proscriptive

简明释义

英[prəʊˈskrɪptɪv]美[proʊˈskrɪptɪv]

adj. 放逐的；剥夺人权的；禁止的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Yes, I realize this description is not very proscriptive;

是的，我意识到这个描述的排斥性不是太强；

2.Yes, I realize this description is not very proscriptive;

是的，我意识到这个描述的排斥性不是太强；

3.The new regulations are too proscriptive 限制性的, making it difficult for small businesses to operate.

新的规定过于限制性，使得小企业难以运营。

4.Some argue that the proscriptive 限制性的 rules in the school dress code limit students' self-expression.

有人认为学校着装规范中的限制性规则限制了学生的自我表达。

5.The proscriptive 限制性的 nature of the contract left little room for negotiation.

合同的限制性性质几乎没有留下谈判的余地。

6.The proscriptive 限制性的 guidelines for research can stifle innovation.

研究的限制性指南可能会抑制创新。

7.In some cultures, proscriptive 限制性的 traditions dictate how individuals should behave.

在一些文化中，限制性的传统规定了个人应如何行为。

作文

In today's society, the concept of rules and regulations plays a crucial role in maintaining order and harmony. However, the nature of these rules can vary significantly, often falling into two categories: prescriptive and proscriptive. While prescriptive rules dictate what actions should be taken, proscriptive rules specify what actions are forbidden. Understanding the distinction between these two types of rules is essential for navigating social, legal, and personal landscapes effectively.To illustrate this point, consider the legal system. Laws are primarily proscriptive in nature; they outline behaviors that are not acceptable within a society. For example, laws against theft or assault clearly indicate that these actions are prohibited. The proscriptive nature of these laws serves to protect individuals and maintain social order. Without such prohibitions, chaos could ensue, as individuals would feel free to engage in harmful behaviors without fear of consequences.On the other hand, there are also prescriptive rules that encourage certain behaviors. For instance, laws requiring drivers to wear seatbelts are prescriptive because they promote safety and responsible behavior on the road. While both types of rules are necessary, the proscriptive rules often receive more attention due to their direct impact on individual freedoms and societal norms.In educational settings, the distinction between prescriptive and proscriptive rules also becomes evident. Schools often implement proscriptive policies to regulate student behavior, such as prohibiting bullying, cheating, or substance abuse. These rules aim to create a safe and conducive learning environment. Conversely, prescriptive policies may encourage students to participate in extracurricular activities or community service, guiding them toward positive engagement.Moreover, in personal relationships, understanding proscriptive boundaries can lead to healthier interactions. For example, setting proscriptive limits regarding communication styles or personal space can help prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. Establishing what is unacceptable in a relationship fosters mutual respect and understanding, contributing to a more harmonious connection.However, the proscriptive nature of rules can sometimes lead to resistance or rebellion, particularly among younger individuals. When faced with strict prohibitions, some may feel constrained and push back against authority. This highlights the importance of balancing proscriptive rules with opportunities for autonomy and self-expression. Finding a middle ground can encourage compliance while still allowing for personal growth and freedom.In conclusion, the concepts of prescriptive and proscriptive rules are integral to understanding societal dynamics. While proscriptive rules serve to protect and maintain order, it is essential to recognize their potential impact on individual freedoms. Striking a balance between encouraging positive behaviors through prescriptive measures and enforcing necessary prohibitions through proscriptive rules can lead to a more harmonious society. By fostering an environment where individuals understand the rationale behind these rules, we can promote cooperation, respect, and ultimately, a better quality of life for all.

在当今社会，规则和法规的概念在维护秩序和和谐方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而，这些规则的性质可能会有很大不同，通常分为两类：规定性规则和禁止性规则。规定性规则规定了应该采取的行动，而禁止性规则则明确了禁止的行动。理解这两种规则之间的区别对于有效地驾驭社会、法律和个人环境至关重要。为了说明这一点，考虑法律体系。法律主要是禁止性的；它们概述了社会中不可接受的行为。例如，针对盗窃或攻击的法律清楚地表明这些行为是被禁止的。这些法律的禁止性特征旨在保护个人并维护社会秩序。如果没有这样的禁止，混乱可能会随之而来，因为个人会觉得可以自由地参与有害行为而不必担心后果。另一方面，还有一些规定性规则鼓励某些行为。例如，要求驾驶员系安全带的法律是规定性的，因为它们促进了道路上的安全和负责任的行为。虽然这两种类型的规则都是必要的，但由于其对个人自由和社会规范的直接影响，禁止性规则往往受到更多关注。在教育环境中，规定性和禁止性规则之间的区别也变得明显。学校通常实施禁止性政策来规范学生行为，如禁止欺凌、作弊或药物滥用。这些规则旨在创造一个安全和有利于学习的环境。相反，规定性政策可能会鼓励学生参与课外活动或社区服务，引导他们积极参与。此外，在个人关系中，理解禁止性界限可以导致更健康的互动。例如，设定禁止性的沟通风格或个人空间限制可以帮助防止误解和冲突。建立在关系中不可接受的内容有助于促进相互尊重和理解，从而有助于建立更和谐的联系。然而，禁止性规则的性质有时会导致抵抗或叛逆，特别是在年轻人中。当面临严格的禁令时，一些人可能会感到受限，并对权威产生反抗。这突显了在<禁止性>规则与自主和自我表达的机会之间取得平衡的重要性。找到中间地带可以鼓励遵守，同时仍允许个人成长和自由。总之，规定性和禁止性规则的概念对于理解社会动态至关重要。虽然禁止性规则旨在保护和维护秩序，但认识到它们对个人自由的潜在影响也是至关重要的。在通过规定性措施鼓励积极行为与通过禁止性规则执行必要禁止之间找到平衡，可以导致一个更和谐的社会。通过营造一个个人理解这些规则背后理由的环境，我们可以促进合作、尊重，最终为所有人提供更好的生活质量。