misprision

简明释义

英[mɪsˈprɪʒən]美[mɪsˈprɪʒən]

n. 渎职；蔑视；玩忽职守；[法] 知情不报

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Practically, the factor as the absence and reduction of procuratorial power lead to the ineffectiveness of investigation and punishment on misprision crimes.

实践中检察机关由于职权缺位和职权弱化等原因，造成渎职侵权犯罪查办和惩治不力。

2.Practically, the factor as the absence and reduction of procuratorial power lead to the ineffectiveness of investigation and punishment on misprision crimes.

实践中检察机关由于职权缺位和职权弱化等原因，造成渎职侵权犯罪查办和惩治不力。

3.As one of the serious official misconduct crime, misprision is attacked by each authority at anytime.

玩忽职守罪是渎职犯罪的一种，其社会危害性相当严重。

4.From our past experience, this kind of overseas marketing is most likely to retain local misprision profits.

从我们过去的经验，这样的海外市场是最有可能保留地方隐匿利润。

5.The detective believed that the witness's silence was a clear case of misprision 误判.

侦探认为证人的沉默显然是一起misprision 误判案件。

6.The lawyer argued that his client's actions were not a case of misprision 误判, but rather a misunderstanding of the law.

律师辩称，他的客户的行为不是一起misprision 误判，而是对法律的误解。

7.In some jurisdictions, failing to report a crime can lead to charges of misprision 误判.

在某些司法管辖区，未能报告犯罪可能会导致misprision 误判的指控。

8.During the trial, the prosecutor highlighted instances of misprision 误判 among the accused.

在审判期间，检察官强调了被告中存在的misprision 误判实例。

9.He was charged with misprision 误判 after failing to report the illegal activities he witnessed.

他因未能报告目击到的非法活动而被控以misprision 误判。

作文

In a world filled with complexities and moral dilemmas, the concept of misprision becomes increasingly relevant. Misprision refers to the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge about a crime or wrongdoing. It is not merely ignorance or negligence; rather, it signifies an active choice to ignore or hide information that could lead to justice. This notion raises significant ethical questions about our responsibilities as individuals in society. Consider a scenario where a person witnesses a robbery but chooses not to report it out of fear or indifference. This act of silence can be classified as misprision. The witness's failure to act not only enables the perpetrator to escape justice but also undermines the safety and trust within the community. By failing to report the crime, the witness contributes to a culture of impunity, where wrongdoers feel emboldened to continue their illicit activities without fear of consequence.The implications of misprision extend beyond individual actions; they permeate institutions and systems. In many cases, organizations may become complicit in misprision by covering up scandals or unethical practices to protect their reputation. For example, when corporate leaders choose to overlook financial misconduct within their ranks, they perpetuate a cycle of dishonesty that can have devastating effects on employees, stakeholders, and the economy at large. Such decisions reflect a prioritization of profit over principles, leading to widespread distrust in institutions that are meant to uphold ethical standards.Moreover, misprision can manifest in governmental contexts as well. When officials fail to report corruption or misconduct within their agencies, they betray the public trust. This form of misprision can erode democratic values and create an environment where accountability is absent. Citizens may become disillusioned with their leaders, feeling that their voices are ignored and that justice is unattainable. This disconnection can lead to apathy, further entrenching the very issues that misprision seeks to highlight.However, it is essential to recognize that combating misprision requires more than just individual accountability; it demands a cultural shift towards transparency and integrity. Education plays a crucial role in this transformation. By fostering an environment where individuals feel empowered to speak out against wrongdoing, we can diminish the prevalence of misprision. Schools and communities should encourage open discussions about ethics and the importance of reporting wrongdoing, emphasizing that silence can have dire consequences.In conclusion, misprision is a multifaceted issue that poses significant challenges to our moral fabric. Whether in personal interactions, corporate environments, or governmental institutions, the choice to remain silent in the face of wrongdoing can have far-reaching implications. As members of society, we must strive to cultivate a culture that values honesty and accountability, ensuring that we do not fall into the trap of misprision. By doing so, we not only uphold justice but also contribute to a safer and more equitable world for all.

在一个充满复杂性和道德困境的世界中，“misprision”这一概念显得愈发重要。Misprision指的是故意隐瞒对犯罪或不当行为的知识。这不仅仅是无知或疏忽，而是指选择性地忽视或隐藏可能导致正义的信息。这一概念引发了关于我们作为社会个体责任的重要伦理问题。考虑这样一个场景：一个人目睹了一起抢劫，但出于恐惧或冷漠选择不报警。这种沉默的行为可以被归类为misprision。目击者未能采取行动，不仅使犯罪者逃避了正义，还削弱了社区内的安全感和信任。通过未能报告犯罪，目击者助长了一种有罪不罚的文化，使得违法者在没有后果的情况下肆无忌惮地继续其非法活动。Misprision的影响不仅限于个人行为；它还渗透到机构和系统中。在许多情况下，组织可能因掩盖丑闻或不道德行为以保护自身声誉而成为misprision的同谋。例如，当企业领导选择忽视内部的财务不当行为时，他们延续了一种不诚实的循环，这可能对员工、利益相关者和整个经济产生毁灭性的影响。这种决策反映了利润优先于原则的态度，导致公众对本应维护伦理标准的机构产生广泛的不信任。此外，misprision也可能在政府背景中体现。当官员未能报告自己机构内的腐败或不当行为时，他们背叛了公众的信任。这种形式的misprision可能会侵蚀民主价值观，造成缺乏问责制的环境。公民可能会对领导者感到失望，认为他们的声音被忽视，正义无法实现。这种脱节可能导致冷漠，进一步加深misprision所突显的问题。然而，必须认识到，打击misprision不仅需要个人的问责制，还需要向透明和诚信的文化转变。教育在这一转变中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过营造一个鼓励个体对不当行为发声的环境，我们可以减少misprision的普遍性。学校和社区应鼓励关于伦理和报告不当行为重要性的公开讨论，强调沉默可能带来的严重后果。总之，misprision是一个多层面的议题，对我们的道德基础构成了重大挑战。无论是在个人互动、企业环境还是政府机构中，在不当行为面前选择沉默的决定都可能产生深远的影响。作为社会的一员，我们必须努力培养一种重视诚实和问责的文化，确保我们不陷入misprision的陷阱。通过这样做，我们不仅维护了正义，还为所有人贡献了一个更安全、更公平的世界。