arrogation
简明释义
n. 诈称;僭越;霸占
英英释义
The act of claiming or taking something for oneself without justification or right. | 在没有正当理由或权利的情况下,自行声称或占有某物的行为。 |
单词用法
权力的专断 | |
权利的自我宣称 | |
不公正的专断 | |
权威的自我宣称 |
同义词
反义词
放弃 | 他放弃权力的决定出乎意料。 | ||
抛弃 | The abandonment of the project left many workers unemployed. | 项目的抛弃使许多工人失业。 | |
投降 | 将军的投降标志着冲突的结束。 |
例句
1.He clung to the destruction, impinge and arrogation of the civilization by death. Hiding behind the figures of women, he expressed his rebel mind with extreme sense stimulation.
他贪恋死亡对“文明世界”的破坏、侵犯和僭越,他藏匿在女性形象背后,用极端的感官刺激,来言说反叛的心曲。
2.He clung to the destruction, impinge and arrogation of the civilization by death. Hiding behind the figures of women, he expressed his rebel mind with extreme sense stimulation.
他贪恋死亡对“文明世界”的破坏、侵犯和僭越,他藏匿在女性形象背后,用极端的感官刺激,来言说反叛的心曲。
3.Secondly, Two opposite situations appear. One is that there are arrogation and recession in the implementation process of teachers' legal authority.
第二,教师在施行法定权威的过程中出现僭越与退缩两种极端情况。
4.The company's decision to cut employee benefits without consulting anyone was seen as an arrogation 专横行为 of its authority.
该公司在没有咨询任何人的情况下削减员工福利的决定被视为一种arrogation 专横行为。
5.His arrogation 自以为是 of the role of team leader caused significant friction among team members.
他对团队领导角色的arrogation 自以为是导致团队成员之间产生了重大摩擦。
6.The arrogation 霸权行为 of power by the ruling party has led to widespread protests.
执政党对权力的arrogation 霸权行为导致了广泛的抗议。
7.The arrogation 强行干预 of the management in personal matters created a toxic work environment.
管理层在个人事务中的arrogation 强行干预造成了有毒的工作环境。
8.Her arrogation 自作主张 of the project direction alienated her colleagues.
她对项目方向的arrogation 自作主张使同事们感到疏远。
作文
In today's world, the concept of authority and power is often a subject of debate. Many individuals and organizations attempt to assert their influence over others, sometimes leading to situations where the act of arrogation (擅取) becomes evident. This term refers to the act of claiming something for oneself without justification or the right to do so. It is essential to understand that while some level of confidence is necessary for leadership, crossing the line into arrogation can lead to serious consequences.Consider a corporate environment where a manager may feel entitled to make decisions that affect their team without consulting them. This behavior exemplifies arrogation, as it disregards the input and expertise of others. The manager may believe that their position grants them the authority to act unilaterally, but this can foster resentment among team members and diminish morale. When individuals in power engage in arrogation, they risk alienating those around them and creating a toxic work culture.Moreover, arrogation is not limited to the workplace; it can occur in various aspects of life, including politics and social interactions. Politicians who impose laws without considering the voices of their constituents are engaging in arrogation. They may believe that their experience or knowledge gives them the right to dictate terms, but in reality, such actions can lead to public discontent and unrest. Citizens expect their leaders to listen and represent their interests, and when this does not happen, trust is eroded.In personal relationships, arrogation can manifest in different ways. For instance, when one partner makes decisions for both without consulting the other, it can create feelings of resentment and inequality. Healthy relationships thrive on mutual respect and communication, and any form of arrogation can disrupt this balance. It is crucial for individuals to recognize the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making in maintaining harmony.The consequences of arrogation extend beyond interpersonal relationships. In a broader societal context, when groups or nations engage in arrogation, it can lead to conflicts and wars. History is replete with examples of powerful nations imposing their will on weaker ones, claiming resources or territory under the guise of superiority. Such actions often result in long-lasting animosities and cycles of violence, highlighting the dangers of unchecked power and the need for accountability.To combat arrogation, it is essential to cultivate humility and openness in our interactions. Leaders must be willing to listen to feedback and acknowledge the contributions of others. By fostering an environment where collaboration is valued, we can mitigate the risks associated with arrogation and promote a culture of respect and inclusivity.In conclusion, understanding the implications of arrogation is vital for building healthy relationships, whether in the workplace, in politics, or in personal lives. By recognizing the fine line between confidence and arrogation, we can strive to create spaces where everyone feels valued and heard. Ultimately, it is through cooperation and respect that we can achieve greater outcomes, free from the pitfalls of arrogation.
在当今世界,权威和权力的概念常常成为辩论的主题。许多个人和组织试图对他人施加影响,这有时会导致“arrogation”(擅取)的行为变得明显。这个术语指的是在没有正当理由或权利来做某事的情况下,声称某物为自己所有。理解到,虽然一定程度的自信对于领导力是必要的,但越过进入arrogation的界限可能会导致严重后果。考虑一个企业环境,其中一位经理可能会觉得有权在不咨询团队的情况下做出影响他们的决策。这种行为就是arrogation的典范,因为它无视了他人的意见和专业知识。经理可能相信他们的职位赋予他们单方面行动的权利,但这可能会在团队成员中造成怨恨,降低士气。当掌权者参与arrogation时,他们冒着疏远周围人的风险,并创造一个有毒的工作文化。此外,arrogation并不限于工作场所;它可以在生活的各个方面发生,包括政治和社会互动。那些在未考虑其选民声音的情况下强加法律的政治家正在进行arrogation。他们可能认为自己的经验或知识赋予了他们规定条款的权利,但实际上,这种行为可能导致公众的不满和动荡。公民期望他们的领导者倾听并代表他们的利益,而当这种情况没有发生时,信任就会被侵蚀。在个人关系中,arrogation可以以不同的方式表现出来。例如,当一方在没有咨询另一方的情况下为双方做决定时,这可能会产生怨恨和不平等的感觉。健康的关系依赖于相互尊重和沟通,任何形式的arrogation都可能破坏这种平衡。个人认识到在维护和谐中合作与共同决策的重要性至关重要。arrogation的后果超出了人际关系。在更广泛的社会背景下,当群体或国家参与arrogation时,可能会导致冲突和战争。历史上充斥着强国在弱国身上施加意志的例子,声称资源或领土优越的理由。这种行为往往导致长期的仇恨和暴力循环,突显了不受控制的权力的危险以及对问责制的需求。为了对抗arrogation,培养谦逊和开放的交流至关重要。领导者必须愿意倾听反馈,并承认他人的贡献。通过培养一种重视合作的环境,我们可以减轻与arrogation相关的风险,促进尊重和包容的文化。总之,理解arrogation的含义对于建立健康的关系至关重要,无论是在工作场所、政治还是个人生活中。通过认识到自信与arrogation之间的细微差别,我们可以努力创造一个每个人都感到被重视和倾听的空间。最终,正是通过合作和尊重,我们才能实现更大的成果,摆脱arrogation的陷阱。