incriminate

简明释义

英[ɪnˈkrɪmɪneɪt]美[ɪnˈkrɪmɪneɪt]

vt. 控告；暗示……有罪

第 三 人 称 单 数 i n c r i m i n a t e s

现 在 分 词 i n c r i m i n a t i n g

过 去 式 i n c r i m i n a t e d

过 去 分 词 i n c r i m i n a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Citizens can learn how to avoid arrest both on the street and when pulled over in a vehicle and are alerted to basic tricks cops use to get people to incriminate themselves.

公民可以学习如何避免在街上被捕时都在拉车，并通知了警察的基本技巧的使用让人们连累自己。

2.Citizens can learn how to avoid arrest both on the street and when pulled over in a vehicle and are alerted to basic tricks cops use to get people to incriminate themselves.

公民可以学习如何避免在街上被捕时都在拉车，并通知了警察的基本技巧的使用让人们连累自己。

3.He claimed that the drugs had been planted to incriminate him.

他声称那些毒品是有人为了栽赃陷害他而放在那里的。

4.He always protested his innocence and claimed that the drugs had been planted to incriminate him.

他一直坚称自己是清白的，声称毒品是有人放置要栽赃于他。

5.The youths were arrested and searched for anything that would incriminate them.

警察逮捕了那些年轻人，并进行搜身，看能不能找到可以认定他们有罪的物证。

6.The lawyer advised his client not to speak, as anything he said could incriminate him.

律师建议他的客户不要说话，因为他说的任何话都可能使他有罪。

7.She refused to answer questions that might incriminate her during the police interrogation.

在警方审讯期间，她拒绝回答可能会使她有罪的问题。

8.The evidence found at the crime scene could potentially incriminate him in the robbery.

犯罪现场发现的证据可能会使他有罪于这起抢劫案。

9.They found documents that could incriminate the company in illegal activities.

他们发现的文件可能会使公司有罪于非法活动。

10.His confession could incriminate others involved in the scheme.

他的供述可能会使其他参与该计划的人有罪。

作文

In today's society, the concept of justice is often intertwined with the idea of truth. However, the pursuit of truth can sometimes lead to situations where individuals feel pressured to incriminate themselves or others. The term incriminate refers to the act of making someone appear guilty of a crime or wrongdoing, and it raises important questions about morality, ethics, and the legal system. In many cases, people are caught in a dilemma where they must choose between protecting themselves and being honest. Consider the case of a witness to a crime. This individual may have vital information that could help law enforcement apprehend a suspect. However, sharing this information could potentially incriminate the witness if they were involved in any way, even if it was unintentional. The fear of self-incrimination can lead to silence, allowing criminals to evade justice. This situation highlights the importance of legal protections such as the Fifth Amendment in the United States, which grants individuals the right to refuse to answer questions that could incriminate them. Moreover, the pressure to incriminate others can also be significant. In high-stakes situations, individuals may feel compelled to provide evidence against someone else to save themselves. This can create a toxic environment where trust is eroded, and relationships are damaged. For instance, in corporate settings, employees may find themselves in situations where they must decide whether to report unethical behavior by a colleague. The fear of incriminate repercussions can deter individuals from coming forward, perpetuating a culture of silence and complicity. Furthermore, the media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception around the idea of incrimination. Sensationalized news stories often focus on the idea of guilt before a fair trial has taken place. This can lead to a rush to judgment, where individuals are labeled as criminals based on mere allegations. The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of justice, yet the pressure to incriminate can overshadow this principle, leading to public outcry and demands for punishment before all the facts are known. In conclusion, the act of incriminate carries significant weight in both personal and societal contexts. It raises ethical dilemmas about honesty, loyalty, and the pursuit of justice. As individuals navigate these complex situations, it is crucial to recognize the implications of their actions and the potential consequences of incriminate behavior. Ultimately, fostering an environment where truth can be pursued without fear of unjust repercussions is essential for a just society.

在当今社会，正义的概念常常与真相的理念交织在一起。然而，追求真相有时会导致个体感受到自我指控或他人的压力。指控一词指的是使某人看起来有罪或错误的行为，它引发了关于道德、伦理和法律体系的重要问题。在许多情况下，人们陷入了一个困境，他们必须在保护自己和诚实之间做出选择。考虑一下目击犯罪的证人。这位个人可能拥有重要的信息，可以帮助执法部门逮捕嫌疑犯。然而，分享这些信息可能会指控证人，如果他们以任何方式参与，即使是无意的。自我指控的恐惧可能导致沉默，使罪犯逃避正义。这种情况突显了法律保护的重要性，例如美国的第五修正案，赋予个人拒绝回答可能指控他们的问题的权利。此外，指控他人的压力也可能很大。在高风险的情况下，个体可能会感到被迫提供证据来对抗他人，以拯救自己。这可能会创造出一种有毒的环境，信任被侵蚀，关系受到损害。例如，在企业环境中，员工可能发现自己身处必须决定是否举报同事不道德行为的情况。指控后果的恐惧可能会阻止个体挺身而出，从而延续沉默和共谋的文化。此外，媒体在塑造公众对指控这一概念的看法方面发挥着至关重要的作用。耸人听闻的新闻故事往往专注于在公正审判之前的有罪观念。这可能导致匆忙下判断，个人在仅仅基于指控的情况下被贴上罪犯的标签。无罪推定是正义的基本原则，然而，指控的压力可能会掩盖这一原则，导致公众愤怒和对惩罚的要求，而没有了解所有事实。总之，指控的行为在个人和社会背景中都具有重要意义。它引发了关于诚实、忠诚和追求正义的伦理困境。当个体在这些复杂的情况下航行时，认识到他们行为的影响及其指控行为的潜在后果至关重要。最终，营造一个可以在没有不公正后果恐惧的情况下追求真理的环境，对于一个公正的社会至关重要。