reductive

简明释义

英[rɪˈdʌktɪv]美[rɪˈdʌktɪv]

adj. 还原的；减少的

n. [助剂] 还原剂

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The coke phenomena have been discussed in the reductive atmosphere on different temperatures.

讨论了不同的炉温下，在还原性气氛的条件下的结焦现象。

2.It is proved that the polynomial normal operators have the property (p) and the polynomial normal reductive operators must be normal operators.

本文证明了多项式正常算子具有性质(P)和多项式正常的约化算子必为正常算子。

3.Luckily, MO 'r has a reductive way of thinking so the excrescent sequences were simplified greatly.

幸运的是MOR有还原想法的方法，因此多余的序列很简便就被去除了。

4.Major factors considered were key enzyme induction, degradation, inactivation, recovery, and the role of energy in terms of reductive potentials.

主要影响因素包括关键酶的诱导合成、老化降解、毒性失活、自我恢复、以及能量的调节作用等。

5.The explosive images and conjunctions, often contradictory, are reductive and then romantic .

这些爆发性的意象和结合常常相互矛盾，支离破碎而又富于浪漫色彩。

6.It could reasonably be classified either way, but I will generally assimilate it with the non-reductive class.

可以合理归类为任何一条路，但是我一般归入非还原类。

7.Many critiques of the book pointed out its reductive characterizations of cultures.

许多对这本书的批评指出了它对文化的简化刻画。

8.His analysis was too reductive, failing to capture the complexity of the issue.

他的分析过于简化，未能捕捉到问题的复杂性。

9.Using a reductive approach can sometimes lead to misunderstandings in science.

使用简化的方法有时会导致科学上的误解。

10.The teacher warned against reductive thinking when discussing historical events.

老师警告在讨论历史事件时要避免简化思维。

11.The film's portrayal of relationships was criticized as being overly reductive.

这部电影对人际关系的描绘被批评为过于简化。

作文

In the realm of art and literature, the concept of reduction often plays a significant role. Many artists and writers strive to convey complex ideas and emotions through simple forms and structures. However, this approach can sometimes lead to what is known as reductive thinking. Reductive thinking refers to the oversimplification of complex issues, reducing them to their most basic elements without acknowledging the nuances that make them rich and multifaceted. This can be particularly problematic in discussions surrounding culture, identity, and social issues, where the depth of human experience cannot be captured by simplistic narratives.For instance, consider the portrayal of cultural identities in media. Often, characters from diverse backgrounds are depicted using stereotypes that are reductive in nature. These characters become mere caricatures, stripped of their individuality and complexity. Such representations not only misinform audiences but also perpetuate harmful biases and misunderstandings. When we reduce individuals to a single characteristic or stereotype, we fail to appreciate the vast array of experiences that shape their identities.Moreover, in academic discourse, reductive approaches can limit our understanding of intricate theories and concepts. For example, when discussing psychological phenomena, some researchers may choose to focus solely on biological factors, ignoring the social and environmental influences that contribute to human behavior. This narrow view can lead to incomplete conclusions and hinder the development of comprehensive solutions to psychological issues.The danger of reductive thinking is evident in various fields, including politics and economics. Policy debates often suffer from oversimplification, where complex problems like poverty or healthcare are distilled into single causes or solutions. Politicians may propose reductive solutions that fail to address the underlying systemic issues, resulting in ineffective policies that do not bring about real change. For instance, suggesting that education alone can solve poverty ignores the multitude of factors at play, such as economic inequality, access to resources, and social support systems.In contrast, embracing complexity allows for a more nuanced understanding of the world. By recognizing the interconnectedness of various factors, we can develop more effective strategies for addressing the challenges we face. This requires a willingness to engage with ambiguity and uncertainty, rather than seeking quick fixes or simple explanations. In literature, authors who delve into the complexities of human experience often create works that resonate deeply with readers, inviting them to reflect on their own lives and beliefs.Ultimately, the challenge lies in balancing the need for clarity with the recognition of complexity. While it is tempting to seek reductive explanations, doing so can lead to misunderstandings and missed opportunities for growth. As we navigate the intricacies of our world, let us strive to embrace the richness of human experience, allowing our discussions and representations to reflect the depth and diversity that exists within it. By resisting the urge to simplify, we can foster a more inclusive and compassionate society that values every individual's story and perspective.

在艺术和文学领域，简化的概念往往扮演着重要角色。许多艺术家和作家努力通过简单的形式和结构来传达复杂的思想和情感。然而，这种方法有时会导致所谓的简化的思维。简化的思维是指对复杂问题的过度简化，将其减少到最基本的元素，而不承认使其丰富而多面的细微差别。这在涉及文化、身份和社会问题的讨论中尤其成问题，因为人类经验的深度无法通过简单的叙述来捕捉。例如，考虑媒体中对文化身份的描绘。通常，来自不同背景的角色使用刻板印象进行描绘，这些刻板印象本质上是简化的。这些角色变成了简单的漫画形象，被剥夺了个性和复杂性。这种表现不仅误导观众，还助长了有害的偏见和误解。当我们将个体简化为单一特征或刻板印象时，我们未能欣赏塑造他们身份的广泛经历。此外，在学术话语中，简化的方法可能限制我们对复杂理论和概念的理解。例如，在讨论心理现象时，一些研究者可能选择仅关注生物因素，而忽视影响人类行为的社会和环境因素。这种狭隘的观点可能导致结论不完整，并阻碍全面解决心理问题的发展。简化的思维的危险在政治和经济等各个领域都显而易见。政策辩论常常因过度简化而受到影响，复杂问题如贫困或医疗保健被浓缩为单一原因或解决方案。政治家可能提出简化的解决方案，未能解决潜在的系统性问题，导致无效的政策，无法带来真正的变化。例如，仅建议教育可以解决贫困问题，忽视了诸如经济不平等、资源获取和社会支持系统等多重因素。相比之下，接受复杂性允许我们对世界有更细致的理解。通过认识到各种因素的相互关联性，我们可以制定更有效的策略来应对我们面临的挑战。这需要愿意与模糊性和不确定性打交道，而不是寻求快速解决方案或简单解释。在文学中，深入探讨人类经验复杂性的作者往往创作出深深共鸣读者的作品，邀请他们反思自己的生活和信仰。最终，挑战在于平衡清晰性需求与复杂性认识之间。虽然寻求简化的解释是诱人的，但这样做可能导致误解和错失成长的机会。当我们在复杂的世界中航行时，让我们努力拥抱人类经验的丰富性，让我们的讨论和表现反映出其中存在的深度和多样性。通过抵制简化的冲动，我们可以培养一个更加包容和富有同情心的社会，重视每个个体的故事和视角。