turfing

简明释义

英[ˈtɜːfɪŋ]美[ˈtɜrfɪŋ]

n. 植草皮；铺草

v. 用草皮覆盖（turf 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.After turfing the area, the landscapers were pleased with how vibrant the grass looked.

在turfing该区域后，园艺师对草坪的色彩感到满意。

2.They spent the weekend turfing their backyard to create a more inviting space for guests.

他们花了一个周末在后院turfing，以创造一个更受欢迎的空间供客人使用。

3.The team is focusing on turfing the new marketing strategy to increase local engagement.

团队专注于turfing新的营销策略，以增加当地参与度。

4.The city council approved funds for turfing sports fields to enhance recreational facilities.

市议会批准资金用于turfing运动场，以增强休闲设施。

5.The school organized a community event focused on turfing and beautifying the local park.

学校组织了一次社区活动，专注于turfing和美化当地公园。

作文

In recent years, the concept of turfing has gained significant attention in various fields, particularly in marketing and online communities. turfing refers to the practice of creating or promoting content that is designed to attract a specific audience while often disregarding the quality or authenticity of the information presented. This phenomenon can be observed in numerous online platforms where users are encouraged to generate content that may not genuinely reflect their views or experiences but rather aims to manipulate engagement metrics for personal or organizational gain.The rise of social media has contributed to the prevalence of turfing. For instance, many companies hire individuals or agencies to create fake accounts and post positive reviews about their products or services. This tactic, although effective in the short term, can lead to long-term reputational damage once consumers realize they have been misled. In this sense, turfing undermines trust between businesses and their customers, ultimately harming the very relationships that companies strive to build.Moreover, turfing has extended beyond commercial enterprises and into political arenas. During election seasons, it is not uncommon for candidates to engage in turfing by employing strategies that involve spreading misinformation or overly biased content to sway public opinion. This manipulation of information can create divisions within communities and foster an environment where genuine discourse is stifled. As a result, the integrity of democratic processes is called into question, leading to further disillusionment among voters.Despite its negative implications, some argue that turfing can serve a purpose in certain contexts. For example, grassroots movements may utilize turfing techniques to gain visibility and support for their causes. By generating buzz and engaging audiences through strategic content creation, these movements can amplify their messages and mobilize individuals who share their passions. However, the ethical implications of such actions remain contentious, as the line between genuine advocacy and deceptive practices becomes increasingly blurred.To combat the detrimental effects of turfing, various platforms have begun implementing stricter regulations and guidelines regarding content creation and user engagement. These measures aim to promote transparency and authenticity, encouraging users to share their true opinions and experiences rather than resorting to manipulative tactics. Additionally, educating consumers about the signs of turfing can empower them to make informed decisions when interacting with online content.In conclusion, turfing is a multifaceted issue that poses challenges across different sectors, from business to politics. While it may offer short-term benefits for some, the long-term consequences of turfing can be detrimental to trust, authenticity, and meaningful communication. As society continues to navigate the complexities of the digital age, it is essential to prioritize integrity and honesty in our interactions, both online and offline. Only then can we foster environments that encourage genuine connection and understanding among individuals and communities.

近年来，turfing的概念在各个领域，尤其是在营销和在线社区中，受到了广泛关注。turfing指的是创建或推广旨在吸引特定受众的内容，而往往忽视所提供信息的质量或真实性的做法。这种现象可以在许多在线平台上观察到，用户被鼓励生成可能并不真正反映他们观点或经历的内容，而是旨在操纵参与度指标以获取个人或组织利益。社交媒体的兴起促进了turfing的普及。例如，许多公司雇佣个人或机构创建假账户，并发布关于其产品或服务的积极评论。这种策略虽然在短期内有效，但一旦消费者意识到自己受到误导，可能会导致长期的声誉损害。从这个意义上说，turfing破坏了企业与客户之间的信任，最终伤害了公司努力建立的关系。此外，turfing已经超越了商业企业，进入了政治领域。在选举季节，候选人进行turfing的情况并不少见，他们采用传播虚假信息或过于偏见内容的策略来影响公众舆论。这种信息操控可能在社区内造成分裂，并滋生一种真实话语受到压制的环境。因此，民主过程的完整性受到质疑，导致选民进一步失望。尽管有负面影响，但一些人认为在某些情况下，turfing可以发挥作用。例如，草根运动可能利用turfing技术来获得其事业的可见性和支持。通过生成热议并通过战略内容创作吸引受众，这些运动可以放大他们的信息并动员分享他们激情的个人。然而，这种行为的伦理影响仍然存在争议，因为真正倡导与欺骗性行为之间的界限变得越来越模糊。为了应对turfing的有害影响，各个平台已开始实施更严格的内容创建和用户参与的法规和指南。这些措施旨在促进透明度和真实性，鼓励用户分享他们的真实意见和经历，而不是诉诸操控性策略。此外，教育消费者识别turfing的迹象，可以使他们在与在线内容互动时做出明智的决策。总之，turfing是一个多方面的问题，在商业到政治的不同领域都带来了挑战。虽然它可能为一些人提供短期利益，但turfing的长期后果可能对信任、真实性和有意义的沟通造成损害。随着社会继续在数字时代的复杂性中航行，优先考虑我们互动中的诚信和诚实至关重要，只有这样，我们才能在个人和社区之间培养鼓励真正联系和理解的环境。