undiplomatic

简明释义

英[ˌʌnˈdɪpləˌmætɪk]美[ˌʌnˈdɪpləˌmætɪk]

adj. 无外交策略的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.UNDIPLOMATIC: Your performance has been poor lately.

不得体表达：你最近的表现比较差。

2.UNDIPLOMATIC: Your performance has been poor lately.

不得体表达：你最近的表现比较差。

3.He could be the most undiplomatic man ever to hold such a post.

他可能是在这个位置上工作过的人中最不善交际的。

4.Using such undiplomatic language can damage relationships between countries.

使用如此不圆滑的语言可能会破坏国家之间的关系。

5.The ambassador's undiplomatic remarks about the host country caused a diplomatic scandal.

大使对东道国的不圆滑言论引发了一场外交丑闻。

6.Her undiplomatic approach to negotiations left many feeling uncomfortable.

她对谈判的不圆滑方式让许多人感到不适。

7.The CEO's undiplomatic response to criticism surprised everyone at the press conference.

首席执行官对批评的不圆滑回应让新闻发布会上的每个人都感到惊讶。

8.His comments during the meeting were quite undiplomatic, making it clear he was unhappy with the proposal.

他在会议上的评论相当不圆滑，明确表明他对这个提案不满意。

作文

In the world of international relations, the art of diplomacy is crucial for maintaining peace and fostering cooperation among nations. However, there are instances when individuals or representatives act in an undiplomatic manner, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. This essay will explore the implications of undiplomatic behavior and its impact on diplomatic relations.To begin with, being undiplomatic often means lacking the tact and sensitivity required in delicate situations. Diplomats are trained to navigate complex social and political landscapes, using language that is measured and considerate. When someone acts in a way that is undiplomatic, they may inadvertently offend others or escalate tensions. For example, a government official who publicly criticizes another country’s policies without any regard for the potential fallout is engaging in undiplomatic conduct. Such statements can damage relationships that took years to build and can provoke retaliatory actions.Moreover, undiplomatic behavior can undermine negotiations and compromise efforts. In diplomatic discussions, the goal is often to find common ground and reach agreements that benefit all parties involved. However, if one side adopts an undiplomatic stance, it can derail the process entirely. For instance, if a negotiator is overly aggressive or dismissive of the other party's concerns, it can create an atmosphere of distrust and hostility, making it nearly impossible to reach a satisfactory conclusion.Additionally, the consequences of being undiplomatic extend beyond immediate interactions. The reputation of a nation or organization can suffer if its representatives are seen as lacking decorum or respect. This can lead to isolation on the global stage, where allies may hesitate to collaborate with a country known for its undiplomatic behavior. In contrast, nations that prioritize diplomatic engagement and communication tend to foster stronger alliances and partnerships, which can be advantageous in times of crisis.Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that cultural differences play a significant role in what is considered undiplomatic. What may be perceived as straightforward or honest in one culture could be seen as rude or inappropriate in another. Therefore, diplomats must be culturally aware and sensitive to the norms and values of the countries they interact with. Failing to do so can result in undiplomatic remarks that alienate potential allies and create barriers to understanding.In conclusion, the concept of undiplomatic behavior is critical in the realm of international relations. It highlights the importance of tact, sensitivity, and cultural awareness in diplomatic interactions. By avoiding undiplomatic conduct, diplomats can foster better relationships, facilitate negotiations, and enhance their nation’s standing in the global community. Ultimately, the ability to communicate effectively and respectfully is what distinguishes successful diplomacy from undiplomatic blunders.

在国际关系的世界中，外交的艺术对于维护和平和促进国家间的合作至关重要。然而，有时个人或代表的行为会表现出不够外交的态度，这可能导致误解和冲突。本文将探讨不够外交的行为的影响及其对外交关系的影响。首先，不够外交的行为往往意味着缺乏在微妙情况下所需的机智和敏感性。外交官接受过培训，能够在复杂的社会和政治环境中游刃有余，使用经过衡量和考虑的语言。当某人以不够外交的方式行事时，他们可能无意中冒犯他人或加剧紧张局势。例如，一位政府官员公开批评另一个国家的政策，而没有考虑到潜在的后果，这就是一种不够外交的行为。这种言论可能会破坏花费多年建立的关系，并可能引发报复性行动。此外，不够外交的行为可能会破坏谈判和妥协的努力。在外交讨论中，目标通常是找到共同点，并达成对所有相关方都有利的协议。然而，如果一方采取不够外交的立场，整个过程可能会完全脱轨。例如，如果一位谈判者过于激进或轻视另一方的关切，这可能会造成不信任和敌意的氛围，使达成令人满意的结论几乎不可能。此外，不够外交的行为的后果超出了即时互动。如果一个国家的代表被视为缺乏礼仪或尊重，该国或组织的声誉可能会受到损害。这可能导致在全球舞台上的孤立，盟友可能会犹豫与一个因其不够外交的行为而闻名的国家合作。相反，优先考虑外交接触和沟通的国家往往能够培养更强的联盟和伙伴关系，这在危机时期可能是有利的。此外，必须认识到文化差异在何种程度上影响什么被认为是不够外交的。在一个文化中被视为直率或诚实的事情，在另一个文化中可能被视为粗鲁或不适当。因此，外交官必须具备文化意识，对他们所交往国家的规范和价值观保持敏感。如果未能做到这一点，可能会导致不够外交的言论，疏远潜在的盟友并创造理解的障碍。总之，不够外交的行为的概念在国际关系领域至关重要。它突显了在外交互动中机智、敏感性和文化意识的重要性。通过避免不够外交的行为，外交官可以促进更好的关系，推动谈判，并增强国家在全球社区中的地位。最终，有效和尊重的沟通能力是成功外交与不够外交的失误之间的区别所在。