talion

简明释义

英[/ˈtæliən/]美[/ˈtæliən/]

n. 以牙还牙的报复法

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And this casts the principle of talion, I hope, in a new light.

这以一种新的见解反映了报复的原则。

2.And this casts the principle of talion, I hope, in a new light.

这以一种新的见解反映了报复的原则。

3.The concept of talion is present in various religious texts.

在各种宗教经典中都存在报应法则的概念。

4.In ancient societies, justice was often served through talion rather than rehabilitation.

在古代社会，正义往往通过报应法则而不是康复来实现。

5.Some argue that talion creates a cycle of violence that is hard to break.

有些人认为报应法则会造成难以打破的暴力循环。

6.The principle of an eye for an eye is often referred to as talion.

以眼还眼的原则通常被称为报应法则。

7.The law of talion can be seen in many historical legal systems.

在许多历史法律体系中可以看到报应法则。

作文

The concept of talion, derived from the Latin phrase "lex talionis," refers to the principle of retributive justice, often summarized by the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." This principle has been a fundamental aspect of many legal systems throughout history and continues to influence modern notions of justice and punishment. Understanding talion requires delving into its historical context and its implications in contemporary society.Historically, the idea of talion can be traced back to ancient civilizations, including the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi, which established laws that sought to ensure that punishments were proportionate to the offenses committed. For example, if someone caused harm to another person, the offender would receive a punishment that mirrored the injury inflicted. This system aimed to prevent excessive retribution and to promote a sense of balance within the community.In many ways, talion reflects a primal instinct for vengeance that is deeply rooted in human nature. The desire for revenge can be seen in various cultures, where the notion of 'getting even' often prevails over forgiveness or reconciliation. However, the strict application of talion can lead to a cycle of violence, where each act of retribution prompts further retaliation. This cycle highlights the potential dangers of adhering too rigidly to the principles of talion without considering the broader consequences of such actions.In contemporary society, the application of talion is often debated in the context of criminal justice. While some argue that a strict interpretation of talion can provide a clear framework for punishment, others contend that it fails to account for the complexities of human behavior and the need for rehabilitation. Modern legal systems typically emphasize the importance of proportionality in sentencing, but they also recognize the value of restorative justice approaches that focus on healing rather than mere retribution.Moreover, the rise of restorative justice practices challenges the traditional views of talion. By prioritizing dialogue and understanding between victims and offenders, restorative justice seeks to address the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior. This approach can lead to more meaningful resolutions and may help break the cycle of violence that talion can perpetuate.The ethical implications of talion are also significant. In a world increasingly focused on human rights and dignity, the idea of exacting equal punishment raises questions about morality and justice. Is it truly just to inflict suffering on another person, even if it mirrors the harm they caused? Many philosophers argue that true justice should transcend the primitive instincts encapsulated in talion and instead strive for a more compassionate and understanding approach to wrongdoing.In conclusion, while the principle of talion has played an essential role in shaping legal and moral frameworks throughout history, its application in modern society is complex and multifaceted. As we continue to grapple with issues of justice and punishment, it is crucial to consider the lessons learned from the past and to seek more humane and effective methods of addressing wrongdoing. Balancing the instinct for retribution with the need for compassion and understanding remains a challenge, but it is one that is vital for the evolution of our legal systems and societal norms.

“talion”这个概念源自拉丁短语“lex talionis”，指的是报应正义的原则，通常用“以眼还眼，以牙还牙”来概括。这个原则在历史上许多法律体系中一直是一个基本方面，并继续影响现代对正义和惩罚的观念。理解“talion”需要深入探讨其历史背景及其在当代社会中的影响。从历史上看，“talion”的思想可以追溯到古代文明，包括巴比伦的汉谟拉比法典，该法典建立了旨在确保惩罚与所犯罪行成比例的法律。例如，如果某人对另一个人造成伤害，施害者将受到与所造成伤害相对应的惩罚。这个系统旨在防止过度报复，并促进社区内的平衡感。在许多方面，“talion”反映了根植于人性中的一种原始报复本能。对复仇的渴望可以在各种文化中看到，其中“报复”的观念往往胜过宽恕或和解。然而，严格应用“talion”可能导致暴力循环，每一次报复行为都促使进一步的报复。这一循环突显了在没有考虑这些行为更广泛后果的情况下，过于严格遵循“talion”原则的潜在危险。在当代社会，“talion”的应用通常在刑事司法的背景下进行辩论。虽然一些人认为严格解释“talion”可以为惩罚提供明确的框架，但其他人则认为它未能考虑人类行为的复杂性和康复的必要性。现代法律系统通常强调量刑的适当性，但他们也认识到恢复性司法方法的价值，这种方法关注的是治愈而非单纯的报复。此外，恢复性司法实践的兴起挑战了对“talion”的传统看法。通过优先考虑受害者和施害者之间的对话与理解，恢复性司法旨在解决导致犯罪行为的根本问题。这种方法可以导致更有意义的解决方案，并可能帮助打破“talion”可能延续的暴力循环。“talion”的伦理含义也非常重要。在一个越来越关注人权和尊严的世界里，施加等同的惩罚的想法引发了关于道德和正义的问题。即使这种惩罚与他们造成的伤害相符，施加痛苦于他人是否真的公正？许多哲学家认为，真正的正义应该超越“talion”所包含的原始本能，而努力追求更具同情心和理解的错误处理方式。总之，尽管“talion”原则在塑造历史上的法律和道德框架中发挥了重要作用，但它在现代社会中的应用是复杂而多面的。在我们继续面对正义和惩罚问题时，考虑从过去吸取的教训并寻求更人道和有效的方法来处理不当行为至关重要。平衡报复的本能与同情和理解的需求仍然是一个挑战，但这是我们法律系统和社会规范演变中至关重要的挑战。