preclusive

简明释义

[prɪˈkluːsɪv][prɪˈkluːsɪv]

adj. 妨碍的;除外的;预防的

英英释义

Serving to prevent or hinder something from happening.

用于防止或阻碍某事发生的。

单词用法

preclusive effect

排他性效应

preclusive clause

排他性条款

preclusive measures

排他性措施

preclusive nature

排他性特征

同义词

preventive

预防的

The preventive measures were put in place to avoid future issues.

采取了预防措施以避免未来的问题。

exclusive

排他的

The exclusive rights to the property were granted to a single developer.

该物业的排他性权利被授予给一个开发商。

prohibitive

禁止的

The prohibitive costs of the project limited its feasibility.

项目的高昂成本限制了其可行性。

disallowing

不允许的

The disallowing of certain activities was necessary for safety.

出于安全考虑,不允许某些活动是必要的。

反义词

inclusive

包容的

The inclusive nature of the community allows everyone to participate.

这个社区的包容性让每个人都能参与。

permissive

宽容的

A permissive environment encourages creativity and innovation.

宽容的环境鼓励创造力和创新。

例句

1.Preclusive types and corresponding linguistic form.

排除类型及其相应语形。

2.Preclusive types and corresponding linguistic form.

排除类型及其相应语形。

3.The contract contained a preclusive clause that prevented any future claims related to the project.

合同中包含了一项排除性的条款,禁止与该项目相关的任何未来索赔。

4.The judge ruled that the evidence presented was preclusive and could not be considered in the trial.

法官裁定所呈现的证据是排除性的,不能在审判中考虑。

5.Her failure to respond to the offer was seen as a preclusive action, eliminating her chance to negotiate.

她未能对报价作出回应被视为一种排除性行为,消除了她谈判的机会。

6.The policy was designed to be preclusive, ensuring that only eligible applicants could participate.

该政策旨在具有排除性,确保只有符合条件的申请者可以参与。

7.In legal terms, a preclusive ruling can prevent parties from relitigating issues that have already been decided.

在法律术语中,排除性裁决可以防止当事方重新审理已经决定的问题。

作文

In the realm of law, the term preclusive refers to a situation where a legal action is barred due to a previous judgment or decision. This concept is crucial in understanding how courts operate and how justice is served. For instance, when a case has been decided, the same issue cannot be litigated again in another court, as it would be considered preclusive to do so. This principle ensures that once a matter has been settled, parties cannot continue to argue the same points, thus promoting finality and efficiency in legal proceedings.The doctrine of res judicata, which translates to "a matter judged," embodies the idea of preclusive effects in legal contexts. It serves to protect the integrity of judicial decisions and to prevent the waste of resources on repeated litigation. If individuals were allowed to keep bringing the same issues to court, it would lead to chaos and undermine the authority of the judicial system.Moreover, the preclusive nature of certain judgments extends beyond just the parties involved in a case. It can impact third parties as well, particularly in cases where a decision may set a precedent. For example, if a court rules on a specific interpretation of a law, that ruling can be preclusive for similar cases in the future, guiding other courts in their decisions. This aspect of law illustrates how important it is for judges to carefully consider their rulings, as they can have far-reaching implications.In addition to the legal context, the term preclusive can also be applied in everyday life situations. For example, in personal relationships, certain actions or words can be preclusive to future discussions or reconciliations. If one partner consistently undermines the other, it can create an environment where open communication becomes impossible. The preclusive effect of such behavior can lead to the deterioration of trust and intimacy, ultimately resulting in the breakdown of the relationship.Understanding the concept of preclusive actions is vital not only in legal terms but also in interpersonal interactions. It emphasizes the importance of being mindful of our words and actions, as they can have lasting consequences. Just as in law, where a preclusive decision can close the door on future litigation, in relationships, certain behaviors can close off avenues for dialogue and resolution.In conclusion, the term preclusive encompasses a significant principle in both legal and personal contexts. In law, it serves to uphold the finality of judgments and prevent unnecessary litigation, while in personal relationships, it highlights the impact of our actions on future interactions. By recognizing the preclusive nature of our decisions, we can strive to foster environments that encourage open communication and mutual respect, whether in the courtroom or in our daily lives.

在法律领域,术语preclusive指的是由于先前的判决或决定而阻止某项法律行动的情况。这个概念对于理解法院的运作及公正的实现至关重要。例如,当一个案件已经裁决时,相同的问题不能在另一个法院重新审理,因为这样做会被认为是preclusive的。这一原则确保一旦某个问题得到解决,各方就不能继续争论相同的观点,从而促进法律程序的最终性和效率。既判力原则,即"已判事项",体现了法律背景下preclusive效力的理念。它旨在保护司法裁决的完整性,并防止在重复诉讼上浪费资源。如果个人被允许不断在法庭上提出相同的问题,这将导致混乱,并削弱司法系统的权威。此外,某些判决的preclusive性质不仅影响案件中的当事人,也可能影响第三方,特别是在某些裁决可能设定先例的情况下。例如,如果法院对某项法律的具体解释作出裁决,该裁决在未来类似案件中可能具有preclusive效力,指导其他法院的判决。这一法律方面说明了法官在裁决时需谨慎考虑其裁决的重要性,因为它们可能产生深远的影响。除了法律背景外,术语preclusive也可以应用于日常生活情境。例如,在个人关系中,某些行为或言语可能对未来的讨论或和解造成preclusive影响。如果一方伴侣不断贬低另一方,就会造成开放沟通变得不可能的环境。这种行为的preclusive效应可能导致信任和亲密关系的恶化,最终导致关系的破裂。理解preclusive行为的概念在法律和人际互动中都是至关重要的。它强调了我们言行的影响,因为这些行为可能带来持久的后果。就像在法律中,preclusive的裁决可能关闭未来诉讼的大门一样,在关系中,某些行为可能关闭对话和解决的途径。总之,术语preclusive在法律和个人背景中都包含着重要的原则。在法律中,它有助于维护判决的最终性并防止不必要的诉讼,而在个人关系中,它突显了我们行为对未来互动的影响。通过认识到我们决策的preclusive性质,我们可以努力营造鼓励开放沟通和相互尊重的环境,无论是在法庭上还是在日常生活中。