义方面，我们已经走了多远。脑白质切除术的故事始于20世纪初，当时精神疾病的理解仍然很有限，患者常常面临严酷的治疗。为了为那些遭受严重精神障碍折磨的人寻找缓解措施，一些医生采取了激进的措施。1935年，葡萄牙神经学家安东尼奥·埃加斯·莫尼兹首次进行了脑白质切除术，他相信切断某些大脑纤维可以带来改善。莫尼兹因其工作于1949年获得诺贝尔生理学或医学奖，但这一荣誉很快就被与该手术相关的负面结果所掩盖。随着脑白质切除术在1940年代和1950年代变得越来越普遍，医学界开始目睹这种干预的困扰性影响。许多接受该手术的患者被遗留在一种情感麻木的状态中，无法与周围世界进行有意义的互动。朋友和家人常常报告说，他们的亲人已经变得lobotomized，失去了不仅是心理上的痛苦，还有他们的人格和欲望。这种转变引发了关于接受如此侵入性程序的个人权利的伦理问题。脑白质切除术作为治疗选择的衰退与抗精神病药物和更人性化的治疗方法的出现相吻合。精神科医生开始探索尊重患者尊严和自主权的替代方法。远离脑白质切除术的转变标志着精神健康治疗的重要转折点，强调了知情同意和以患者为中心的护理的重要性。今天，脑白质切除术的遗产作为一个警示故事，突显了非人道医疗实践的危险以及在精神健康领域持续进行伦理反思的必要性。术语lobotomized自此进入流行文化，成为比喻，用于形容那些被迫消极或无法独立思考的人，反映出社会对顺从和个体压制的更广泛关注。总之，理解术语lobotomized需要我们回顾精神病学历史上一个黑暗的篇章。它提醒我们在治疗心理疾病时同情心和伦理责任的重要性。随着我们在理解大脑和心理健康方面的不断进步，我们必须确保我们的方法优先考虑那些我们试图帮助的人的福祉和尊严，绝不要让历史重演。这个词lobotomized不仅概括了一种医疗程序，也传达了对人类体验复杂性的深刻教训，以及在医疗保健中需要的同情心。