satrapy

简明释义

英[ˈseɪtrəpi]美[ˈseɪtrəpi;ˈsætrəpi]

n. 总督管辖地区（或职务、任期）

复 数 s a t r a p i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In history, many empires relied on satrapies to manage their expansive territories efficiently.

在历史上，许多帝国依靠卫星省来有效管理其广阔的领土。

2.The governor acted like a king within his satrapy, enforcing laws and collecting taxes independently.

州长在他的卫星省内像国王一样行事，独立执行法律和征收税款。

3.The ancient Persian Empire was divided into several regions, each governed by a local leader known as a satrap, making the entire region a vast satrapy.

古波斯帝国被划分为几个地区，每个地区由一个地方领导者统治，这些地方领导者被称为卫星省，使整个地区成为一个庞大的

4.The rebellion in the satrapy forced the central government to send troops to restore order.

在卫星省的叛乱迫使中央政府派遣军队恢复秩序。

5.After the conquest, the new rulers established a satrapy to maintain control over the territory and its people.

征服后，新统治者建立了一个卫星省以维持对该领土及其人民的控制。

作文

The concept of a satrapy dates back to ancient Persia, where it referred to a province governed by a satrap, who was essentially a viceroy or a regional governor. The term has since evolved and is often used in modern contexts to describe any administrative region that operates under the authority of a central power while maintaining a degree of local autonomy. Understanding the historical significance of a satrapy can provide valuable insights into the dynamics of governance and territorial administration.In ancient Persia, the empire was vast, stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indus River. To efficiently manage such a large territory, the Persian kings established a system of satrapies, dividing the empire into manageable regions. Each satrapy was overseen by a satrap, who was responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining order, and ensuring loyalty to the king. This arrangement allowed the Persian Empire to maintain control over its diverse populations, each with its own customs and traditions.The role of a satrap was crucial; they acted as the king's representative and were tasked with implementing the central government's policies. However, the satraps also had significant power over their regions, which sometimes led to tensions between the central authority and local governance. For instance, some satraps became so powerful that they attempted to assert independence, leading to conflicts within the empire. This illustrates the delicate balance of power that exists in a satrapy, where local leaders must navigate their loyalty to the central authority while managing the affairs of their constituents.In contemporary discussions, the term satrapy can be applied metaphorically to describe political systems or organizations where local leaders exercise a measure of control under the overarching authority of a more powerful entity. For example, in corporate structures, a regional manager might operate like a satrap, making decisions for their area while still being accountable to the corporate headquarters. This parallel highlights how the principles of governance established in ancient times continue to resonate in modern administrative practices.Furthermore, the concept of a satrapy can also be examined through the lens of international relations. In geopolitical contexts, nations may exert influence over smaller states, creating a dynamic reminiscent of the ancient satrapies. These smaller nations, while nominally independent, may find themselves heavily reliant on the larger power for economic support or military protection, leading to a situation akin to a modern satrapy. This relationship can foster resentment and a desire for greater autonomy, mirroring the historical struggles faced by Persian satraps.In conclusion, the term satrapy encompasses both historical and contemporary implications regarding governance and authority. Its roots in the Persian Empire illustrate the complexities of managing diverse populations and the balance of power between central and local authorities. As we explore modern parallels, it becomes evident that the lessons learned from ancient satrapies are still relevant today, reminding us of the ongoing challenges in governance and the quest for autonomy in various political landscapes.

“卫星行省”这一概念可以追溯到古波斯，指的是由卫星统治的省份，卫星实际上是副王或地区总督。这个术语自此演变，常用于现代语境中，描述在中央权力下运作的任何行政区域，同时保持一定程度的地方自治。理解“卫星行省”的历史意义可以为我们提供关于治理和领土管理动态的宝贵见解。在古波斯，帝国辽阔，从地中海延伸到印度河。为了有效管理如此庞大的领土，波斯国王建立了“卫星行省”制度，将帝国划分为可管理的区域。每个“卫星行省”都由一位卫星监督，负责征收税款、维持秩序并确保对国王的忠诚。这种安排使波斯帝国能够控制其拥有各自习俗和传统的多样化人群。卫星的角色至关重要；他们充当国王的代表，负责实施中央政府的政策。然而，卫星对各自地区也拥有相当大的权力，这有时会导致中央权威与地方治理之间的紧张关系。例如，一些卫星变得如此强大，以至于试图宣称独立，导致帝国内部的冲突。这说明了在“卫星行省”中存在的微妙权力平衡，在这种情况下，地方领导者必须在对中央权威的忠诚与管理其选民事务之间进行权衡。在当代讨论中，“卫星行省”这个术语可以比喻性地应用于描述政治系统或组织，其中地方领导人在更强大的实体的主导下行使一定程度的控制。例如，在企业结构中，区域经理可能像卫星一样，为其地区做出决策，同时仍需向公司总部负责。这一类比强调了古代时期开创的治理原则在现代行政实践中继续产生共鸣。此外，从国际关系的角度来看，“卫星行省”的概念也可以进行审视。在地缘政治背景下，国家可能对较小的国家施加影响，形成一种类似于古代卫星行省的动态。这些较小的国家虽然名义上独立，但可能发现自己在经济支持或军事保护方面严重依赖于更大力量，导致一种类似现代“卫星行省”的局面。这种关系可能会滋生怨恨和对更大自主权的渴望，反映出波斯卫星所面临的历史斗争。总之，“卫星行省”这一术语涵盖了关于治理和权威的历史和当代含义。它在波斯帝国中的根源展示了管理多样化人口的复杂性以及中央与地方权力之间的平衡。当我们探索现代的类比时，可以明显看出，古代“卫星行省”所吸取的教训今天仍然具有相关性，提醒我们在各种政治环境中治理和追求自治的持续挑战。