disinvestment

简明释义

英[ˌdɪsɪnˈvestmənt]美[ˌdɪsɪnˈvestmənt]

n. 收回投资；蚀本

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Ng believes that the individual property Wenzhou businessmen from Shanghai disinvestment, undeniable Wenzhou businessmen independence bell Shanghai market basic facts.

吴昊认为，温州商人从上海的个别楼盘撤资，否定不了温州客商独钟上海市场的基本事实。

2.According to the theory of game and information economics, the paper sets up a two-staged basic model, and gives conditions of disinvestment.

本文利用博弈论和信息经济学的理论知识，通过建立一个两阶段基本模型，给出了风险企业的退出条件。

3.Ng believes that the individual property Wenzhou businessmen from Shanghai disinvestment, undeniable Wenzhou businessmen independence bell Shanghai market basic facts.

吴昊认为，温州商人从上海的个别楼盘撤资，否定不了温州客商独钟上海市场的基本事实。

4.The company announced a major disinvestment in its overseas operations, reallocating funds to domestic projects.

该公司宣布对其海外业务进行重大撤资，将资金重新分配到国内项目。

5.After years of disinvestment, the community struggled to maintain its infrastructure.

经过多年的撤资，社区难以维持其基础设施。

6.The university's disinvestment from certain industries reflects its commitment to ethical investing.

该大学对某些行业的撤资反映了其对道德投资的承诺。

7.The government is facing criticism for its disinvestment in public health services during the pandemic.

政府因在疫情期间对公共卫生服务的撤资而面临批评。

8.Many investors are concerned about the potential disinvestment from fossil fuels in light of climate change.

鉴于气候变化，许多投资者对可能的化石燃料撤资感到担忧。

作文

In recent years, the concept of disinvestment has gained significant attention in both economic and social discussions. Disinvestment refers to the process of withdrawing investments from certain sectors, companies, or projects, often due to ethical concerns or financial performance issues. This practice can take many forms, including divesting from fossil fuels, tobacco, or companies that do not align with an investor's values. The motivations behind disinvestment can vary widely, but they often include a desire to promote sustainability, social justice, or to respond to public pressure. One of the most prominent examples of disinvestment is the movement against apartheid in South Africa during the 1980s. Activists called for universities, churches, and other institutions to divest from companies that operated in South Africa as a means of protesting the oppressive regime. This form of disinvestment was not only a financial strategy but also a powerful political statement that helped to raise awareness about human rights abuses. The success of this movement demonstrated how disinvestment could serve as a catalyst for social change, influencing both public opinion and policy. In contemporary society, the disinvestment movement has expanded to include environmental concerns. Many investors are now choosing to divest from fossil fuel companies in response to the urgent need to combat climate change. This trend is driven by the understanding that continued investment in fossil fuels is not only environmentally harmful but also poses significant financial risks as the world shifts towards renewable energy sources. By engaging in disinvestment, investors aim to send a clear message that they support sustainable practices and are unwilling to fund industries that threaten the planet’s future. Moreover, disinvestment can also be seen in the context of corporate responsibility. Consumers and shareholders alike are increasingly demanding that companies uphold ethical standards. As a result, organizations that fail to meet these expectations may face disinvestment from socially conscious investors. This shift highlights the growing importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in business practices today. Companies that prioritize ethical considerations are likely to attract more investment, while those that do not may find themselves facing financial repercussions. However, disinvestment is not without its challenges. Critics argue that simply withdrawing funds does not necessarily lead to positive outcomes and can sometimes harm the very communities that activists aim to protect. For instance, if investors pull out of a struggling company without offering alternatives, it may lead to job losses and economic decline in that area. Therefore, it is crucial for those engaging in disinvestment to consider the broader implications of their actions and seek to support sustainable alternatives. In conclusion, disinvestment is a multifaceted concept that reflects the evolving landscape of investment strategies and ethical considerations. As more individuals and organizations recognize the impact of their financial decisions, the practice of disinvestment will likely continue to grow. It serves as a reminder that investment is not just about financial returns; it is also about aligning one’s values with their financial choices. By understanding and engaging in disinvestment, we can contribute to a more sustainable and equitable future for all.

撤资这一概念近年来在经济和社会讨论中引起了显著关注。撤资是指从某些行业、公司或项目中撤回投资的过程，通常是出于道德考虑或财务表现问题。这一做法可以采取多种形式，包括从化石燃料、烟草或与投资者价值观不符的公司中撤资。撤资背后的动机各不相同，但通常包括促进可持续发展、社会正义或响应公众压力的愿望。 其中一个最突出的例子是1980年代反对南非种族隔离制度的运动。活动家呼吁大学、教会和其他机构撤资于在南非运营的公司，以此作为抗议压迫政权的手段。这种形式的撤资不仅是一种金融策略，也是一种强有力的政治声明，帮助提高了人们对人权侵犯的认识。这场运动的成功表明，撤资可以作为社会变革的催化剂，影响公众舆论和政策。 在当代社会，撤资运动扩展到了环境问题。许多投资者现在选择从化石燃料公司撤资，以应对迫切需要抗击气候变化的现实。这一趋势源于对继续投资化石燃料不仅对环境有害，而且在世界向可再生能源转型时可能面临重大财务风险的理解。通过参与撤资，投资者旨在发出明确的信息，即他们支持可持续实践，并且不愿意为威胁地球未来的行业提供资金。 此外，撤资还可以在企业责任的背景下进行讨论。消费者和股东越来越要求公司遵循道德标准。因此，未能满足这些期望的组织可能面临来自社会责任投资者的撤资。这一转变突显了企业社会责任（CSR）在当今商业实践中的重要性。优先考虑伦理考虑的公司更有可能吸引更多投资，而那些未能做到的公司则可能面临财务后果。 然而，撤资并非没有挑战。批评者认为，仅仅撤回资金并不一定导致积极结果，有时甚至可能损害活动家旨在保护的社区。例如，如果投资者在没有提供替代方案的情况下撤出一家挣扎中的公司，可能会导致失业和该地区的经济衰退。因此，参与撤资的人员必须考虑其行动的更广泛影响，并寻求支持可持续替代方案。 总之，撤资是一个多方面的概念，反映了投资策略和伦理考量的演变。随着越来越多的个人和组织认识到其财务决策的影响，撤资的做法可能会继续增长。它提醒我们，投资不仅仅关乎财务回报；它还关乎将个人的价值观与其财务选择相一致。通过理解和参与撤资，我们可以为所有人创造一个更可持续和公平的未来做出贡献。