refutable

简明释义

英[rɪˈfjuːtəbl]美[rɪˈfjuːtəbl]

adj. 可驳倒的；容易驳倒的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This article annotates the general contents about the audit of the project cost, also emphatically analyzes the refutable measures against the confirmation and counterclaim of a project.

文章诠释了工程结算审核的一般内容，分析了对签证和索赔的反驳。

2.Based on the dilemma in judicatory practice, the refutable criminal presumption can be applied to the demarcation of the constitutive conditions of dangerous driving criminal behavior.

鉴于司法实践中的困境，有必要对于危险驾驶机动车罪的构成要件认定采取适用可反驳的刑事推定原则。

3.According to different kinds of criteria, the presumption can be classified into legislative presumption and judicatory presumption, refutable presumption and irrefutable presumption, etc.

根据不同的标准，可以将推定分为立法推定与司法推定；可反驳的推定与不可反驳的推定等种类。

4.This argument also is refutable, even if the statement about the fast breathing be true, since a man may breathe hard without having a fever.

该论述同样是可以驳倒的，即使呼吸很快这一陈述为真，因为人没有发烧也会呼吸困难。

5.According to different kinds of criteria, the presumption can be classified into legislative presumption and judicatory presumption, refutable presumption and irrefutable presumption, etc.

根据不同的标准，可以将推定分为立法推定与司法推定；可反驳的推定与不可反驳的推定等种类。

6.In a debate, it's important to have refutable 可反驳的 arguments to strengthen your position.

在辩论中，拥有refutable 可反驳的论点对于加强你的立场是很重要的。

7.Many conspiracy theories are based on assumptions that are refutable 可反驳的 with factual information.

许多阴谋论基于一些用事实信息可以refutable 可反驳的假设。

8.The professor encouraged students to find refutable 可反驳的 points in their research papers.

教授鼓励学生在他们的研究论文中寻找refutable 可反驳的观点。

9.The lawyer's case was built on refutable 可反驳的 claims that could not hold up in court.

律师的案件建立在一些refutable 可反驳的主张上，这些主张在法庭上无法成立。

10.The scientist presented a theory that was easily refutable 可反驳的 by new evidence.

这位科学家提出的理论很容易被新证据所refutable 可反驳的。

作文

In the realm of critical thinking and debate, the ability to discern between arguments that are sound and those that are refutable is essential. A refutable argument is one that can be proven false or invalid through evidence or reasoning. This concept is vital in various fields, including science, philosophy, and law, where establishing the truth is paramount. For instance, in scientific research, hypotheses must be refutable. This means that they should be testable and capable of being disproven if new evidence emerges. A hypothesis that cannot be refutable is often viewed as unscientific because it does not allow for the possibility of falsification. Take the example of a scientist proposing that a certain drug cures a disease. If this claim is refutable, other researchers must be able to conduct experiments to test its validity. If repeated trials show no effect, the initial claim is disproven, demonstrating the importance of refutable claims in advancing knowledge.In philosophy, the importance of refutable arguments cannot be overstated. Philosophers often engage in debates where they present various viewpoints on complex issues. A strong philosophical argument is one that can withstand scrutiny and is not easily dismissed. When an argument is refutable, it invites counterarguments and fosters deeper discussion. For instance, consider the moral argument for the existence of God. Many philosophers have presented this argument, but it has also faced significant refutable critiques that challenge its validity. Engaging with these critiques allows for a richer exploration of the topic at hand.In the legal arena, the concept of refutable evidence plays a crucial role in ensuring justice. In a court of law, the prosecution must present evidence that is not easily refutable by the defense. This ensures that the verdict is based on solid ground rather than on conjecture. For example, DNA evidence is often considered strong because it is difficult to refutable when properly collected and analyzed. On the other hand, witness testimonies can sometimes be refutable due to inconsistencies or biases, which is why they are often scrutinized closely during trials.Moreover, the ability to identify refutable statements is a critical skill in everyday life. In an age of information overload, we are bombarded with claims from various sources, many of which lack substantial evidence. By honing our skills to recognize refutable arguments, we can better navigate discussions and make informed decisions. For example, when discussing climate change, some may assert that it is a hoax. This claim is easily refutable by the overwhelming scientific consensus and data supporting climate change. Understanding how to differentiate between valid arguments and those that are refutable empowers individuals to engage in meaningful conversations.In conclusion, the notion of refutable arguments is integral to various domains of knowledge and everyday discourse. Whether in science, philosophy, or law, recognizing and understanding refutable claims enables us to engage critically with information and ideas. As we develop our analytical skills, we become more adept at distinguishing between what is credible and what is not, ultimately leading to a more informed and rational society.

在批判性思维和辩论的领域，辨别合理的论点与那些可以被驳斥的论点的能力至关重要。一个可被驳斥的论点是指能够通过证据或推理被证明为错误或无效的论点。这个概念在科学、哲学和法律等多个领域中都是至关重要的，因为确立真相是首要任务。例如，在科学研究中，假设必须是可被驳斥的。这意味着它们应该是可测试的，并且如果出现新证据，能够被证明为错误。一个不能被驳斥的假设通常被视为不科学，因为它不允许被否定的可能性。以科学家提出某种药物治愈疾病为例。如果这一主张是可被驳斥的，其他研究人员必须能够进行实验来测试其有效性。如果重复试验显示没有效果，则初始主张被证明是错误的，这表明了可被驳斥的主张在推进知识方面的重要性。在哲学中，可被驳斥的论点的重要性更是不可低估。哲学家们经常参与辩论，提出关于复杂问题的各种观点。一个强有力的哲学论点是能够经受住审查的，不容易被驳斥。当一个论点是可被驳斥的，它会邀请反驳并促进更深入的讨论。例如，考虑上帝存在的道德论证。许多哲学家提出了这一论证，但它也面临着显著的可被驳斥的批评，挑战其有效性。与这些批评的互动使得对相关主题的探索更加丰富。在法律领域，可被驳斥的证据的概念在确保正义方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在法庭上，控方必须提出不容易被辩方驳斥的证据。这确保了裁决是基于坚实的基础，而不是基于推测。例如，DNA证据通常被认为是强有力的，因为在适当收集和分析时，难以被驳斥。另一方面，证人证言由于不一致或偏见，有时可能是可被驳斥的，这就是为什么它们在审判中经常受到严格审查。此外，识别可被驳斥的陈述的能力是日常生活中的一项关键技能。在信息过载的时代，我们被来自各个来源的主张轰炸，其中许多缺乏实质证据。通过磨练我们识别可被驳斥的论点的技能，我们可以更好地驾驭讨论并做出明智的决定。例如，在讨论气候变化时，有些人可能声称这是一个骗局。这个主张很容易被压倒性的科学共识和支持气候变化的数据所驳斥。理解如何区分可信的论点和那些可被驳斥的论点，使个人能够参与有意义的对话。总之，可被驳斥的论点的概念在各种知识领域和日常话语中都是不可或缺的。无论是在科学、哲学还是法律中，认识和理解可被驳斥的主张使我们能够批判性地与信息和思想互动。随着我们分析能力的发展，我们变得更加擅长于区分什么是可信的，什么不是，最终导致一个更加知情和理性的社会。