polemizing

简明释义

英[ˈpɒl.ə.maɪ.zɪŋ]美[ˈpoʊ.ləˌmaɪ.zɪŋ]

v. 争论；辩论

第 三 人 称 单 数 p o l e m i z e s

现 在 分 词 p o l e m i z i n g

过 去 式 p o l e m i z e d

过 去 分 词 p o l e m i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The debate quickly turned into a polemizing session as both sides defended their viewpoints passionately.

辩论很快变成了一场争论，双方都热情地捍卫自己的观点。

2.She is often criticized for polemizing rather than seeking common ground.

她经常因为争论而不是寻求共同点而受到批评。

3.He enjoys polemizing with his friends over current political issues.

他喜欢和朋友们就当前政治问题进行争论。

4.In her article, she spent several paragraphs polemizing about the ethical implications of artificial intelligence.

在她的文章中，她花了几段时间争论人工智能的伦理影响。

5.The professor was known for polemizing against outdated theories in his lectures.

这位教授以在讲座中抨击过时理论而闻名。

作文

In today's world, where opinions are as diverse as the people who hold them, polemizing has become a common practice in various fields, from politics to social media. The act of polemizing, which refers to engaging in controversial debate or dispute, often serves as a catalyst for discussions that can lead to significant change. However, it is essential to consider both the positive and negative aspects of this practice. On one hand, polemizing can promote critical thinking and encourage individuals to examine their beliefs more closely. For instance, when public figures engage in polemizing over policies or ideologies, they often bring attention to issues that might otherwise be overlooked. This can lead to increased awareness and motivate others to take action. In this way, polemizing can serve as a powerful tool for social progress.Moreover, polemizing can foster a sense of community among those who share similar viewpoints. Online platforms allow individuals to connect with like-minded people, creating spaces where they can express their opinions freely. This sense of belonging can empower individuals to advocate for their causes more passionately. For example, movements such as Black Lives Matter have gained momentum through polemizing discussions that highlight systemic injustices. However, there is a darker side to polemizing that cannot be ignored. When debates escalate into hostile arguments, they can create division rather than unity. Social media, in particular, has amplified this issue, as anonymity allows individuals to engage in polemizing without facing the consequences of their words. This can lead to toxic environments where constructive dialogue is replaced by personal attacks and insults. Consequently, important conversations may become overshadowed by negativity, deterring people from participating in discussions altogether.Furthermore, polemizing often results in echo chambers, where individuals only hear opinions that align with their own. This phenomenon can hinder personal growth and understanding, as it limits exposure to differing perspectives. In a society that thrives on diversity, this can be detrimental. To combat this, it is crucial for individuals to approach polemizing with an open mind, willing to listen and learn from others, even when they disagree.In conclusion, while polemizing can be a valuable tool for sparking discussion and promoting change, it also has the potential to create conflict and division. It is vital for individuals to engage in polemizing responsibly, fostering an environment where respectful debate can flourish. By doing so, we can ensure that our conversations lead to growth and understanding rather than hostility and division. Ultimately, the way we choose to engage in polemizing will shape the discourse of our society and determine the impact we have on one another.

在当今世界，观点与持有观点的人一样多样化，polemizing（争论）已成为各个领域中一种常见的做法，从政治到社交媒体。polemizing这一行为，指的是参与有争议的辩论或争论，通常作为促进讨论的催化剂，这些讨论可以导致重要的变化。然而，考虑到这一做法的正面和负面方面至关重要。一方面，polemizing可以促进批判性思维，并鼓励个人更仔细地审视自己的信念。例如，当公众人物就政策或意识形态进行polemizing时，他们往往会引起人们对可能被忽视的问题的关注。这可以导致意识的提高，并激励其他人采取行动。通过这种方式，polemizing可以作为社会进步的强大工具。此外，polemizing可以在共享相似观点的人群中培养一种社区感。在线平台允许个人与志同道合的人联系，创造出自由表达意见的空间。这种归属感可以使个人更热情地倡导他们的事业。例如，像“黑人的命也是命”这样的运动通过揭示系统性不公正的polemizing讨论而获得了动力。然而，polemizing的阴暗面也不能被忽视。当辩论升级为敌对的争论时，它们可能会造成分裂而非团结。社交媒体尤其放大了这个问题，因为匿名性使个人能够参与polemizing而不必面对言语的后果。这可能导致有毒环境，在这些环境中，建设性的对话被人身攻击和侮辱所取代。因此，重要的对话可能被消极情绪所遮蔽，从而使人们完全不愿参与讨论。此外，polemizing往往导致回声室现象，在这种现象中，个人只听到与自己观点一致的意见。这种现象可能妨碍个人成长和理解，因为它限制了接触不同观点的机会。在一个依赖多样性的社会中，这可能是有害的。为了应对这一点，个人必须以开放的心态参与polemizing，愿意倾听并向他人学习，即使在意见不合的情况下。总之，尽管polemizing可以成为激发讨论和促进变革的宝贵工具，但它也有可能导致冲突和分裂。个人在参与polemizing时必须负责任地行事，营造一个尊重辩论能够蓬勃发展的环境。通过这样做，我们可以确保我们的对话带来成长和理解，而不是敌意和分裂。最终，我们选择如何参与polemizing将塑造我们社会的讨论，并决定我们对彼此的影响。