contrarily

简明释义

英[kənˈtreərɪli]美[kənˈtrerɪli]

adv. 相反地；反之；反对地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Contrarily, if a linear scale is installed between the table and the machine structure, the linear movement is measured directly.

反之，如果线性刻度表之间的结构和机器安装，直线运动直接测量。

2.Contrarily, the output module accepts information of mining model and outputs the PMML document.

导出模块则相反地读取数据挖掘模型相关信息，输出pmml文档。

3.Man might think that few woman fit him before his marriage, and contrarily when they get married.

男人在结婚前觉得适合自己的女人很少，结婚后发觉适合自己的女人很多。

4.Contrarily, modern new construction puts both his beginning and ending in its body, its "Herkunft".

而当代的新建筑则把建筑的起点和终点置于其“来源”的身体之中。

5.Many people have done that contrarily.

许多人做的与此恰恰相反。

6.Sometimes man might think that few women fit him before his marriage, and contrarily when they get married.

有的男人在结婚前觉得适合自己的女人很少，结婚后觉得适合自己的女人很多。

7.The difference between two spectrum is more visible, the camouflage effect is worse. Contrarily, the effect is better.

谱线的差异越大，说明伪装效果越差，反之，说明伪装效果好。

8.The movie was expected to be a hit; contrarily 相反地, it received terrible reviews.

这部电影原本被期望成为热门；相反地 相反地, 它收到了糟糕的评价。

9.I thought he would agree with the plan; contrarily 相反地, he opposed it strongly.

我以为他会同意这个计划；相反地 相反地, 他强烈反对。

10.She expected the team to lose; contrarily 相反地, they won the championship.

她预计团队会输；相反地 相反地, 他们赢得了冠军。

11.He thought the weather would be nice; contrarily 相反地, it started to rain.

他认为天气会很好；相反地 相反地, 开始下雨了。

12.The report suggested a decline in sales; contrarily 相反地, sales increased significantly.

报告建议销售额下降；相反地 相反地, 销售额显著增加。

作文

In the realm of education, there is a persistent debate about the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods versus modern, technology-driven approaches. Many educators advocate for the use of digital tools and interactive platforms to engage students more effectively. However, some argue that traditional methods still hold significant value in fostering deep understanding and critical thinking skills. Contrarily (相反地), those who support traditional teaching methods believe that face-to-face interaction and direct instruction can lead to better retention of information. They emphasize the importance of building relationships between teachers and students, which can be diminished in a purely digital environment.The argument for modern methods often highlights the advantages of accessibility and personalization. With the rise of online learning, students can access a wealth of resources at their fingertips, allowing them to learn at their own pace. Contrarily (相反地), critics of this approach point out that not all students have equal access to technology, which can create disparities in learning opportunities. This raises important questions about equity in education and whether technology truly enhances learning for everyone.Moreover, proponents of traditional education argue that critical thinking cannot be effectively taught through screens. They contend that discussions, debates, and collaborative projects in a classroom setting encourage students to think critically and articulate their ideas clearly. Contrarily (相反地), supporters of technology argue that online forums and virtual group work can provide similar benefits. They believe that the digital space allows for a broader range of perspectives and ideas, as students can connect with peers from different backgrounds and cultures.Another aspect to consider is the role of assessment in education. Traditional methods often rely on standardized testing to measure student performance, which can be limiting. Contrarily (相反地), many modern educational frameworks advocate for formative assessments that focus on student growth and understanding over time. This shift recognizes that learning is a process and that students may demonstrate their knowledge in various ways beyond just test scores.In conclusion, the debate between traditional and modern educational methods is complex and multifaceted. While each approach has its merits, it is essential to recognize that the effectiveness of teaching methods can vary depending on individual student needs and contexts. Contrarily (相反地), rather than viewing these methods as mutually exclusive, educators should consider integrating both traditional and modern strategies to create a more holistic and inclusive learning environment. By doing so, we can ensure that all students have the opportunity to thrive and succeed in their educational journeys.

在教育领域，关于传统教学方法与现代技术驱动方法的有效性一直存在争论。许多教育者主张使用数字工具和互动平台，以更有效地吸引学生。然而，一些人则认为传统方法在培养深刻理解和批判性思维技能方面仍然具有重要价值。相反地，那些支持传统教学方法的人相信，面对面的互动和直接的指导可以带来更好的信息记忆。他们强调建立教师与学生之间关系的重要性，而这种关系在纯数字环境中可能会减弱。现代方法的论点通常强调可访问性和个性化的优势。随着在线学习的兴起，学生可以在指尖上访问大量资源，使他们能够以自己的节奏学习。相反地，批评这种方法的人指出，并非所有学生都能平等地接触到技术，这可能导致学习机会的不平等。这引发了关于教育公平的重要问题，以及技术是否真的增强了每个人的学习。此外，传统教育的支持者认为，批判性思维无法通过屏幕有效教授。他们主张课堂讨论、辩论和合作项目鼓励学生进行批判性思考并清晰表达自己的想法。相反地，技术支持者认为，在线论坛和虚拟小组工作可以提供类似的好处。他们相信，数字空间允许更广泛的观点和思想，因为学生可以与来自不同背景和文化的同龄人联系。另一个需要考虑的方面是评估在教育中的角色。传统方法通常依赖标准化测试来衡量学生表现，这可能是有限的。相反地，许多现代教育框架提倡以形成性评估为重点，关注学生的成长和理解，而不仅仅是考试成绩。这种转变承认学习是一个过程，学生可以通过多种方式展示他们的知识，而不仅仅是测试分数。总之，传统与现代教育方法之间的辩论是复杂而多面的。虽然每种方法都有其优点，但必须认识到，教学方法的有效性因个别学生的需求和背景而异。相反地，教育者应考虑将传统和现代策略结合起来，以创建更全面和包容的学习环境。通过这样做，我们可以确保所有学生在教育旅程中都有机会茁壮成长和成功。