disestablish

简明释义

英[ˌdɪsɪˈstæblɪʃ]美[ˌdɪsɪˈstæblɪʃ]

v. 废除（教会或宗教的）国教制

第 三 人 称 单 数 d i s e s t a b l i s h e s

现 在 分 词 d i s e s t a b l i s h i n g

过 去 式 d i s e s t a b l i s h e d

过 去 分 词 d i s e s t a b l i s h e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It would be right to disestablish the church.

废除此教会的国教地位将是正确的。

2.It would be right to disestablish the church.

废除此教会的国教地位将是正确的。

3.The proposal aims to disestablish the current educational system in favor of a more inclusive approach.

该提案旨在废除当前的教育系统，以支持更具包容性的方法。

4.The new law will disestablish the previous regulations that limited business growth.

新法律将废除限制商业增长的先前规定。

5.Many activists worked tirelessly to disestablish the oppressive regime.

许多活动家不懈努力以推翻压迫政权。

6.Efforts to disestablish the monarchy have been ongoing for decades.

努力废除君主制的行动已持续数十年。

7.The government decided to disestablish the state church, allowing for greater religious freedom.

政府决定解散国教，以允许更大的宗教自由。

作文

The concept of disestablishment has played a significant role in the history of governance and religion in various societies. To disestablish means to end the official status of an established church or to separate it from the state. This idea has been particularly prominent in discussions surrounding the relationship between religion and government, especially in countries where a particular faith has been endorsed by the state. The implications of disestablish are profound, as they often lead to debates about freedom of religion, the role of the church in public life, and the rights of individuals to practice their beliefs without interference from the state.Historically, one of the most notable examples of disestablishment occurred in England during the 19th century. The Church of England was the established church, meaning it received financial support from the government and had certain privileges that other religious groups did not. However, as society evolved and secularism began to take root, many argued that this arrangement was unfair and violated the principle of religious equality. The movement to disestablish the Church of England gained momentum, ultimately leading to significant changes in the relationship between church and state.In the United States, the First Amendment to the Constitution embodies the principle of disestablishment. It prohibits the establishment of a national religion and ensures that the government remains neutral in matters of faith. This legal framework has allowed for a diverse range of religious practices to flourish without fear of governmental interference. However, the interpretation of what it means to disestablish a religion continues to evolve, as new challenges arise in a rapidly changing society.The debate over disestablishment is not limited to historical contexts; it remains relevant today. Many countries still grapple with the presence of established churches and the implications of their status. For instance, in some European nations, the state financially supports certain religious institutions, raising questions about fairness and equality among different faiths. Critics argue that such arrangements can lead to favoritism and undermine the principle of disestablishment, while supporters contend that these traditions are part of the cultural heritage and should be preserved.Furthermore, the rise of secularism and the increasing number of individuals identifying as non-religious have sparked discussions about the future of established churches. As society becomes more diverse, the need for a clear separation between church and state becomes more pressing. Advocates for disestablishment argue that it is essential for fostering an inclusive environment where all individuals, regardless of their beliefs, can coexist peacefully.In conclusion, the term disestablish carries significant weight in discussions about the intersection of religion and government. Its historical roots and contemporary relevance highlight the ongoing struggle for religious freedom and equality. As societies continue to evolve, the principles behind disestablishment will undoubtedly remain a focal point in the quest for a fair and just society. Understanding this concept is crucial for anyone interested in the dynamics of power, belief, and the role of institutions in shaping our world.

“解散”这一概念在各种社会的治理和宗教历史中发挥了重要作用。解散的意思是结束一个建立的教会的官方地位或将其与国家分开。这个想法在围绕宗教与政府关系的讨论中尤为突出，尤其是在某些国家，特定信仰得到了国家的支持。解散的含义深远，因为它们常常引发关于宗教自由、教会在公共生活中的角色以及个人在不受国家干预的情况下实践信仰的权利的辩论。从历史上看，最显著的解散例子之一发生在19世纪的英格兰。英格兰教会是建立的教会，这意味着它得到了政府的财政支持，并享有其他宗教团体没有的特权。然而，随着社会的发展和世俗主义的根植，许多人争辩说这种安排是不公平的，违反了宗教平等的原则。解散英格兰教会的运动逐渐获得动力，最终导致了教会与国家关系的重大变化。在美国，宪法第一修正案体现了解散的原则。它禁止建立国家宗教，并确保政府在信仰问题上保持中立。这一法律框架使各种宗教实践能够在没有政府干预的情况下蓬勃发展。然而，随着新挑战的出现，如何解释解散宗教的意义仍在不断演变。关于解散的辩论并不仅限于历史背景；它在今天仍然相关。许多国家仍在努力应对建立教会的存在及其地位的影响。例如，在一些欧洲国家，国家财政支持某些宗教机构，引发了关于不同信仰之间公平性和平等性的问题。批评者认为，这种安排可能导致偏袒，破坏了解散的原则，而支持者则认为这些传统是文化遗产的一部分，应予以保留。此外，世俗主义的兴起和越来越多的人认同为非宗教信仰者引发了关于建立教会未来的讨论。随着社会变得更加多样化，教会与国家之间明确的分离需求变得更加紧迫。解散的倡导者认为，这对于促进一个包容的环境至关重要，在这个环境中，所有人，无论其信仰如何，都可以和平共处。总之，术语解散在讨论宗教与政府交叉点时具有重要意义。它的历史根源和当代相关性突显了对宗教自由和平等的持续斗争。随着社会的不断演变，解散背后的原则无疑将继续成为追求公正和公平社会的焦点。理解这一概念对任何对权力、信仰及机构在塑造我们世界中的作用感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。