polemics

简明释义

英[pəˈlemɪks]美[pəˈlemɪks]

n. 辩论术；论证法（polemic 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In Spain it's just different, because there are less polemics'.

在西班牙就不同，人们对此很少抱怨。

2.To avoid polemics, can you just tell us if it is true?

为了避免争论，你只要告诉我们，如果这是真的吗？

3.In recent years our feeding habits have been the focus of ongoing polemics.

最近几年人类的饮食习惯正成为争论的焦点。

4.Polemics is not good for F1 and particularly for the public because F1 is a fantastic sport that has to be relaunched, not only protected, " he said."

“论战对F1没有好处，尤其是对公众，因为F1是一个绝妙的运动，它必须重新出发，而不仅仅是将它保护起来，”他说。

5.I spoke to Diego Della Valle, Fiorentina were impeccable with us, no one made polemics against Milan, but let's not talk about the past.

我跟迭戈·德拉瓦莱谈过，佛罗伦萨跟我们关系很好，没人对米兰有争论。但请让我们别再谈论过去的事情了。

6.The modes of propaganda are opportunistic and the polemics can be vicious.

宣传的模式是投机取巧的，诡辩是可恶性的。

7.He enjoys polemics, persuasion, and controversy.

他喜欢辩论、说服和争议。

8.The debate quickly devolved into polemics, with both sides hurling insults instead of arguments.

辩论很快演变成了争论，双方开始互相指责而不是提出论点。

9.In political discourse, polemics often overshadow rational discussion.

在政治话语中，争论往往掩盖理性的讨论。

10.The article was filled with polemics that polarized public opinion.

这篇文章充满了导致公众舆论两极化的争论。

11.The professor's lecture on polemics in literature sparked an engaging conversation among students.

教授关于文学中争论的讲座引发了学生们的热烈讨论。

12.His book is a fascinating study of the polemics surrounding climate change.

他的书是对气候变化相关的争论的一个迷人研究。

作文

In today's world, we often find ourselves surrounded by heated debates and discussions on various topics, ranging from politics to social issues. These discussions can sometimes escalate into what is known as polemics, which refers to the art of engaging in contentious arguments or disputes. The term originates from the Greek word 'polemikos,' meaning 'warlike' or 'hostile.' In essence, polemics involves not just the exchange of ideas but also the confrontation of opposing views with the intent to persuade or refute. The role of polemics in society cannot be underestimated. It serves as a catalyst for change, prompting individuals and communities to examine their beliefs and values critically. For instance, during the civil rights movement in the United States, leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X engaged in polemics to challenge the status quo and advocate for equality. Their powerful rhetoric and passionate arguments ignited discussions that ultimately led to significant social reforms.However, polemics can also have negative connotations. When discussions become overly aggressive or personal, they can lead to division and hostility rather than constructive dialogue. In recent years, social media has amplified this phenomenon, allowing individuals to engage in polemics with little regard for civility or respect. Online platforms often encourage echo chambers, where people only interact with those who share their views, further entrenching divisions and polarizing opinions.To navigate the complex landscape of polemics, it is essential to approach discussions with an open mind and a willingness to listen. Engaging in healthy debate requires not only the ability to articulate one's own perspective but also the humility to consider opposing viewpoints. This balance is crucial in fostering an environment where polemics can lead to meaningful exchanges rather than destructive conflicts.In academic settings, polemics plays a vital role in the pursuit of knowledge. Scholars often engage in rigorous debates over theories and interpretations, pushing the boundaries of understanding in their fields. This intellectual polemics drives progress and innovation, as new ideas emerge from the clash of differing opinions. It is through these scholarly confrontations that we can refine our thoughts and develop more nuanced perspectives.In conclusion, while polemics can be a powerful tool for advocacy and intellectual growth, it is essential to wield it responsibly. By fostering respectful dialogue and embracing diverse viewpoints, we can ensure that polemics serves as a positive force in society. Ultimately, the goal should be to promote understanding and collaboration, rather than division and conflict. As we continue to engage in discussions about pressing issues, let us strive to elevate our conversations and use polemics as a means to bridge gaps rather than widen them.

在当今世界，我们常常发现自己被各种话题的激烈辩论和讨论所包围，涉及从政治到社会问题的方方面面。这些讨论有时会升级为我们所称之为论战的状态，这指的是参与争议性论证或争辩的艺术。该术语源于希腊词“polemikos”，意思是“好斗的”或“敌对的”。从本质上讲，论战不仅涉及思想的交流，而且还涉及对立观点的对抗，旨在劝说或反驳。论战在社会中的角色不可小觑。它作为变革的催化剂，促使个人和社区批判性地审视他们的信仰和价值观。例如，在美国的民权运动期间，马丁·路德·金和马尔科姆·X等领导者参与了论战，以挑战现状并倡导平等。他们强有力的修辞和充满激情的论点点燃了讨论，最终导致了重大的社会改革。然而，论战也可能具有负面含义。当讨论变得过于激烈或个人化时，它们可能导致分裂和敌意，而不是建设性的对话。近年来，社交媒体加剧了这一现象，使个人能够参与论战而不考虑礼貌或尊重。在线平台往往鼓励回声室，人们只与那些分享自己观点的人互动，进一步加深了分歧和意见极化。为了在复杂的论战环境中导航，至关重要的是以开放的心态和倾听的意愿来接近讨论。参与健康的辩论不仅需要能够清晰表达自己的观点，还需要谦逊地考虑对立的观点。这种平衡对于营造一个可以让论战引导有意义交流而非破坏性冲突的环境至关重要。在学术环境中，论战在追求知识中发挥着重要作用。学者们经常就理论和解释进行激烈辩论，推动各自领域理解的边界。这种知识性的论战推动进步和创新，因为新思想从不同意见的碰撞中涌现。正是在这些学术对抗中，我们才能精炼思想，发展更细致的观点。总之，虽然论战可以成为倡导和智力成长的强大工具，但负责任地使用它至关重要。通过促进尊重的对话和拥抱多样化的观点，我们可以确保论战成为社会中的积极力量。最终，目标应该是促进理解和合作，而不是分裂和冲突。当我们继续就紧迫问题进行讨论时，让我们努力提升我们的对话，并利用论战作为弥合差距而不是扩大差距的手段。