tetrarchy

简明释义

英['tetrɑːkɪ]美[ˈteˌtrɑːrki]

n. 四帝共治制

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mt 8: 5-13) stresses the importance of the village as a crossroad for many travellers leaving and entering the Tetrarchy of Herod Antipas.

玛八5-13）强调村庄的重要，该村不但是许多旅人进出的黑落德辖区的重要枢纽。

2.Mt 8: 5-13) stresses the importance of the village as a crossroad for many travellers leaving and entering the Tetrarchy of Herod Antipas.

玛八5-13）强调村庄的重要，该村不但是许多旅人进出的黑落德辖区的重要枢纽。

3.During the tetrarchy, power was shared among four leaders to stabilize the empire.

在四人统治期间，权力在四位领导者之间共享，以稳定帝国。

4.The tetrarchy aimed to provide more efficient governance and defense against external threats.

为了更有效地治理和防御外部威胁，四人统治的目标是提供更高效的治理。

5.The Roman Empire was divided into a system known as tetrarchy, which means 'rule by four'.

罗马帝国被划分为一个称为四人统治的系统，意思是'四人统治'。

6.Each ruler in the tetrarchy governed a specific region of the empire.

在四人统治中，每位统治者负责管理帝国的特定区域。

7.The concept of tetrarchy was introduced by Emperor Diocletian in the late 3rd century.

在公元3世纪末，戴克里先皇帝引入了四人统治的概念。

作文

The term tetrarchy refers to a political system in which power is divided among four individuals. This concept originated during the Roman Empire, particularly under the rule of Emperor Diocletian in the late third century AD. Diocletian recognized that the vastness of the Roman Empire made it increasingly difficult to govern effectively from a single center of power. As a solution, he established the tetrarchy as a means to decentralize authority and improve administrative efficiency.In the tetrarchy, the empire was divided into four regions, each ruled by a leader known as a 'tetrarch.' These leaders were responsible for maintaining order and implementing policies within their respective territories. The system consisted of two senior emperors, called Augusti, and two junior emperors, known as Caesares. This hierarchical structure allowed for a balanced distribution of power and enabled the rulers to respond more swiftly to local issues and threats.The implementation of the tetrarchy marked a significant shift in the governance of the Roman Empire. It aimed to address the challenges posed by external invasions, internal strife, and economic instability. By dividing responsibilities among four rulers, Diocletian hoped to create a more stable and resilient government. Each tetrarch had the autonomy to make decisions tailored to their region's unique circumstances, which helped mitigate the risks associated with centralized power.However, the tetrarchy also faced its share of challenges. The division of power sometimes led to conflicts and rivalries among the tetrarchs. As the leaders vied for dominance, the unity that the system aimed to achieve began to wane. After Diocletian's abdication in 305 AD, the tetrarchy struggled to maintain cohesion, ultimately leading to civil wars and the eventual collapse of this political arrangement.Despite its eventual downfall, the tetrarchy remains a fascinating example of innovative governance in ancient history. It illustrates the complexities of managing a vast empire and the lengths to which leaders would go to ensure stability. The lessons learned from the tetrarchy continue to resonate in modern political discourse, where the balance of power and the distribution of authority are still pertinent issues.In contemporary contexts, the notion of tetrarchy can be applied metaphorically to various organizational structures. For instance, modern businesses or governments may adopt similar models by distributing leadership roles among multiple individuals to enhance efficiency and responsiveness. The principles behind the tetrarchy can serve as a guide for creating collaborative environments where diverse perspectives contribute to decision-making processes.In conclusion, the term tetrarchy encapsulates a pivotal moment in the history of governance. By analyzing its successes and failures, we gain valuable insights into the dynamics of power sharing and the importance of adaptability in leadership. Understanding the tetrarchy not only enriches our knowledge of Roman history but also informs contemporary discussions about effective governance and organizational management.

“tetrarchy”一词指的是一种政治体系，其中权力分为四个个体。这一概念起源于罗马帝国，特别是在公元三世纪晚期的戴克里先皇帝统治时期。戴克里先意识到，罗马帝国的广阔使得从单一权力中心有效治理变得越来越困难。作为解决方案，他建立了tetrarchy，以实现权力的分散，提高行政效率。在tetrarchy中，帝国被划分为四个地区，每个地区由一个称为“tetrarch”的领导者负责。这些领导者负责维护秩序和实施政策。该系统由两个高级皇帝，即奥古斯都（Augusti），和两个初级皇帝，即凯撒（Caesares）组成。这种等级结构允许权力的平衡分配，使统治者能够更迅速地应对地方问题和威胁。tetrarchy的实施标志着罗马帝国治理的一次重大转变。它旨在应对外部入侵、内部冲突和经济不稳定所带来的挑战。通过在四位统治者之间分配责任，戴克里先希望创造一个更稳定、更有韧性的政府。每位tetrarch都有自主权，可以根据各自地区的独特情况做出决策，这有助于减轻集中权力所带来的风险。然而，tetrarchy也面临着一系列挑战。权力的分割有时导致了tetrarch之间的冲突和竞争。随着领导者争夺主导地位，该体系旨在实现的统一开始减弱。在戴克里先于公元305年退位后，tetrarchy难以维持凝聚力，最终导致内战及这一政治安排的崩溃。尽管最终失败，tetrarchy仍然是古代历史中创新治理的一个迷人例子。它展示了管理一个庞大帝国的复杂性，以及领导者为确保稳定而采取的极端措施。从tetrarchy中学到的教训在现代政治话语中仍然具有共鸣，在那里，权力的平衡和权威的分配仍然是相关问题。在当代背景下，“tetrarchy”的概念可以比喻性地应用于各种组织结构。例如，现代企业或政府可能会通过在多个个体之间分配领导角色来采用类似模型，以增强效率和响应能力。tetrarchy背后的原则可以作为创建协作环境的指南，在这些环境中，多样化的视角有助于决策过程。总之，tetrarchy一词概括了治理历史上的一个关键时刻。通过分析其成功与失败，我们获得了关于权力分享动态和领导适应性重要性的宝贵见解。理解tetrarchy不仅丰富了我们对罗马历史的认识，也为当代有效治理和组织管理的讨论提供了启示。