acquittal

简明释义

英[əˈkwɪt(ə)l]美[əˈkwɪtl]

n. 赦免；无罪开释；履行；尽职；（债务等的）清偿

复 数 a c q u i t t a l s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She was acquitted on the obstruction of justice charge and, according to press reports, the jury deadlocked 7-5 for acquittal on the contempt charges.

妨碍司法罪被判不成立，而在判定蔑视法庭罪不成立时，据媒体报道，陪审团却以7票对5票陷入僵局。

2.The defence lawyer made an eloquent plea for his client's acquittal.

被告方的律师为委托人的无罪开释作了有说服力的辩护。

3.An annulment or acquittal ; dismissal, as of a court order.

撤销令取消，宣告无罪；法院命令的撤销。

4.This usually happens after an acquittal or a "light" sentence in the first prosecution.

这通常发生后，被判无罪，或“光”一句中的首次起诉。

5.The jury voted 8-to-4 in favour of acquittal.

该陪审团以8票比4票投票赞成无罪判决。

6.A verdict of not guilt means acquittal for the accused, who can never again be charged with that specific crime.

无罪裁决意味着被告无罪，并且永远不得再以此罪名对其指控。

7.The judge announced the acquittal after finding insufficient evidence.

法官在发现证据不足后宣布了无罪释放。

8.His acquittal restored his reputation in the community.

他的无罪释放恢复了他在社区中的声誉。

9.An acquittal can sometimes be more impactful than a conviction in the eyes of the public.

在公众眼中，无罪释放有时比定罪更具影响力。

10.After a lengthy trial, the defendant received an acquittal on all charges.

经过漫长的审判，被告对所有指控获得了无罪释放。

11.The jury delivered a surprising acquittal, leaving everyone in the courtroom stunned.

陪审团做出了令人惊讶的无罪释放，让法庭上的每个人都感到震惊。

作文

In the realm of law, the term acquittal holds significant importance. It refers to a formal judgment that a person is not guilty of the crime with which they have been charged. This legal outcome can profoundly impact the lives of individuals and their families, as well as the broader community. Understanding the concept of acquittal is crucial for anyone interested in the judicial system and its implications on society.When a person is accused of a crime, they are subjected to a legal process that includes investigation, trial, and ultimately, a verdict. If the court finds that there is insufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the judge or jury may issue an acquittal. This does not necessarily mean that the defendant is innocent; rather, it signifies that the prosecution has failed to meet the burden of proof required for a conviction.The implications of an acquittal can be far-reaching. For the individual involved, it can mean the restoration of their freedom and reputation. Many people who are wrongfully accused suffer from the stigma associated with criminal charges, and an acquittal can help to alleviate some of that damage. However, the emotional and psychological toll of being accused can linger long after the verdict is delivered. The public perception of the individual may not change immediately, and they may continue to face prejudice and discrimination.Furthermore, an acquittal can also affect the community at large. It raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system and the reliability of the evidence presented during the trial. In some cases, high-profile acquittals can lead to public outcry and protests, especially if the case involved issues of race, class, or systemic injustice. These situations highlight the importance of transparency and accountability within the legal system to maintain public trust.Additionally, the concept of acquittal is not without controversy. Some argue that the standard of 'beyond a reasonable doubt' is too high, allowing potentially guilty individuals to escape punishment. This debate often centers around the balance between ensuring a fair trial for the accused and protecting society from harmful individuals. In contrast, others believe that the presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a fundamental principle of justice that must be upheld at all costs.In conclusion, the term acquittal encapsulates a critical aspect of the legal system that affects both individuals and society. It serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in the pursuit of justice. While an acquittal can bring relief to the accused, it also prompts reflection on the efficacy of the judicial process and the societal implications of legal outcomes. As we navigate these intricate issues, it is essential to engage in thoughtful discussions about the meaning of justice and the role of the law in our lives.

在法律领域，术语acquittal具有重要意义。它指的是对被指控罪行的人作出的正式判决，表明其无罪。这一法律结果可以深刻影响个人及其家庭的生活，以及更广泛的社区。理解acquittal的概念对于任何对司法系统及其对社会影响感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。当一个人被指控犯罪时，他们会经历一个包括调查、审判和最终裁决的法律程序。如果法庭发现没有足够的证据证明被告超出合理怀疑的罪行，法官或陪审团可能会作出acquittal的判决。这并不一定意味着被告是无辜的；而是表明控方未能满足定罪所需的举证责任。Acquittal的影响可以远及他人。对涉事个人而言，这可能意味着他们的自由和声誉得以恢复。许多被错误指控的人承受着与刑事指控相关的污名，而acquittal可以帮助减轻部分损害。然而，被指控所带来的情感和心理压力可能在裁决宣告后仍然存在。公众对个人的看法可能不会立即改变，他们可能继续面临偏见和歧视。此外，acquittal也可能影响整个社区。它引发了关于司法系统有效性和审判中呈现证据可靠性的问题。在某些情况下，高调的无罪释放可能导致公众愤慨和抗议，尤其是当案件涉及种族、阶级或系统性不公时。这些情况突显了法律体系内透明度和问责制的重要性，以维护公众信任。此外，acquittal的概念并非没有争议。一些人认为“超出合理怀疑”的标准过高，使得潜在的有罪个体逃脱惩罚。这个辩论通常围绕着确保被告获得公平审判与保护社会免受有害个体侵害之间的平衡。相反，其他人则认为，在被证明有罪之前，推定无罪是正义的基本原则，必须不惜一切代价维护。总之，术语acquittal概括了影响个人和社会的法律系统的一个关键方面。它提醒我们追求正义过程中固有的复杂性和挑战。虽然acquittal可以给被告带来解脱，但它也促使人们反思司法程序的有效性和法律结果的社会影响。在我们应对这些复杂问题时，进行有关正义意义及法律在我们生活中所扮演角色的深思熟虑的讨论至关重要。