speciously
简明释义
adv. 外观好看地;似是而非地;华而不实地
英英释义
In a manner that seems plausible but is actually wrong or misleading. | 以看似合理但实际上错误或误导的方式。 |
单词用法
貌似合理的 | |
貌似有理的论证 | |
貌似合理的推理 | |
貌似正当的辩解 |
同义词
反义词
真实地 | 他在面试中真实地回答了问题。 | ||
诚实地 | 她诚实地表达了自己的感受。 | ||
有效地 | 这个论点得到了有效的证据支持。 |
例句
1.The author believed that these criticize speciously, with historical actually not symbol.
笔者认为,这些指摘都似是而非,与历史实际不符。
2.The author believed that these criticize speciously, with historical actually not symbol.
笔者认为,这些指摘都似是而非,与历史实际不符。
3.The politician argued speciously that his policies would benefit the economy, though many experts disagreed.
这位政治家似是而非地辩称他的政策将惠及经济,尽管许多专家不同意。
4.The company's claims about their product's effectiveness were deemed speciously optimistic by consumer advocates.
消费者倡导者认为该公司关于其产品有效性的说法似是而非,过于乐观。
5.He tried to convince us speciously that the new policy would not affect our jobs.
他试图似是而非地说服我们新政策不会影响我们的工作。
6.Her explanation was speciously logical, but it failed to consider the key factors.
她的解释似是而非地合乎逻辑,但未能考虑关键因素。
7.She presented her case speciously, using misleading statistics to support her argument.
她似是而非地提出了她的论点,使用误导性的统计数据来支持她的论证。
作文
In the realm of persuasive writing, one often encounters arguments that appear convincing at first glance but lack substantial evidence or sound reasoning. Such arguments can be described as being presented speciously, which means they are misleadingly attractive or seemingly plausible but ultimately deceptive. Understanding this concept is crucial for anyone who wishes to engage in critical thinking and effective communication.For instance, consider a debate about climate change. A speaker might present statistics that suggest a temporary decline in global temperatures, arguing that this indicates a reversal of climate change. At first, this argument seems valid; however, upon closer examination, one might discover that the data is cherry-picked or taken out of context. This is a classic example of a specious argument, where the surface-level appeal masks a lack of rigorous analysis.Moreover, in advertising, companies often use speciously crafted messages to entice consumers. A product might be marketed as 'all-natural' or 'scientifically proven,' leading potential buyers to believe it is superior to competitors. However, without clear definitions or scientific backing, such claims can be misleading. Consumers must learn to look beyond the surface and question the validity of these assertions, recognizing when they are being drawn in by specious rhetoric.The danger of speciously constructed arguments extends beyond everyday conversations and advertisements; it can have significant implications in politics as well. Politicians may use specious reasoning to justify policies that are not in the public's best interest. For example, a politician might argue that tax cuts for the wealthy will lead to job creation, a claim that sounds reasonable but often lacks empirical support. When voters accept such arguments without scrutiny, they risk supporting decisions that could harm the economy or exacerbate inequality.To combat the influence of speciously presented information, individuals must cultivate critical thinking skills. This involves questioning the sources of information, seeking out multiple perspectives, and being aware of cognitive biases that may cloud judgment. By doing so, one can better discern between genuine arguments and those that are merely specious in nature.In conclusion, the term speciously serves as a reminder to approach information with skepticism and diligence. Whether in writing, advertising, or politics, recognizing specious arguments can empower individuals to make informed decisions. As we navigate an increasingly complex world filled with competing narratives, the ability to identify and challenge speciously presented claims will undoubtedly serve us well in our pursuit of truth and understanding.
在说服性写作的领域中,人们经常会遇到那些乍一看似乎令人信服但缺乏实质证据或合理推理的论点。这种论点可以被描述为以speciously(似是而非地)呈现,这意味着它们在表面上具有误导性的吸引力或看似合理,但最终却是欺骗性的。理解这个概念对任何希望进行批判性思维和有效沟通的人来说都是至关重要的。例如,考虑关于气候变化的辩论。一位发言者可能会提出统计数据,表明全球温度暂时下降,争辩说这表明气候变化的逆转。乍一看,这个论点似乎有效;然而,经过仔细审查,人们可能会发现这些数据是选择性引用的或脱离了背景。这是一个经典的specious(似是而非的)论点的例子,在这个例子中,表面的吸引力掩盖了缺乏严谨分析的事实。此外,在广告中,公司常常使用speciously(似是而非地)制作的信息来吸引消费者。一款产品可能被宣传为“全天然”或“科学证明”,使潜在买家相信它优于竞争对手。然而,如果没有明确的定义或科学依据,这些声明可能会误导消费者。消费者必须学会超越表面,质疑这些主张的有效性,认识到自己何时被specious(似是而非的)修辞所吸引。Speciously(似是而非地)构建的论点的危险超出了日常对话和广告;它在政治上也可能产生重大影响。政治家可能利用specious(似是而非的)推理来为不符合公众最佳利益的政策辩护。例如,一位政治家可能会争辩说,对富人的减税将导致就业创造,这一论点听起来合理,但往往缺乏实证支持。当选民在没有审查的情况下接受这样的论点时,他们冒着支持可能损害经济或加剧不平等的决定的风险。为了抵御speciously(似是而非地)呈现的信息的影响,个人必须培养批判性思维技能。这涉及到质疑信息的来源,寻求多种观点,并意识到可能影响判断的认知偏见。通过这样做,人们可以更好地辨别真正的论点与那些仅仅是specious(似是而非的)本质之间的区别。总之,术语speciously(似是而非地)提醒我们以怀疑和勤奋的态度看待信息。无论是在写作、广告还是政治中,识别specious(似是而非的)论点可以赋予个人做出明智决策的能力。在我们驾驭一个日益复杂、充满竞争叙事的世界时,识别和挑战speciously(似是而非地)呈现的主张的能力无疑会在我们追求真理和理解的过程中为我们提供帮助。