unratified

简明释义

英[ʌnˈrætɪfaɪd]美[ʌnˈrætəˌfaɪd]

未批准的

未批准

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.For years, Microsoft was loathe to adopt support for unratified standards, considering them a moving target and thus a waste of time.

多年来，微软一直痛恨支持未获批准的标准，认为他们前途难料，花时间支持纯属浪费。

2.Or are his demands deliberately maximalist so that they cannot be met and the treaty remains unratified?

或者，他是故意夸大要求让它们无法实现，从而使条约依旧悬而不决？

3.Either of these options, however, could take a long time, leaving the treaty vulnerable to a British referendum if the Conservatives gain power with Lisbon still unratified.

不过，这两种选择做起来都需要很长时间。在《里斯本条约》依旧未获批准的情况下，如果英国保守党重掌大权，此条约在英国很可能会被要求进行公民投票。

4.Either of these options, however, could take a long time, leaving the treaty vulnerable to a British referendum if the Conservatives gain power with Lisbon still unratified.

不过，这两种选择做起来都需要很长时间。在《里斯本条约》依旧未获批准的情况下，如果英国保守党重掌大权，此条约在英国很可能会被要求进行公民投票。

5.The unratified documents were sent back for further review.

这些未批准的文件被送回以进一步审查。

6.Many countries have signed the agreement, but it is still unratified by several key nations.

许多国家已签署该协议，但仍有几个关键国家未批准。

7.Her proposal remains unratified by the board despite initial support.

尽管最初获得支持，她的提案仍然被董事会未批准。

8.The treaty remains unratified due to ongoing negotiations.

由于正在进行谈判，该条约仍然处于未批准状态。

9.The unratified amendment has sparked a debate among lawmakers.

该未批准的修正案引发了立法者之间的辩论。

作文

In the realm of international relations and governance, treaties play a crucial role in establishing agreements between nations. However, not all treaties achieve the status of law; some remain unratified due to various political, social, or economic reasons. An unratified treaty is one that has been signed by representatives of the countries involved but has not yet been formally approved by their respective legislative bodies. This lack of ratification can lead to significant consequences for international cooperation and the enforcement of laws. One prominent example of an unratified treaty is the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Signed in 1996, this treaty aims to ban all nuclear explosions for both civilian and military purposes. Although many countries have signed the CTBT, it remains unratified by key states, including the United States. The failure to ratify this treaty has resulted in ongoing debates about nuclear disarmament and the potential for nuclear proliferation. The implications of having unratified treaties extend beyond the immediate parties involved. For instance, when a significant number of countries do not ratify a treaty, it undermines the credibility and effectiveness of international law. This situation can create a perception that the treaty lacks legitimacy, leading other nations to question whether they should adhere to its principles. Consequently, the existence of unratified treaties can hinder global efforts to address pressing issues such as climate change, human rights, and security. Moreover, the process of ratification varies from country to country. In some nations, treaties must be approved by a simple majority in the legislature, while in others, they may require a supermajority or even a national referendum. This complexity can result in delays and challenges in securing ratification, particularly if there is political opposition or public dissent regarding the treaty's provisions. As a result, many treaties remain unratified for extended periods, causing frustration among the signatory nations and stakeholders who advocate for the treaty's objectives. In conclusion, the status of unratified treaties serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in international diplomacy. While treaties are essential tools for fostering cooperation and addressing global issues, the failure to ratify them can significantly impede progress. It is crucial for countries to engage in constructive dialogue and work towards overcoming the barriers that lead to unratified agreements. Only through commitment and collaboration can we hope to transform these unratified treaties into effective instruments for peace and cooperation on the world stage.

在国际关系和治理的领域中，条约在国家之间建立协议方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而，并非所有的条约都能获得法律地位；一些条约由于各种政治、社会或经济原因而保持未批准的状态。未批准的条约是指已由相关国家的代表签署，但尚未得到各自立法机构正式批准的条约。这种缺乏批准的情况可能对国际合作和法律的执行产生重大影响。一个显著的未批准条约的例子是《全面禁止核试验条约》（CTBT）。该条约于1996年签署，旨在禁止所有民用和军事目的的核爆炸。尽管许多国家已签署CTBT，但它在包括美国在内的一些关键国家中仍处于未批准状态。未能批准该条约导致了关于核裁军和核扩散潜力的持续辩论。拥有未批准条约的影响超出了直接相关方的范围。例如，当大量国家未能批准某一条约时，这会削弱国际法的可信度和有效性。这种情况可能会导致人们认为该条约缺乏合法性，从而使其他国家质疑是否应遵守其原则。因此，未批准条约的存在可能会阻碍全球应对气候变化、人权和安全等紧迫问题的努力。此外，批准的过程因国而异。在一些国家，条约必须经过立法机构的简单多数批准，而在其他国家，可能需要超多数甚至全国公投。这种复杂性可能导致延误和挑战，尤其是在对条约条款存在政治反对或公众异议的情况下。因此，许多条约在很长一段时间内保持未批准状态，给签署国和倡导条约目标的利益相关者带来了挫折。总之，未批准条约的状态提醒我们国际外交中固有的复杂性和挑战。虽然条约是促进合作和解决全球问题的重要工具，但未能批准它们可能显著阻碍进展。各国必须积极进行建设性对话，努力克服导致条约未批准的障碍。只有通过承诺和合作，我们才能希望将这些未批准的条约转变为全球舞台上实现和平与合作的有效工具。