hearings

简明释义

英[ˈhɪərɪŋz]美[ˈhɪrɪŋz]

n. 听证会；倾听；[生理]听觉（hearing 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The hearings have now recessed for dinner.

听证会现已暂时休会以便大家吃饭。

2.He appeared at this week's hearings.

他出席了本周的听证会。

3.Hearings began in Germany's biggest shareholder lawsuit.

德国最大的股东起诉案开始听证。

4.The Senate is due to begin hearings on a climate change bill later this month.

该参议员参加了在本月晚些时候开始的对气候变化提案的听证。

5.The Senate is replying with similar hearings of its own..

作为回应参议院也举行了对自己的类似的听证会。

6.Right now, we see the justices during their confirmation hearings and rarely after that.

如今，我们多只在听证会场合瞥见这些法官一眼，而其它时间知之甚少。

7.One source predicts no major shift in policy will be forthcoming at the committee hearings.

有一消息预言在委员会听证会上不会有政策上的重大变动。

8.House and Senate committees have held hearings in the past month.

上个月，众议院委员会，参议院委员会分别举行了听证会。

9.The Senate committee held several hearings to investigate the matter.

参议院委员会举行了几次听证会来调查此事。

10.The hearings will address concerns raised by the community.

此次听证会将解决社区提出的担忧。

11.Public hearings are essential for transparency in government.

公众听证会对于政府透明度至关重要。

12.She was called to testify at the hearings next week.

她被召唤下周在听证会上作证。

13.During the hearings, witnesses provided crucial evidence.

在听证会期间，证人提供了重要证据。

作文

In the realm of politics and law, the term hearings (听证会) plays a crucial role in the democratic process. These formal meetings are convened to gather information, assess evidence, and make decisions regarding various issues that affect the public and governance. Hearings can take place in a variety of contexts, such as congressional investigations, judicial proceedings, and administrative reviews. Each type of hearing serves a unique purpose but shares the common goal of transparency and accountability.One of the most well-known types of hearings is the congressional hearing. In the United States, Congress holds hearings to investigate matters of national importance, such as government misconduct or significant policy changes. These sessions often feature testimony from experts, stakeholders, and sometimes even whistleblowers. The information gathered during these hearings can lead to new legislation or reforms aimed at addressing the issues at hand.Moreover, hearings serve as a platform for public participation. Citizens have the opportunity to voice their opinions, concerns, and experiences related to the subject matter being discussed. This aspect of hearings is vital because it ensures that diverse perspectives are considered, fostering a more inclusive decision-making process. For instance, when a community faces a proposed development project, hearings can allow residents to express their views and influence the outcome.In the legal system, hearings are essential for ensuring justice. They provide a structured environment where parties involved in a dispute can present their arguments and evidence before a judge or jury. In criminal cases, hearings determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial, while in civil cases, they can resolve disputes without the need for a full trial. The integrity of the judicial process relies heavily on the fairness and thoroughness of these hearings.Furthermore, hearings are not limited to high-profile cases or governmental issues. They can also occur in various administrative settings, such as when regulatory agencies evaluate compliance with laws and regulations. For example, environmental hearings may be conducted to assess the impact of proposed industrial projects on local ecosystems. Here, experts and community members alike can provide input, which is crucial for informed decision-making.Despite their importance, hearings can sometimes face criticism. Some argue that they may be politicized or that the outcomes are predetermined, leading to skepticism about their effectiveness. Additionally, the accessibility of hearings can be a concern, as not all members of the public may have the means to attend or participate. Therefore, it is imperative that efforts are made to improve transparency and accessibility in these processes.In conclusion, hearings (听证会) are a fundamental aspect of democratic governance and the legal system. They provide a mechanism for information gathering, public participation, and accountability. While challenges exist, the continued evolution and improvement of hearings can enhance their effectiveness and ensure that they serve the public interest. As citizens, understanding the significance of hearings empowers us to engage more actively in the democratic process and advocate for our rights and interests.

在政治和法律领域，术语hearings（听证会）在民主过程中发挥着至关重要的作用。这些正式会议旨在收集信息、评估证据并就各种影响公众和治理的问题做出决定。Hearings可以在多种背景下进行，例如国会调查、司法程序和行政审查。每种类型的hearing都有其独特的目的，但共同目标是透明度和问责制。其中最著名的类型之一是国会听证会。在美国，国会举行hearings以调查国家重要性的问题，例如政府不当行为或重大政策变化。这些会议通常会邀请专家、利益相关者，甚至有时是举报人作证。在这些hearings期间收集的信息可以导致新的立法或改革，旨在解决当前的问题。此外，hearings作为公众参与的平台也至关重要。公民有机会表达他们对所讨论主题的意见、关注和经历。Hearings的这一方面至关重要，因为它确保考虑到不同的观点，从而促进更具包容性的决策过程。例如，当一个社区面临提议的开发项目时，hearings可以让居民表达他们的看法并影响结果。在法律系统中，hearings对于确保公正至关重要。它们提供了一个结构化的环境，使争议各方能够在法官或陪审团面前陈述他们的论点和证据。在刑事案件中，hearings确定是否有足够的证据进行审判，而在民事案件中，它们可以在不需要全面审判的情况下解决争议。司法过程的完整性在很大程度上依赖于这些hearings的公正和彻底。此外，hearings并不仅限于高调案件或政府问题。它们还可以在各种行政环境中发生，例如当监管机构评估遵守法律和法规的情况时。例如，环境hearings可能会进行，以评估拟议工业项目对当地生态系统的影响。在这里，专家和社区成员都可以提供意见，这对做出明智的决策至关重要。尽管它们很重要，但hearings有时会受到批评。一些人认为它们可能被政治化，或者结果是预先决定的，从而导致对其有效性的怀疑。此外，hearings的可及性可能是一个问题，因为并非所有公众成员都有能力参加或参与。因此，必须采取措施改善这些过程中的透明度和可及性。总之，hearings（听证会）是民主治理和法律系统的基本方面。它们提供了信息收集、公众参与和问责制的机制。虽然存在挑战，但hearings的持续发展和改进可以增强其有效性，并确保它们服务于公众利益。作为公民，理解hearings的重要性使我们能够更积极地参与民主进程，为我们的权利和利益辩护。